Senior Director, Design Strategy, Global Jordan
for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose. Do NOT repeat job title as heading. Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, equal-opportunity, scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it — never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text. Prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones.
We need to parse the posting content.
The posting includes:
- "Who You’ll Work With": description of who you'll work with. This could be considered "About the role" or maybe "Responsibilities"? Actually it's about who you'll work with, not responsibilities. Could be part of "About the role" or "Team". But we only have allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We can map content accordingly.
- "Who We Are Looking For": description of desired candidate. This could be "Requirements" or "Qualifications". We need to decide.
- Then there is a line: "Bachelor’s degree in business administration, Economics, Applied Science, or a related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training." That's qualification.
- Then "10+ years prior design leadership experience in strategy, innovation-led or future-focused creative studios." That's requirement.
- Then a bunch of bullet-like statements: "Proven ability to influence senior leaders and align diverse stakeholder groups to clear decisions." etc. Those are requirements/qualifications.
- Then there is a compliance section: "Compliance Recruiters refer to the Job Levelling Grid on the TA Playbook for education + years of experience US approved Immigration job posting compliance verbiage (choose one): Bachelor’s degree in design management or related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training Master’s degree in design or related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training For US roles, job descriptions should not include any verbiage that reference a requirement to pass a background check for the role. To promote this role to retail talent, please include the tagline- “Mynext: Be Empowered to Grow within Nike and Create the Future”"
This is boilerplate/compliance, should be removed.
- Then "What You’ll Work On": description of responsibilities.
- Then "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate ...": list of responsibilities.
- Then "We offer a number of accommodations to complete our interview process including screen readers, sign language interpreters, accessible and single location for in-person interviews, closed captioning, and other reasonable modifications as needed. If you discover, as you navigate our application process, that you need assistance or an accommodation due to a disability, please complete the Candidate Accommodation Request Form."
That's about accommodations, maybe part of Benefits? But it's about interview accommodations, not benefits. Could be considered part of "Benefits"? Not exactly. Might be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO but it's about accommodations. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is about accommodations for disability, which might be considered EEO/legal. Probably should remove.
Thus we need to extract substantive content: Who you'll work with, Who we are looking for (requirements/qualifications), What you'll work on (responsibilities), plus the list of responsibilities under "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate". Also maybe the bullet list of responsibilities.
We need to decide sections.
Potential sections:
- About the role: could combine "Who You’ll Work With" and maybe a brief overview? But we have "What You’ll Work On" which is responsibilities. So we could have:
About the role
with paragraph describing who you'll work with and the purpose.
Responsibilities
with - list of responsibilities from "What You’ll Work On" and the bullet list.
Requirements
with - list of requirements: education, years experience, proven ability to influence, expertise, etc.
We could also have Qualifications separate but maybe combine with Requirements. The instruction says prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could have About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements. That's three sections.
We must not include Benefits, Pay, Schedule unless present. Not present.
We must not repeat job title as heading.
We must not include filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present.
We need to preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from the sections we keep.
Let's extract details.
From "Who You’ll Work With":
"You will lead the Design Strategy function and work in close partnership with the Chief Design Officer, Product Creation business leaders and their strategy teams, VP/Creative Directors across Design, Brand Marketing creative leaders, NXT and Innovation leaders, and cross‑functional partners in HR and Business Integration. You’ll operate as a connector across design, product, innovation, brand, and marketplace teams to ensure strategic cohesion."
That's a paragraph.
From "Who We Are Looking For":
"A senior enterprise leader who bridges creative and business worlds. You combine strong design intuition with business acumen, strategic thinking, and exceptional communication and executive influence. You have a track record of building high‑performing, inclusive teams and driving complex, multi‑threaded initiatives that align design vision with company priorities, innovation roadmaps, and marketplace impact."
Then after that there is a line: "Bachelor’s degree in business administration, Economics, Applied Science, or a related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training."
Then "10+ years prior design leadership experience in strategy, innovation-led or future-focused creative studios."
Then a series of statements (looks like bullet points but not formatted with bullets). They are:
- "Proven ability to influence senior leaders and align diverse stakeholder groups to clear decisions."
- "Expertise and proven track record of leading teams at the intersection of design, strategy, and business."
- "Experience working across multiple initiatives and objectives across the enterprise."
- "Expertise in organizational strategy, foresight, and design systems."
- "Demonstrated ability to influence and drive action plans multidisciplinary teams and cross-functional partners effectively."
- "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking."
Note some duplicates: "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." appears earlier too.
We need to preserve all substantive information, but we can deduplicate? The instruction says "do NOT invent or summarize away detail." It doesn't explicitly forbid deduplication, but we should preserve all detail. If we deduplicate, we might be summarizing away duplicate detail. Safer to keep duplicates as they appear? However duplicates may be considered redundant but still detail. The instruction says "Removed duplicated lines" earlier: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove duplicated lines. So we need to detect duplicated lines and remove them. The duplicate line "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." appears twice (once in the "Who We Are Looking For" paragraph? Actually it's in the paragraph: "You combine strong design intuition with business acumen, strategic thinking, and exceptional communication and executive influence." That's not exactly same line. The duplicate line appears later as a separate statement: "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." That's a duplicate of the earlier phrase but not exactly same wording? The earlier phrase: "You combine strong design intuition with business acumen, strategic thinking, and exceptional communication and executive influence." Not identical. The later line is exactly "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." That's not identical to earlier sentence, but similar. The instruction about duplicated lines likely refers to exact duplicate lines. We'll keep both if not exact duplicates.
But there is also "Proven ability to influence senior leaders and align diverse stakeholder groups to clear decisions." appears only once.
"Expertise and proven track record of leading teams at the intersection of design, strategy, and business." appears once.
"Experience working across multiple initiatives and objectives across the enterprise." appears once.
"Expertise in organizational strategy, foresight, and design systems." appears once.
"Demonstrated ability to influence and drive action plans multidisciplinary teams and cross-functional partners effectively." appears once.
Thus we keep all.
Now "What You’ll Work On":
"You will translate Nike’s business vision into actionable design strategies and operating mechanisms, enabling teams to deliver breakthrough consumer experiences. You’ll connect long‑range ambition to near‑term execution and bring clarity, tools, and cadence to how design delivers value across the enterprise."
Then "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate further upstream by translating business and consumer priorities into a clear long-term Design strategy.Connect strategy to product creation, ensuring strategic decisions reflect how Design, creation, and product actually come to life.Shape the organization intentionally, identifying future capability needs, organizational opportunities, redundancies, and resource priorities.Create strategic clarity and prioritization, establishing a portfolio-level view of initiatives and ensuring leadership resources are focused on the highest-value work.Build organizational leadership capability, establish a Design Leadership Effectiveness agenda that equips leaders with the organizational, business and management practices required to translate strategy into high-performing teams, while maintaining clear accountability for people leadership within each functional organization.Strengthen Design’s position as a business partner, enabling Design to proactively shape business decisions rather than primarily respond to them.Translate strategy into action, partnering closely with Operations to turn strategic priorities into tangible initiatives, operating mechanisms, and measurable outcomes.Increase the CDO’s strategic leverage, by ensuring his time and attention are focused on creative vision, product, consumer relevance, future opportunities and business impact, while strategic and organizational execution is actively led."
This is a long paragraph with sentences separated by periods but no spaces after periods? Actually there are missing spaces after periods in the original: "strategy.Connect". We need to preserve the content but we can add spaces for readability? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Adding spaces is not inventing content, just formatting. Probably okay. But we should keep the exact wording? Might be okay to add spaces for readability but not change meaning. Safer to keep as is but we can insert spaces to make readable HTML. However the original missing spaces might be considered part of the content; altering could be considered inventing? It's just formatting. I'd add spaces after periods for readability but not change words.
We'll split into list items for each responsibility. The paragraph contains multiple sentences each starting with a verb: "You will translate Nike’s business vision..." "You’ll connect long‑range ambition..." "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate further upstream..." Actually the "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate" is a heading-like phrase but we can treat as a sentence.
Better to break into list items:
- Translate Nike’s business vision into actionable design strategies and operating mechanisms, enabling teams to deliver breakthrough consumer experiences.
- Connect long‑range ambition to near‑term execution and bring clarity, tools, and cadence to how design delivers value across the enterprise.
- Operate further upstream by translating business and consumer priorities into a clear long-term Design strategy.
- Connect strategy to product creation, ensuring strategic decisions reflect how Design, creation, and product actually come to life.
- Shape the organization intentionally, identifying future capability needs, organizational opportunities, redundancies, and resource priorities.
- Create strategic clarity and prioritization, establishing a portfolio-level view of initiatives and ensuring leadership resources are focused on the highest-value work.
- Build organizational leadership capability, establish a Design Leadership Effectiveness agenda that equips leaders with the organizational, business and management practices required to translate strategy into high-performing teams, while maintaining clear accountability for people leadership within each functional organization.
- Strengthen Design’s position as a business partner, enabling Design to proactively shape business
for prose. Do NOT repeat job title as heading. Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, equal-opportunity, scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it — never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text. Prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. We need to parse the posting content. The posting includes: - "Who You’ll Work With": description of who you'll work with. This could be considered "About the role" or maybe "Responsibilities"? Actually it's about who you'll work with, not responsibilities. Could be part of "About the role" or "Team". But we only have allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We can map content accordingly. - "Who We Are Looking For": description of desired candidate. This could be "Requirements" or "Qualifications". We need to decide. - Then there is a line: "Bachelor’s degree in business administration, Economics, Applied Science, or a related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training." That's qualification. - Then "10+ years prior design leadership experience in strategy, innovation-led or future-focused creative studios." That's requirement. - Then a bunch of bullet-like statements: "Proven ability to influence senior leaders and align diverse stakeholder groups to clear decisions." etc. Those are requirements/qualifications. - Then there is a compliance section: "Compliance Recruiters refer to the Job Levelling Grid on the TA Playbook for education + years of experience US approved Immigration job posting compliance verbiage (choose one): Bachelor’s degree in design management or related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training Master’s degree in design or related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training For US roles, job descriptions should not include any verbiage that reference a requirement to pass a background check for the role. To promote this role to retail talent, please include the tagline- “Mynext: Be Empowered to Grow within Nike and Create the Future”" This is boilerplate/compliance, should be removed. - Then "What You’ll Work On": description of responsibilities. - Then "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate ...": list of responsibilities. - Then "We offer a number of accommodations to complete our interview process including screen readers, sign language interpreters, accessible and single location for in-person interviews, closed captioning, and other reasonable modifications as needed. If you discover, as you navigate our application process, that you need assistance or an accommodation due to a disability, please complete the Candidate Accommodation Request Form." That's about accommodations, maybe part of Benefits? But it's about interview accommodations, not benefits. Could be considered part of "Benefits"? Not exactly. Might be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO but it's about accommodations. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is about accommodations for disability, which might be considered EEO/legal. Probably should remove. Thus we need to extract substantive content: Who you'll work with, Who we are looking for (requirements/qualifications), What you'll work on (responsibilities), plus the list of responsibilities under "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate". Also maybe the bullet list of responsibilities. We need to decide sections. Potential sections: - About the role: could combine "Who You’ll Work With" and maybe a brief overview? But we have "What You’ll Work On" which is responsibilities. So we could have:
About the role
with paragraph describing who you'll work with and the purpose.Responsibilities
with- list of responsibilities from "What You’ll Work On" and the bullet list.
Requirements
with- list of requirements: education, years experience, proven ability to influence, expertise, etc. We could also have Qualifications separate but maybe combine with Requirements. The instruction says prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could have About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements. That's three sections. We must not include Benefits, Pay, Schedule unless present. Not present. We must not repeat job title as heading. We must not include filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We need to preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from the sections we keep. Let's extract details. From "Who You’ll Work With": "You will lead the Design Strategy function and work in close partnership with the Chief Design Officer, Product Creation business leaders and their strategy teams, VP/Creative Directors across Design, Brand Marketing creative leaders, NXT and Innovation leaders, and cross‑functional partners in HR and Business Integration. You’ll operate as a connector across design, product, innovation, brand, and marketplace teams to ensure strategic cohesion." That's a paragraph. From "Who We Are Looking For": "A senior enterprise leader who bridges creative and business worlds. You combine strong design intuition with business acumen, strategic thinking, and exceptional communication and executive influence. You have a track record of building high‑performing, inclusive teams and driving complex, multi‑threaded initiatives that align design vision with company priorities, innovation roadmaps, and marketplace impact." Then after that there is a line: "Bachelor’s degree in business administration, Economics, Applied Science, or a related field. Will accept any suitable combination of education, experience and training." Then "10+ years prior design leadership experience in strategy, innovation-led or future-focused creative studios." Then a series of statements (looks like bullet points but not formatted with bullets). They are: - "Proven ability to influence senior leaders and align diverse stakeholder groups to clear decisions." - "Expertise and proven track record of leading teams at the intersection of design, strategy, and business." - "Experience working across multiple initiatives and objectives across the enterprise." - "Expertise in organizational strategy, foresight, and design systems." - "Demonstrated ability to influence and drive action plans multidisciplinary teams and cross-functional partners effectively." - "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." Note some duplicates: "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." appears earlier too. We need to preserve all substantive information, but we can deduplicate? The instruction says "do NOT invent or summarize away detail." It doesn't explicitly forbid deduplication, but we should preserve all detail. If we deduplicate, we might be summarizing away duplicate detail. Safer to keep duplicates as they appear? However duplicates may be considered redundant but still detail. The instruction says "Removed duplicated lines" earlier: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove duplicated lines. So we need to detect duplicated lines and remove them. The duplicate line "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." appears twice (once in the "Who We Are Looking For" paragraph? Actually it's in the paragraph: "You combine strong design intuition with business acumen, strategic thinking, and exceptional communication and executive influence." That's not exactly same line. The duplicate line appears later as a separate statement: "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." That's a duplicate of the earlier phrase but not exactly same wording? The earlier phrase: "You combine strong design intuition with business acumen, strategic thinking, and exceptional communication and executive influence." Not identical. The later line is exactly "Strong design intuition combined with business acumen and strategic thinking." That's not identical to earlier sentence, but similar. The instruction about duplicated lines likely refers to exact duplicate lines. We'll keep both if not exact duplicates. But there is also "Proven ability to influence senior leaders and align diverse stakeholder groups to clear decisions." appears only once. "Expertise and proven track record of leading teams at the intersection of design, strategy, and business." appears once. "Experience working across multiple initiatives and objectives across the enterprise." appears once. "Expertise in organizational strategy, foresight, and design systems." appears once. "Demonstrated ability to influence and drive action plans multidisciplinary teams and cross-functional partners effectively." appears once. Thus we keep all. Now "What You’ll Work On": "You will translate Nike’s business vision into actionable design strategies and operating mechanisms, enabling teams to deliver breakthrough consumer experiences. You’ll connect long‑range ambition to near‑term execution and bring clarity, tools, and cadence to how design delivers value across the enterprise." Then "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate further upstream by translating business and consumer priorities into a clear long-term Design strategy.Connect strategy to product creation, ensuring strategic decisions reflect how Design, creation, and product actually come to life.Shape the organization intentionally, identifying future capability needs, organizational opportunities, redundancies, and resource priorities.Create strategic clarity and prioritization, establishing a portfolio-level view of initiatives and ensuring leadership resources are focused on the highest-value work.Build organizational leadership capability, establish a Design Leadership Effectiveness agenda that equips leaders with the organizational, business and management practices required to translate strategy into high-performing teams, while maintaining clear accountability for people leadership within each functional organization.Strengthen Design’s position as a business partner, enabling Design to proactively shape business decisions rather than primarily respond to them.Translate strategy into action, partnering closely with Operations to turn strategic priorities into tangible initiatives, operating mechanisms, and measurable outcomes.Increase the CDO’s strategic leverage, by ensuring his time and attention are focused on creative vision, product, consumer relevance, future opportunities and business impact, while strategic and organizational execution is actively led." This is a long paragraph with sentences separated by periods but no spaces after periods? Actually there are missing spaces after periods in the original: "strategy.Connect". We need to preserve the content but we can add spaces for readability? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Adding spaces is not inventing content, just formatting. Probably okay. But we should keep the exact wording? Might be okay to add spaces for readability but not change meaning. Safer to keep as is but we can insert spaces to make readable HTML. However the original missing spaces might be considered part of the content; altering could be considered inventing? It's just formatting. I'd add spaces after periods for readability but not change words. We'll split into list items for each responsibility. The paragraph contains multiple sentences each starting with a verb: "You will translate Nike’s business vision..." "You’ll connect long‑range ambition..." "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate further upstream..." Actually the "Additionally, In This Role You Will Operate" is a heading-like phrase but we can treat as a sentence. Better to break into list items: - Translate Nike’s business vision into actionable design strategies and operating mechanisms, enabling teams to deliver breakthrough consumer experiences. - Connect long‑range ambition to near‑term execution and bring clarity, tools, and cadence to how design delivers value across the enterprise. - Operate further upstream by translating business and consumer priorities into a clear long-term Design strategy. - Connect strategy to product creation, ensuring strategic decisions reflect how Design, creation, and product actually come to life. - Shape the organization intentionally, identifying future capability needs, organizational opportunities, redundancies, and resource priorities. - Create strategic clarity and prioritization, establishing a portfolio-level view of initiatives and ensuring leadership resources are focused on the highest-value work. - Build organizational leadership capability, establish a Design Leadership Effectiveness agenda that equips leaders with the organizational, business and management practices required to translate strategy into high-performing teams, while maintaining clear accountability for people leadership within each functional organization. - Strengthen Design’s position as a business partner, enabling Design to proactively shape business