Jobs · Business Development · Texas

Senior Manager, Strategy & Engagement- Risk & Resilience (RapidScale) (Remote)

Spectrum Business · Houston, TX · 1 mo ago
On-siteBusiness DevelopmentFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections for headings where there is real content. Must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must remove boilerplate like EEO, legal, cookie, navigation, application instructions, duplicated lines. Must preserve substantive info. We need to parse the posting. The posting includes: - Intro: "This role requires the ability to work lawfully in the U.S. without employment-based immigration sponsorship, now or in the future." That's a requirement (maybe under Requirements). Also "At RapidScale, exceptional technology is powered by exceptional people..." That's about the company (About the role? maybe About the company). Then description of RapidScale, building Risk & Resilience advisory practice, seeking Senior Manager, Strategy & Engagement – Risk & Resilience to provide senior advisory, commercial, and delivery leadership across the practice. This role will help shape major enterprise pursuits, oversee a portfolio of client engagements, establish strong commercial and delivery governance, and ensure RapidScale brings an integrated Risk & Resilience perspective to complex client challenges. The Senior Manager will operate across the full lifecycle of the practice—from opportunity development and pursuit strategy through solution shaping, pricing and scope governance, delivery oversight, and executive client engagement. This is not a traditional program management role or a purely technical cybersecurity position. The ideal candidate is a senior consulting-trained Risk & Resilience practitioner who can move comfortably between executive advisory conversations, complex pursuit leadership, commercial decision-making, and delivery oversight. The role requires the ability to connect enterprise risk, resilience, cybersecurity, AI, cloud, governance, and compliance into a cohesive business-facing advisory strategy while bringing the consulting discipline and commercial judgment necessary to help scale a growing practice. Then "What You’ll Do" with subsections: Portfolio & Advisory Leadership, Major Pursuit & Solution Leadership, Commercial Governance, Delivery Oversight, Practice Development & Growth. Each has bullet points (actually sentences separated by periods). We need to turn each bullet into
  • inside
      . The headings for these subsections should be

      (section headings). The overall sections: About the role? Responsibilities? Requirements? Qualifications? Skills? Benefits? Pay? Schedule? According to instruction: use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we need to decide which sections we have content for. We have content about the role (description) maybe "About the role" or "Responsibilities". The "What You’ll Do" is responsibilities. So we could have a section

      Responsibilities

      with subheadings? Actually they said use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So top-level sections are those headings. Within those we can have
      • for lists. They didn't forbid subheadings inside, but likely we should just use

        for each main section and then
        • for content. If we have multiple subcategories like Portfolio & Advisory Leadership etc., we could either treat each as a

          subsection under Responsibilities, but that would be multiple

          headings. The instruction says use

          for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid using

          for sub-sections, but they gave examples of typical sections. Probably they expect each major section to be an

          . So we could have:

          About the role

          ... description ...

          Responsibilities

          • ...
          • ...

          Requirements

          • ...
          • ...

          Qualifications

          maybe combine Required and Preferred? They said use headings for Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we could have Required Qualifications under

          Qualifications

          and Preferred Qualifications maybe also under same or separate? Could put both under Qualifications with sub-bullets? But they said prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Required and Preferred into Qualifications section, with two sub-lists? But we need to use
          • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we could have two
              under Qualifications: one for Required, one for Preferred, each preceded by maybe a

              label? But they didn't say we can't have

              inside. We could do:

              Qualifications

              Required:

                ...

              Preferred:

                ...
              That seems okay. We also have "What You’ll Do" which is responsibilities. So we will put that under Responsibilities. We also have introductory statements about ability to work lawfully in US without sponsorship - that is a requirement (maybe under Requirements). Also maybe under Qualifications? It's a requirement for eligibility. We'll put under Requirements. We also have statements about the company: "At RapidScale, exceptional technology is powered by exceptional people..." That's about the company, could go under About the role or maybe a brief About the company. Since they said About the role is a possible heading, we can put that there. We also have "Here, our employees don’t just have jobs, they're building careers. That’s why we offer a comprehensive pay and benefits package that rewards employees for their contributions to our success, supporting all aspects of their well-being at every stage of life." That's about benefits/pay. So we can create a Benefits section (maybe also Pay). Since they said include Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections only if posting actually states them. It mentions comprehensive pay and benefits package, but no specific details. It says "comprehensive pay and benefits package". That is somewhat vague but still states that there is a pay and benefits package. However instruction: "never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. 'commensurate with experience', 'not specified', 'N/A', 'varies', 'TBD')". The phrase "comprehensive pay and benefits package" is not specific but it's not placeholder like "commensurate with experience". It's a statement that they offer a package. Could we include a Benefits section with a

              summarizing that they offer comprehensive pay and benefits? That seems substantive enough (they mention it). However they also say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Might be okay to include Benefits. We also have no mention of Schedule, so omit Schedule. We also have no explicit Pay details, just "comprehensive pay". Could we include Pay section? Might be thin. Better to combine Pay and Benefits into one Benefits section? But they said use headings e.g. Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Could we have a Benefits section that mentions both pay and benefits? Probably okay. We also have EEO statement etc which we must remove. Also there is a paragraph about Charter Communications etc which seems unrelated to the job (maybe from a different job posting). That is boilerplate/navigation? It's about Charter Communications, not RapidScale. Likely it's a mistake or included erroneously. We should remove it as it's not substantive to the role. Also "Get to Know Us Charter Communications..." etc. Remove. Also "Here, our employees don’t just have jobs, they're building careers..." is part of RapidScale? Actually after the job description they talk about "Here, our employees don’t just have jobs..." That seems like a generic benefits statement from RapidScale. We'll keep that. Also "A qualified applicant’s criminal history, if any, will be considered in a manner consistent with applicable laws, including local ordinances." That's legal/EEO boilerplate; remove. Also "Learn about Life at Spectrum." etc. Remove. Thus we need to extract substantive content: - About the role/company: At RapidScale, exceptional technology is powered by exceptional people. We deliver secure, reliable managed and advisory services across private, public, and hybrid clouds, helping organizations innovate, adapt, and grow. As an Elite Broadcom VMware VCSP Partner and top partner with AWS, Azure, and Google, our solutions focus on business outcomes with embedded cyber resiliency and AI to protect today and enable tomorrow backed by the strength of the Cox family of companies. RapidScale is building a Risk & Resilience advisory practice designed to help enterprise clients navigate increasingly complex challenges across business resilience, governance, cybersecurity, cloud transformation, artificial intelligence, compliance, exposure management, and operational readiness. We are seeking a Senior Manager, Strategy & Engagement – Risk & Resilience to provide senior advisory, commercial, and delivery leadership across the practice. This role will help shape major enterprise pursuits, oversee a portfolio of client engagements, establish strong commercial and delivery governance, and ensure RapidScale brings an integrated Risk & Resilience perspective to complex client challenges. The Senior Manager will operate across the full lifecycle of the practice—from opportunity development and pursuit strategy through solution shaping, pricing and scope governance, delivery oversight, and executive client engagement. This is not a traditional program management role or a purely technical cybersecurity position. The ideal candidate is a senior consulting-trained Risk & Resilience practitioner who can move comfortably between executive advisory conversations, complex pursuit leadership, commercial decision-making, and delivery oversight. The role requires the ability to connect enterprise risk, resilience, cybersecurity, AI, cloud, governance, and compliance into a cohesive business-facing advisory strategy while bringing the consulting discipline and commercial judgment necessary to help scale a growing practice. That's a lot; we can put as

              under About the role. - Responsibilities: The bullet points under "What You’ll Do" with subheadings. We need to convert each bullet into

            • . The bullet points are sentences separated by periods. We'll treat each sentence as a list item. Let's list them: Portfolio & Advisory Leadership - Provide senior leadership across a portfolio of Risk & Resilience pursuits and client engagements. - Establish priorities across active opportunities and delivery workstreams based on client needs, strategic value, resource requirements, risk, and commercial considerations. - Serve as a senior advisor to enterprise clients navigating complex issues involving risk, resilience, cybersecurity, AI, cloud, governance, compliance, and operational readiness. - Lead executive-level conversations with CIOs, CISOs, CTOs, risk, compliance, security, and transformation leaders. - Help clients translate complex business and technology risks into actionable strategies, investment priorities, roadmaps, and transformation plans. - Provide senior review and guidance on client recommendations, executive deliverables, and strategic readouts. Major Pursuit & Solution Leadership - Lead the shaping of complex, strategic, and high-value Risk & Resilience pursuits. - Partner with sales, practice leadership, and technical subject matter experts to define the client problem, advisory approach, scope, solution, and value proposition. - Lead or provide senior oversight for discovery sessions, executive workshops, proposal development, and pursuit presentations. - Determine the appropriate combination of advisory, cybersecurity, cloud, AI, compliance, and delivery capabilities required to address client needs. - Ensure pursuits are structured around measurable client outcomes rather than isolated technical activities. - Provide senior-level support for strategic client presentations and executive decision-making throughout the pursuit lifecycle. Commercial Governance - Provide oversight for SOW development, pricing, scope, assumptions, resource models, and engagement economics across Risk & Resilience opportunities. - Evaluate proposed engagements for delivery feasibility, commercial risk, and alignment with practice capabilities. - Partner with practice and business leadership to validate pricing strategies and delivery models for complex engagements. - Identify potential scope, margin, delivery, or resource risks before commitments are made to clients. - Help establish repeatable commercial guardrails and pricing approaches as the practice scales. - Ensure that what is sold can be successfully delivered and that client expectations are appropriately established throughout the pursuit process. Delivery Oversight - Provide senior oversight across multiple concurrent Risk & Resilience engagements. - Establish delivery expectations and governance for complex or high-visibility client work. - Monitor engagement health, client satisfaction, scope,

  • Similar jobs