Security Officer I (Armed)
Castelion · Rio Rancho, NM · 1 mo ago
On-siteOTHRFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings using for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to include only sections that have real specific content. The posting includes: "Why Castelion, Why Now" intro, then "Security Officer I (Armed)" description, then Responsibilities list, Basic Qualifications, Preferred Skills and Experience, Additional Requirements, Physical Demands, Castelion offers a generous benefits package (but details not given), Other Duties, Additional Eligibility Requirements, Affirmative Action/EEO Statement (boilerplate to remove), EAR/ITAR Requirements (maybe keep? It's substantive about export-controlled info). We need to remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. So we should remove Affirmative Action/EEO Statement entirely. Also remove "Other Duties" maybe it's boilerplate? It says "Please note this job description is not designed to cover..." That's generic but maybe still substantive? It's a disclaimer; could be considered boilerplate. The instruction: remove duplicated lines, cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "Other Duties" is a typical disclaimer; might be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. Safer to keep? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." "Other Duties" is not exactly those categories, but it's a generic disclaimer. Might be okay to keep as part of description? However we should aim to keep substantive info. The "Other Duties" is generic; could be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. I'd keep it as a paragraph under maybe "Additional Information". But we need to follow headings: we can have sections like About the role (intro), Responsibilities, Requirements (maybe combine Basic Qualifications and Additional Requirements?), Qualifications (maybe Preferred Skills and Experience?), Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide which sections have content.
Let's extract:
- About the role: The intro "Why Castelion, Why Now" plus description of role: "The Security Officer I (Armed) on the Physical Security team at Castelion is responsible for protecting personnel, facilities, assets, and operations through armed security presence, access control enforcement, patrol activities and incident response. In this role, you will maintain proficiency with assigned weapons and security equipment, control access to designated areas, conduct interior and exterior patrols, respond to security incidents and emergencies, and support the protection of advanced defense technologies and critical manufacturing operations." That's substantive.
- Responsibilities: list bullet points.
- Requirements: Basic Qualifications (list). Also Additional Requirements (list). Could combine under Requirements.
- Qualifications: Preferred Skills and Experience (list). Could be under Qualifications or Skills. The instruction says use headings like Qualifications, Skills. We could put Preferred Skills and Experience under Skills.
- Benefits: "Castelion offers a generous benefits package. Please refer to the bottom of our Careers page for more details." This is vague; not specific details. According to rule: never create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It states there is a generous benefits package but no details. That's vague; maybe we should not create Benefits section because no specific content. The rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It states there is a benefits package but no details; still states them? It says "Castelion offers a generous benefits package." That's a statement but no specifics. Might be considered stating them, but it's vague. Safer to omit Benefits section because no concrete details.
- Pay: not mentioned.
- Schedule: not mentioned (though mentions 12-hour shift, days, nights, overtime, weekends, rotating schedules). That is schedule info! It says "Ability to wear approximately 20-30 pounds of gear throughout a 12-hour shift, to include; days, nights, overtime, weekends and rotating schedules as required." That indicates schedule expectations. So we could create a Schedule section with that detail. However the rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state schedule expectations (12-hour shift, days, nights, overtime, weekends, rotating schedules). So we can include Schedule.
Thus sections: About the role (h3), Responsibilities (h3), Requirements (h3) (combining Basic Qualifications and Additional Requirements), Skills (h3) (Preferred Skills and Experience), Schedule (h3) (shift details). Possibly also Physical Demands? Could be part of Requirements or separate? Could be under Requirements as well. But we have limited headings; we could add a section for Physical Demands if we want. But we should prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Physical Demands is substantive; could be included under Requirements or as its own section. Might be better to include under Requirements as bullet list.
Additional Eligibility Requirements (clearance, export control) is substantive; could be under Requirements or its own section like "Eligibility". But we have limited headings; we could add a section "Requirements" that includes all: Basic Qualifications, Additional Requirements, Physical Demands, Additional Eligibility Requirements, EAR/ITAR Requirements. That may be too many but still one section.
Better to split: Requirements (Basic Qualifications + Additional Requirements), Qualifications (Preferred Skills and Experience), Physical Demands (maybe as its own), Eligibility (Additional Eligibility Requirements + EAR/ITAR). But we must avoid too many thin sections. However each has decent content.
Let's decide: We'll create sections:
- About the role (intro)
- Responsibilities
- Requirements (Basic Qualifications + Additional Requirements)
- Skills (Preferred Skills and Experience)
- Physical Demands
- Eligibility (Additional Eligibility Requirements + EAR/ITAR)
- Schedule (shift details)
That's 7 sections. Might be okay but some could be thin. Let's examine each content length.
About the role: decent paragraph.
Responsibilities: list of 5 items.
Requirements: Basic Qualifications (list of 5 items) + Additional Requirements (list of 5 items) = 10 items.
Skills: Preferred Skills and Experience (list of 5 items).
Physical Demands: list of 5 items.
Eligibility: Additional Eligibility Requirements (paragraph about clearance) + EAR/ITAR Requirements (paragraph about export control). That's two paragraphs.
Schedule: mention of 12-hour shift, days, nights, overtime, weekends, rotating schedules.
All have decent content.
Thus we can output.
We must not repeat job title as heading. So no
for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to include only sections that have real specific content. The posting includes: "Why Castelion, Why Now" intro, then "Security Officer I (Armed)" description, then Responsibilities list, Basic Qualifications, Preferred Skills and Experience, Additional Requirements, Physical Demands, Castelion offers a generous benefits package (but details not given), Other Duties, Additional Eligibility Requirements, Affirmative Action/EEO Statement (boilerplate to remove), EAR/ITAR Requirements (maybe keep? It's substantive about export-controlled info). We need to remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. So we should remove Affirmative Action/EEO Statement entirely. Also remove "Other Duties" maybe it's boilerplate? It says "Please note this job description is not designed to cover..." That's generic but maybe still substantive? It's a disclaimer; could be considered boilerplate. The instruction: remove duplicated lines, cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "Other Duties" is a typical disclaimer; might be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. Safer to keep? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." "Other Duties" is not exactly those categories, but it's a generic disclaimer. Might be okay to keep as part of description? However we should aim to keep substantive info. The "Other Duties" is generic; could be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. I'd keep it as a paragraph under maybe "Additional Information". But we need to follow headings: we can have sections like About the role (intro), Responsibilities, Requirements (maybe combine Basic Qualifications and Additional Requirements?), Qualifications (maybe Preferred Skills and Experience?), Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide which sections have content.
Let's extract:
- About the role: The intro "Why Castelion, Why Now" plus description of role: "The Security Officer I (Armed) on the Physical Security team at Castelion is responsible for protecting personnel, facilities, assets, and operations through armed security presence, access control enforcement, patrol activities and incident response. In this role, you will maintain proficiency with assigned weapons and security equipment, control access to designated areas, conduct interior and exterior patrols, respond to security incidents and emergencies, and support the protection of advanced defense technologies and critical manufacturing operations." That's substantive.
- Responsibilities: list bullet points.
- Requirements: Basic Qualifications (list). Also Additional Requirements (list). Could combine under Requirements.
- Qualifications: Preferred Skills and Experience (list). Could be under Qualifications or Skills. The instruction says use headings like Qualifications, Skills. We could put Preferred Skills and Experience under Skills.
- Benefits: "Castelion offers a generous benefits package. Please refer to the bottom of our Careers page for more details." This is vague; not specific details. According to rule: never create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It states there is a generous benefits package but no details. That's vague; maybe we should not create Benefits section because no specific content. The rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It states there is a benefits package but no details; still states them? It says "Castelion offers a generous benefits package." That's a statement but no specifics. Might be considered stating them, but it's vague. Safer to omit Benefits section because no concrete details.
- Pay: not mentioned.
- Schedule: not mentioned (though mentions 12-hour shift, days, nights, overtime, weekends, rotating schedules). That is schedule info! It says "Ability to wear approximately 20-30 pounds of gear throughout a 12-hour shift, to include; days, nights, overtime, weekends and rotating schedules as required." That indicates schedule expectations. So we could create a Schedule section with that detail. However the rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state schedule expectations (12-hour shift, days, nights, overtime, weekends, rotating schedules). So we can include Schedule.
Thus sections: About the role (h3), Responsibilities (h3), Requirements (h3) (combining Basic Qualifications and Additional Requirements), Skills (h3) (Preferred Skills and Experience), Schedule (h3) (shift details). Possibly also Physical Demands? Could be part of Requirements or separate? Could be under Requirements as well. But we have limited headings; we could add a section for Physical Demands if we want. But we should prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Physical Demands is substantive; could be included under Requirements or as its own section. Might be better to include under Requirements as bullet list.
Additional Eligibility Requirements (clearance, export control) is substantive; could be under Requirements or its own section like "Eligibility". But we have limited headings; we could add a section "Requirements" that includes all: Basic Qualifications, Additional Requirements, Physical Demands, Additional Eligibility Requirements, EAR/ITAR Requirements. That may be too many but still one section.
Better to split: Requirements (Basic Qualifications + Additional Requirements), Qualifications (Preferred Skills and Experience), Physical Demands (maybe as its own), Eligibility (Additional Eligibility Requirements + EAR/ITAR). But we must avoid too many thin sections. However each has decent content.
Let's decide: We'll create sections:
- About the role (intro)
- Responsibilities
- Requirements (Basic Qualifications + Additional Requirements)
- Skills (Preferred Skills and Experience)
- Physical Demands
- Eligibility (Additional Eligibility Requirements + EAR/ITAR)
- Schedule (shift details)
That's 7 sections. Might be okay but some could be thin. Let's examine each content length.
About the role: decent paragraph.
Responsibilities: list of 5 items.
Requirements: Basic Qualifications (list of 5 items) + Additional Requirements (list of 5 items) = 10 items.
Skills: Preferred Skills and Experience (list of 5 items).
Physical Demands: list of 5 items.
Eligibility: Additional Eligibility Requirements (paragraph about clearance) + EAR/ITAR Requirements (paragraph about export control). That's two paragraphs.
Schedule: mention of 12-hour shift, days, nights, overtime, weekends, rotating schedules.
All have decent content.
Thus we can output.
We must not repeat job title as heading. So no Security Officer I (Armed)
. Use headings for sections only.
We need to wrap content in appropriate tags: - for lists,
for prose.
We must not include markdown fences.
Let's craft.
First, About the role: combine the intro "Why Castelion, Why Now" paragraph plus role description. Provide as
maybe multiple paragraphs.
We'll output:
About the role
Why Castelion, Why Now Castelion is moving incredibly fast to develop and deliver advanced defense systems at a time when execution matters more than ever. We believe focus, ownership, and excellence are decisive advantages - and we're building a world-class team to turn bold ideas into real capability. This is a rare opportunity to join at an early stage, where you'll have significant ownership, collaborate with exceptional teammates, and make a direct, measurable impact on our mission and the future of the company - regardless of your function.
The Security Officer I (Armed) on the Physical Security team at Castelion is responsible for protecting personnel, facilities, assets, and operations through armed security presence, access control enforcement, patrol activities and incident response. In this role, you will maintain proficiency with assigned weapons and security equipment, control access to designated areas, conduct interior and exterior patrols, respond to security incidents and emergencies, and support the protection of advanced defense technologies and critical manufacturing operations.
Then Responsibilities:
Responsibilities
- Control access at designated security posts and verify employee, visitor, and contractor vehicle credentials.
- Conduct armed interior and exterior patrols of facilities, parking areas, the site perimeter, and restricted locations.
- Monitor security systems, alarms, cameras, and access control platforms and respond appropriately to security incidents.
- Identify, observe, document, and report suspicious activity, security violations, safety hazards, and facility concerns.
- Respond as an armed security officer to alarms, medical incidents, security threats, and emergencies in accordance with established response and use-of-force procedures.
Requirements: combine Basic Qualifications and Additional Requirements.
Basic Qualifications list:
- High school Diploma or GED
- 2+ years of experience in armed security, military, law enforcement, corrections, emergency services, or a related protective security field.
- Ability to observe, assess, and respond appropriately to security and safety concerns.
- Must possess or be able to obtain and maintain all New Mexico licenses, registrations, and firearms qualifications required to perform armed security duties.
- Valid driver’s license and ability to operate company vehicles if required.
Additional Requirements list:
- Ability to maintain a professional and visible security presence.
- Ability to wear approximately 20-30 pounds of gear throughout a 12-hour shift, to include; days, nights, overtime, weekends and rotating schedules as required.
- Must obtain and maintain all company required firearms, use-of-force, defensive tactics, less than lethal, and emergency response qualifications.
- This role is based in Rio Rancho, NM and requires full-time onsite presence.
- Must successfully pass a background investigation and any required pre-employment screening.
We'll put them together in one maybe with all items.
Requirements
- High school Diploma or GED
- 2+ years of experience in armed security, military, law enforcement, corrections, emergency services, or a related protective security field.
- Ability to observe, assess, and respond appropriately to security and safety concerns.
- Must possess or be able to obtain and maintain all New Mexico licenses, registrations, and firearms qualifications required to perform armed security duties.
- Valid driver’s license and ability to operate company vehicles if required.
- Ability to maintain a professional and visible security presence.
- Ability to wear approximately 20-30 pounds of gear throughout a 12-hour shift, to include; days, nights, overtime, weekends and rotating schedules as required.
- Must obtain and maintain all company required firearms, use-of-force, defensive tactics, less than lethal, and emergency response qualifications.
- This role is based in Rio Rancho, NM and requires full-time onsite presence.
- Must successfully pass a background investigation and any required pre-employment screening.
Skills: Preferred Skills and Experience list.
Skills
- 2+ years of experience in aerospace, defense, manufacturing, critical infrastructure, or industrial environments.
- Experience conducting armed patrols, incident response, investigations, and emergency response.
- Experience operating CCTV, access control, intrusion detection, alarm monitoring, and security communications systems.
- Current CPR/AED, First Aid, Stop the bleed, firearms, defense tactics, or other applicable security certifications
Physical Demands list.
Physical Demands
- Ability to stand and walk for extended periods throughout a 12-hour shift.
- Ability to patrol large indoor and outdoor areas, climb stairs and navigate uneven terrain.
- Ability to lift, carry, push, and pull up to 50 pounds.
- Ability to work outdoors
for prose. We must not include markdown fences. Let's craft. First, About the role: combine the intro "Why Castelion, Why Now" paragraph plus role description. Provide as
maybe multiple paragraphs. We'll output:
About the role
Why Castelion, Why Now Castelion is moving incredibly fast to develop and deliver advanced defense systems at a time when execution matters more than ever. We believe focus, ownership, and excellence are decisive advantages - and we're building a world-class team to turn bold ideas into real capability. This is a rare opportunity to join at an early stage, where you'll have significant ownership, collaborate with exceptional teammates, and make a direct, measurable impact on our mission and the future of the company - regardless of your function.
The Security Officer I (Armed) on the Physical Security team at Castelion is responsible for protecting personnel, facilities, assets, and operations through armed security presence, access control enforcement, patrol activities and incident response. In this role, you will maintain proficiency with assigned weapons and security equipment, control access to designated areas, conduct interior and exterior patrols, respond to security incidents and emergencies, and support the protection of advanced defense technologies and critical manufacturing operations.
Then Responsibilities:Responsibilities
- Control access at designated security posts and verify employee, visitor, and contractor vehicle credentials.
- Conduct armed interior and exterior patrols of facilities, parking areas, the site perimeter, and restricted locations.
- Monitor security systems, alarms, cameras, and access control platforms and respond appropriately to security incidents.
- Identify, observe, document, and report suspicious activity, security violations, safety hazards, and facility concerns.
- Respond as an armed security officer to alarms, medical incidents, security threats, and emergencies in accordance with established response and use-of-force procedures.
- maybe with all items.
- High school Diploma or GED
- 2+ years of experience in armed security, military, law enforcement, corrections, emergency services, or a related protective security field.
- Ability to observe, assess, and respond appropriately to security and safety concerns.
- Must possess or be able to obtain and maintain all New Mexico licenses, registrations, and firearms qualifications required to perform armed security duties.
- Valid driver’s license and ability to operate company vehicles if required.
- Ability to maintain a professional and visible security presence.
- Ability to wear approximately 20-30 pounds of gear throughout a 12-hour shift, to include; days, nights, overtime, weekends and rotating schedules as required.
- Must obtain and maintain all company required firearms, use-of-force, defensive tactics, less than lethal, and emergency response qualifications.
- This role is based in Rio Rancho, NM and requires full-time onsite presence.
- Must successfully pass a background investigation and any required pre-employment screening.
- 2+ years of experience in aerospace, defense, manufacturing, critical infrastructure, or industrial environments.
- Experience conducting armed patrols, incident response, investigations, and emergency response.
- Experience operating CCTV, access control, intrusion detection, alarm monitoring, and security communications systems.
- Current CPR/AED, First Aid, Stop the bleed, firearms, defense tactics, or other applicable security certifications
- Ability to stand and walk for extended periods throughout a 12-hour shift.
- Ability to patrol large indoor and outdoor areas, climb stairs and navigate uneven terrain.
- Ability to lift, carry, push, and pull up to 50 pounds.
- Ability to work outdoors