Senior Distribution Designer 1 -- Grid

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. So we need to decide which sections to include. We have content for About the role (hybrid schedule, remote, relocation). Responsibilities (list). Qualifications (maybe the "We do not sponsor..." is a qualification). Skills (Essential Skills And Experience + Valued But Not Required). Benefits (the long list). Pay (Compensation Range). Schedule (maybe we could extract schedule details: hybrid, remote until office opens). But we already used About the role for schedule; but we could still have Schedule section with that info and keep About the role more generic? However About the role currently includes schedule and relocation. Could split: About the role: brief description of role (project team environment, etc). Schedule: hybrid/remote details. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's think: The posting first sentence: "This position allows for a hybrid work schedule with a mix of work spent in office and working remote from home once our Lexington, KY office opens. Until then, this would be a remote, work from home position." That's schedule. Then "Under The Direction Of a Project Lead, This Position Will Offer You The Opportunity To Work In a Project Team Environment With Other Engineers And Designers Using Your Knowledge Of Design Practices To Prepare construction sketches and details for: ..." That's role description. Thus we can have About the role: description of role (project team, tasks). Schedule: hybrid/remote details. Relocation package maybe under Benefits? Or About the role? It says "Dependent upon your location, this opportunity offers a generous relocation package." That could be under Benefits or maybe a separate section but we don't have a heading for relocation. Could include in Benefits as part of relocation package. But Benefits already includes many items; we could add relocation as a bullet. But we must not invent content; we can include relocation as part of Benefits if we want, but it's not listed under Benefits section originally. However we could still include it under Benefits as it's a benefit. The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we can include relocation package under Benefits as it's a benefit. But we need to ensure we don't add headings that aren't present. Adding a Benefits section is okay because the posting has benefits info. Adding a bullet about relocation is okay as it's from the posting. Now, we need to decide sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Possibly also Requirements? The posting doesn't have a separate Requirements section distinct from Qualifications/Skills. Could combine Qualifications and Skills. But we have both headings available. We could put Qualifications for the "We do not sponsor..." and maybe education/experience? Actually education/experience is under Essential Skills And Experience. That's more skills/qualifications. Could treat Qualifications as the education/experience requirements, and Skills as the technical skills. But the posting splits: Essential Skills And Experience (includes education, experience, software, etc). Valued But Not Required Skills And Experience (additional). So we could map: - Qualifications: Education and experience requirements (Associate’s Degree..., 7+ years drafting, 10 years distribution design, etc). Actually those are under Essential Skills And Experience. But we can treat them as Qualifications. - Skills: Technical skills: Proficient with AutoCAD/MicroStation, ability to visualize, knowledge of design techniques, etc. Also Valued But Not Required. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's extract: Essential Skills And Experience bullet points (as sentences): - Associate’s Degree in Drafting, and/or a Bachelor's Degree in Engineering Technology, and/or a high school diploma. - 7 or more years drafting course work or equivalent technical experience. - A minimum of 10 years of distribution design experience. - Proficient with AutoCAD and/or MicroStation. - Ability to visualize systems without the aid of the computer. - An Associate’s Degree in Computer Aided Design. - Knowledge of design techniques, tools, and principles involved in production of technical plans, blueprints, drawings, and models. - Knowledge of the practical application of engineering science and technology, including the ability to relate various equipment to a technical design. - Knowledgeable in applicable codes, standards, and distribution software programs. - Familiarity with design codes and standards such as NESC, NEC, ANSI, IEEE, GIS/GWD. - Experience with complex overhead and underground distribution projects (120/208V through 34 kV). - Strong communication skills. Valued But Not Required Skills And Experience: - Familiarity with various distribution design/analysis software. - Familiarity with GIS software. - Experience in utility distribution inspections and/or construction. Technology & Innovation section: generic about using tech, AI, etc. Not specific requirement; could be omitted as it's boilerplate? It's not exactly boilerplate but it's a generic statement about valuing tech. Might be considered not specific enough for a Skills section? But we could include under Skills as "Experience with AI, automation, programming, or similar technologies is valued where relevant but is not required unless specifically identified elsewhere." However that's somewhat generic. Might be okay to include but risk of being filler. The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). This is not exactly filler but it's a generic statement. Might be okay to include but we could omit to keep sections thin. Now Qualifications: The line "We do not sponsor employees for work authorization in the U.S. for this position." That's a qualification/requirement. Also maybe we could include the education/experience there but we already used them under Skills. To avoid duplication, we could put education/experience under Qualifications, and skills under Skills. Let's decide: Qualifications: - Associate’s Degree in Drafting, and/or a Bachelor's Degree in Engineering Technology, and/or a high school diploma. - 7 or more years drafting course work or equivalent technical experience. - A minimum of 10 years of distribution design experience. - We do not sponsor employees for work authorization in the U.S. for this position. Skills: - Proficient with AutoCAD and/or MicroStation. - Ability to visualize systems without the aid of the computer. - An Associate’s Degree in Computer Aided Design. (maybe this is also qualification but okay) - Knowledge of design techniques