Social Worker or School Psychologist (270)

We need to produce HTML fragment with sections for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes two job postings: Social Worker and School Psychologist. It includes qualifications, requirements, etc. No explicit Benefits, Pay, Schedule sections (except salary schedule link). There's a link to salary schedule information, but not explicit pay amount. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It says "Salary schedule information can be found by clicking the link below". That's a reference to pay info, but not stating actual pay. Might be considered stating that salary schedule info is available via link. Is that enough to include a Pay section? The rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It states that salary schedule information can be found by clicking the link below. That is stating that pay info exists via link. I'd argue we can include a Pay section with that link. However, we must not invent or summarize away detail. We can include a

with the link. Similarly, Schedule: no mention. Benefits: none. So we may include About the role (maybe a brief description?), Responsibilities (none explicit), Requirements (list), Qualifications (list), Skills (list). The posting includes qualifications like license, degree, etc. Also skills: outstanding verbal, written communication and organizational skills, bilingual preferred. For School Psychologist: multiple levels with qualifications. We need to preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include both job postings? The instruction: "You reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML." The user gave a combined posting with two roles. Likely we need to output both job postings each with sections. But we must not repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it). So we should not put

Social Worker

etc. Instead we start with sections like About the role, Responsibilities, etc. But we have two distinct roles; maybe we need to output two separate blocks each preceded by the job title implicitly? Since we cannot use job title as heading, we could just start with the sections for each role, but that would be ambiguous. Perhaps we should output each role as a with a heading for the role? But instruction says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It didn't forbid other headings like for job title? It says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". So we should not include job title heading at all. So we just output the sections for each role sequentially, but without a title, it's confusing. However maybe the expectation is to output a single job posting (the user gave combined but maybe they want us to pick one? The posting includes both Social Worker and School Psychologist; maybe they are two separate postings but we need to reformat each. Could output two blocks each with sections. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, fingerprint background check, equal opportunity, no smoking policy. Remove those. We must preserve all substantive information: license requirements, degree, eligibility, skills, bilingual preference, school psychologist levels, transcripts, letter of interest, resume, licensure, salary schedule link, address, phone. We need to format lists with

• . Use

  for prose. We must not include sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We need to decide which sections to include: About the role (maybe a brief description? Not given). Could we omit About the role if no specific content? The rule: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So if there is no prose describing the role, we should not include About the role. Similarly Responsibilities: none given. So we skip those. We have Requirements: could be the license, degree, eligibility, etc. Qualifications: maybe similar. Skills: communication, organizational, bilingual. Benefits: none. Pay: we have salary schedule link. Schedule: none. Thus we will output sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Pay. Possibly also "Application Materials" but not in allowed headings. Not needed. We need to include both job postings. How to differentiate? Could wrap each in with a for the job title? But instruction says do NOT repeat the job title as a heading. However maybe they mean do not repeat the job title as a section heading like

  Social Worker

  . Using might be okay? The instruction only mentions

  for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't forbid other headings. But to be safe, we could not include any heading for job title and just rely on ordering: first block for Social Worker, second for School Psychologist. But that may be confusing. Alternatively, we could output two elements each with a containing the job title as plain text (not a heading). But that might be considered repeating job title as heading? Not exactly. Given the ambiguity, I'll output two elements each with a containing the job title (since it's not one of the listed section headings). The instruction only forbids using job title as a heading (maybe they mean as a section heading like About the role etc). But using might be okay. However to be safe, I could avoid any heading for job title and just start with

  Requirements

  for each, but then we need to differentiate. Could add a preceding

  with the job title in plain text. That would not be a heading. Eg:

  Social Worker

  Requirements

  ... That repeats the job title but not as a heading. The instruction: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". It doesn't forbid repeating as plain text. So we can do that. Thus for each role: plain text job title line, then sections. Let's extract content. Social Worker: - Valid Social Work License (LMSW or LISW) from the New Mexico Social Work Examiners Board - Master's Degree in Social Work or related field from an accredited college or university - Eligible for licensure by the New Mexico Public Education Department (PED) - Outstanding verbal, written communication and organizational skills - Bilingual and Bi-literate in English and Spanish preferred No explicit responsibilities. School Psychologist: We have three levels with qualifications. Level 1: - Master's Degree or Ed. S. Degree in school psychology or equivalent or Doctoral degree in school, clinical or counseling psychology. - Passing score on the required licensure examination in school psychology. Level 2: - Ed. S. Degree in school psychology or equivalent or Doctoral degree in school, clinical or counseling psychology. - Passing score on the required licensure examination in school psychology. - Three years of experience as a school psychologist in the State of NM. Level 3: - Doctoral degree in school, clinical or counseling psychology. - Passing score on the required licensure examination in school psychology. - Licensed as a psychologist by the NM Board. - Three years of experience as a school psychologist in the State of NM. Also: To be considered an eligible applicant your AppliTrack application must contain the following uploaded documents: - A Letter of Interest - A Current Resume - Transcripts - Licensure Salary schedule information link. Address and phone. We need to include Requirements, Qualifications, Skills sections. For School Psychologist, the qualifications are the levels. Skills maybe not listed; but we could treat the license/degree as qualifications, and maybe skills not given. Could omit Skills if none. But we have outstanding verbal etc only for Social Worker. For School Psychologist, no explicit skills. Thus for Social Worker: Requirements (license, degree, eligibility), Qualifications (maybe same?), Skills (communication, organizational, bilingual). Could split: Requirements: license, degree, eligibility. Qualifications: maybe same? But to avoid duplication, we could treat Requirements as license/degree/eligibility, Qualifications as maybe none, Skills as communication etc. However we need to preserve all info; we can put license/degree/eligibility under Requirements, and communication/bilingual under Skills. For School Psychologist: Requirements could be the license/degree/exam etc (common across levels). Qualifications could be the levels with experience. Skills: none. Let's craft. We'll output:

  Social Worker

  Requirements

  • Valid Social Work License (LMSW or LISW) from the New Mexico Social Work Examiners Board
  • Master's Degree in Social Work or related field from an accredited college or university
  • Eligible for licensure by the New Mexico Public Education Department (PED)

  Skills

  • Outstanding verbal, written communication and organizational skills
  • Bilingual and bi-literate in English and Spanish (preferred)
  Then School Psychologist:

  School Psychologist

  Requirements

  • Master's Degree or Ed. S. Degree in school psychology or equivalent or Doctoral degree in school, clinical or counseling psychology
  • Passing score on the required licensure examination in school psychology

  Qualifications

  • Level 1: Master's or Ed. S. or Doctoral degree (as above) and passing licensure exam
  • Level 2: Ed. S. or Doctoral degree, passing licensure exam, and three years of experience as a school psychologist in NM
  • Level 3: Doctoral degree, passing licensure exam, licensed as psychologist by NM Board, and three years of experience as a school psychologist in NM

  Application Materials

  (but not allowed heading). We cannot add Application Materials as it's not in list. Could we include under Requirements? The documents are not requirements but application materials. The instruction only allows certain headings; we should not create new headings. So we need to fit that info somewhere allowed. Could we put under Requirements? It's not a requirement but a material. Could we put under Qualifications? Not really. Could we put under Skills? No. Could we omit? But we must preserve ALL substantive information. So we need to include the list of required documents somewhere. Since we cannot create a new heading, we could embed them in a

  paragraph under maybe Requirements or Qualifications as a note. But that might be considered altering meaning? It's still preserving info. We could add a

  after the sections: "To be considered an eligible applicant your AppliTrack application must contain the following uploaded documents: A Letter of Interest, A Current Resume, Transcripts, Licensure." That's prose, okay. Similarly, salary schedule link: we can put under Pay section. Thus we need a Pay section: include the link. We also have address and phone: could be placed in a

  under maybe About the role? Not allowed. Could we put under Requirements? Not appropriate. Could we put under a generic

  without heading? The instruction says output ONLY the HTML fragment, we can include

  elements anywhere. So we can include a

  with address and phone after the sections, not under a heading. That's fine. We must not include boilerplate like background check, EEO, no smoking. Remove those. Thus final HTML:

  Social Worker

  Requirements

  ...

  Skills

  ...

  School Psychologist

  Requirements

  ...

  Qualifications

  ...