Sr. Electrical Power Engineer

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate. We need to parse the posting. Content: Overview: description of company, mission, etc. Could be "About the role" or "Overview". The instruction says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can use About the role for overview. Then "Essential Duties And Responsibilities" -> Responsibilities. Then "Education and Licensure" -> maybe Qualifications? Actually Education and Licensure could be part of Requirements/Qualifications. Then "Skills, Experience And Qualifications" -> Skills, Experience And Qualifications. Then "Preferred Qualifications and Location Details" -> maybe Qualifications again? But we should avoid duplicate sections. We can combine. We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent. We need to use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. We need to include sections only when posting has real specific content. We need to avoid filler like "commensurate with experience" etc. Not present. We need to include Pay/Schedule/Benefits only if posting actually states them. The posting mentions: "As an L&A employee, you will be eligible for a competitive salary as well as a comprehensive benefits package including healthcare (medical and dental), 401K plan, and paid time off. We believe in investing in our employees beyond compensation and as an L&A employee, you will have access to in-house training, career pathing, mentoring, award programs, tuition reimbursement and much more." Thus we have Benefits section content: competitive salary, healthcare, 401k, PTO, in-house training, career pathing, mentoring, award programs, tuition reimbursement. Pay: they say competitive salary but not specific number. The instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state "competitive salary" and "comprehensive benefits package". So we can include Benefits section. Pay: they mention competitive salary but not a number; is that considered stating pay? It says "competitive salary". That is a statement about pay, albeit not specific. The instruction says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. "competitive salary" is not filler like those examples; it's a statement. So we could include Pay section with that statement. However they also say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Might combine Pay and Benefits into one Benefits section? But they have separate headings list. Could include Benefits only, and mention salary within Benefits. But they said "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state competitive salary, so we could include Pay. But we might avoid thin Pay section if we can incorporate into Benefits. However they want to use headings for Benefits, Pay, Schedule. If we include Pay we need to give content. Could say "

  Competitive salary.

  " That's thin but still substantive? It's not filler like "commensurate with experience". It's a statement. Might be okay. Schedule: posting mentions "Onsite position in Oak Ridge, TN". That's location, not schedule. No schedule info like full-time, shift, etc. So we should not create Schedule section. Now we need to decide sections: About the role (overview), Responsibilities, Requirements (maybe Education and Licensure + Required Skills), Qualifications (maybe Preferred Qualifications), Skills (maybe combine with Requirements?), Benefits (including salary). We need to avoid duplication. Let's extract content: Overview paragraph: "Longenecker & Associates (L&A), a Geosyntec Company, is a trusted partner enabling critical missions across the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex for more than 35 years. We contribute to DOE’s nuclear security and environmental remediation enterprise by providing the highest-caliber staff and experts. We are seeking a motivated Sr. Electrical Power Engineer to contribute to our mission supporting our work at Centrus Energy in Oak Ridge, TN. Geosyntec is an innovative, international engineering and consulting firm serving private and public-sector clients to address new ventures and complex problems involving our environment, natural resources, and civil infrastructure. Our engineers, scientists, technical and project employees serve our clients from offices across the world. Ranked by ENR as one of the top environmental engineering design firms, Geosyntec is internationally known for its technical leadership, broad experience, and exceptional client service. We invest in our people. Each employee is unique, and your career at Geosyntec will be too. We offer competitive pay and benefits, and well-being programs to support you and your family. To Learn More Visit: http://www.geosyntec.com/careers/ ." We should remove the "To Learn More Visit:" line as it's application instructions? It's a link to careers page; maybe considered boilerplate? It's not exactly application instructions but could be considered navigation. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. This is a link to learn more; could be considered navigation. Safer to remove it. Thus About the role section will contain the overview paragraphs without that line. Responsibilities: "Essential Duties And Responsibilities Centrus Energy is looking for an innovator who thrives on solving complex electrical challenges and turning big ideas into real-world solutions. As a Sr. Electrical Power Engineer, you’ll dive into advanced instrumentation, motor controls, and power electronics to help us design, deploy, and optimize critical systems for our manufacturing and enrichment facilities. If you love tinkering with everything from simulation tools to modern power electronics devices — and want your designs to make a big impact — this role puts you at the center of it all. What You Will Do You’ll lead the design, development, and deployment of cutting-edge electronics, from concept to completion. One day you’ll be building design packages and running simulations in PSPICE or MATLAB, the next you’ll be mentoring engineers or walking down systems to troubleshoot issues. You’ll manage multiple projects, collaborate across disciplines, and balance cost, schedule, and technical performance — all while helping shape the future of our centrifuge technology and supporting the Department of Energy’s mission. In short, you’ll be the go-to expert who makes sure our machines (and teams) run smoothly and reliably." We need to turn duties into
  • . The prose can be

    for overview sentences, then list. We can split: first paragraph as prose, then "What You Will Do" as list. List items: - Lead the design, development, and deployment of cutting-edge electronics, from concept to completion. - Building design packages and running simulations in PSPICE or MATLAB. - Mentoring engineers or walking down systems to troubleshoot issues. - Manage multiple projects, collaborate across disciplines, and balance cost, schedule, and technical performance. - Help shape the future of our centrifuge technology and support the Department of Energy’s mission. - Be the go-to expert who makes sure our machines (and teams) run smoothly and reliably. But we need to preserve all substantive info; we can keep the original sentences. Now Education and Licensure: "Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering." That's a requirement. Skills, Experience And Qualifications: list: - 6+ years of experience in industrial electronics (preferably with emphasis on PEEM design) - 1+ years’ experience in manufacturing, embedded systems design, and/or R&D - Strong skills across electrical systems, from low-voltage DC to three-phase AC - Proficiency in simulation and analysis tools (e.g., PSPICE, MATLAB, Simulink, OrCAD) - Excellent written, verbal, and presentation skills - Due to federal contract security requirements, candidates must be able to successfully pass a federal background investigation to secure and maintain DOE Q security clearance if required. - Due to federal contract security requirements, this position requires U.S. Citizenship. - Successful candidates will be able to perform the essential functions of the job with reasonable accommodation. - This job posting reflects management’s assignment of essential functions and the descriptions listed do not restrict management’s right to assign or reassign duties and responsibilities to this job at any time. - Health & Safety training, medical monitoring, and client-driven drug and background testing. - Please note that marijuana remains a Schedule III controlled substance under Federal Law. - Federal contractors must follow Federal drug-free workplace rules, which prohibit marijuana use, even if medical or recreational use is permitted under State Law. We need to remove boilerplate like EEO etc. The last few lines about marijuana and drug-free workplace might be considered legal boilerplate. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. Those lines about marijuana and drug-free workplace are legal. So we should remove them. Also the line about Health & Safety training, medical monitoring, and client-driven drug and background testing might be considered boilerplate? It's about requirements; could be considered substantive? It's about health & safety training etc. Might be considered part of qualifications? It's a requirement. Might keep? It's not exactly EEO. It's about health & safety training etc. Could be considered part of job requirements. However it's somewhat generic. The instruction says remove legal boilerplate. Health & Safety training etc might be considered boilerplate but it's specific to the job? It's typical for many federal contracts. I'd lean to remove it as boilerplate. However we need to preserve ALL substantive information; if we remove it, we might be losing a requirement. But it's likely boilerplate. I'd remove it. Also the line "This job posting reflects management’s assignment of essential functions..." is also boilerplate (management rights). Remove. Thus we keep the substantive qualifications: Bachelor's degree, 6+ years experience, 1+ years experience, strong skills, proficiency, excellent communication, federal background investigation, US citizenship, reasonable accommodation. Now Preferred Qualifications and Location Details: - Active Q-level security clearance - 4+ years’ experience in the nuclear industry - Knowledge of industrial plant electrical systems, national electrical codes, and standards (UL, IEEE, NEC, ANSI, OSHA, NUREGS) - Experience with electric motor design/manufacturing - Background in embedded software development and testing - Onsite position in Oak Ridge, TN Also benefits: "As an L&A employee, you will be eligible for a competitive salary as well as a comprehensive benefits package including healthcare (medical and dental), 401K plan, and paid time off. We believe in investing in our employees beyond compensation and as an L&A employee, you will have access to in-house training, career pathing, mentoring, award programs, tuition reimbursement and much more." Thus Benefits section: competitive salary, healthcare (medical and dental), 401k, paid time off, in-house training, career pathing, mentoring, award programs, tuition reimbursement. Pay section: maybe we can just mention competitive salary within Benefits; but we could also have Pay section with "Competitive salary." However that would be thin. I'd rather incorporate salary into Benefits and not create a separate Pay section, to avoid thin section. The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we can omit Pay section and just include salary in Benefits. Schedule: none. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (maybe combine Education and Licensure + Skills, Experience And Qualifications?), Qualifications (Preferred). But we need to decide headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits. The instruction list includes Skills as a possible heading. We could have Requirements for education/licensure, Skills for the skills list, Qualifications for preferred qualifications. Or we could combine.