Risk and Resilience Engineer
for section headings. Use - for lists. Use
for prose.
We need to decide which sections to include: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Skills, Benefits, Pay. Possibly Qualifications not needed if covered by Requirements. But we could include Qualifications if there is distinct content. The "What We’re Looking For" could be Requirements. The "Your Skills And Experience..." could be Skills. The "What Will Make You Stand Out" could be additional Skills or Qualifications. We'll treat as Skills.
Thus sections:
- About the role (intro paragraph)
- Responsibilities (list)
- Requirements (the "What We’re Looking For" paragraph)
- Skills (combined "Your Skills And Experience..." and "What Will Make You Stand Out")
- Benefits (list of benefits from About MSCI)
- Pay (salary range and bonus)
We should not include Schedule as no explicit schedule.
Now we need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not omit details.
We need to convert paragraphs into
. For lists, each bullet becomes
- .
We need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like EEO, legal, scam warning, etc. Remove those.
Now let's craft HTML.
First, About the role: combine the paragraph(s) before responsibilities. It includes a URL? It includes "https://careers.msci.com/life-at-msci". That's a link; we should preserve as is? Probably keep as plain text; we could wrap in but not required. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep the URL as plain text. It's okay.
Thus About the role
containing that paragraph.
Now Responsibilities
with each bullet.
Now Requirements containing the "What We’re Looking For" paragraph.
Now Skills: need to combine two parts.
First part: "Your Skills And Experience That Will Help You Excel What You’ll Bring" then list of bullet-like sentences? Actually it's a paragraph with many items separated by periods. Let's extract that section:
"Ph.D. preferred, or a Master’s degree with 3 - 5+ years of relevant experience in structural engineering, civil engineering, operations research, resilience engineering, catastrophe risk, or a related quantitative field.Structural Degree or Civil Engineering (with a structural focus).Strong technical foundation in vulnerability and loss modeling, statistics, probabilistic methods, and quantitative analysis, with the ability to translate complex physical processes into robust analytical models.Hands-on experience developing risk, vulnerability, or loss models for buildings and infrastructure, using engineering-based approaches, statistical methods, machine learning, or a combination of these techniques.Demonstrated ability to develop loss models from the ground up, from defining the underlying methodology and sourcing appropriate data through calibration, validation, uncertainty quantification, and implementation.Experience working with multi-hazard and catastrophe risk data, including hazard intensity measures, building-level damage and loss observations, exposure datasets, construction characteristics, and repair or construction cost data.Experience developing scalable and generalizable catastrophe risk models that can be applied across large portfolios, diverse asset types, and multiple geographic regions.Advanced proficiency in Python or comparable scientific programming languages, with experience developing reliable, maintainable, and reproducible analytical workflows.A rigorous, science-driven approach to model development, with a strong emphasis on accuracy, reliability, transparency, validation, and reproducibility.Strong understanding of the current research landscape in resilience, vulnerability, catastrophe risk, and loss modeling, including relevant engineering standards, technical guidelines, and emerging methodologies.Experience applying machine learning and AI techniques to engineering, risk, resilience, or other scientific modeling problems.Experience analyzing large and complex datasets in high-performance computing environments, either on-premises or using cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, or Azure.Proficiency with collaborative software development practices and version control systems such as Git.A strong record of scientific research and publication, demonstrating the ability to conduct rigorous technical work and communicate complex methodologies and findings clearly."
Note there are no spaces after periods; but we can keep as is.
Second part: "What Will Make You Stand Out We are especially interested in candidates who combine deep technical expertise with the ability to operate in areas where established datasets or methodologies may not yet exist. You know how to move from first principles to a working model, make thoughtful assumptions when evidence is limited, test those assumptions against available data, and communicate uncertainty clearly. Experience building property-level loss models from scratch, working across multiple natural hazards, or developing models that connect physical damage and recovery to financial outcomes will be particularly valuable."
We'll combine both into a single
maybe? But they are not bullet list originally; they are sentences. Could treat as paragraphs. However instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. For skills, it's not a list but a paragraph of items. Could still use
. But we could also split into
if we treat each sentence as item. However the instruction says use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Skills is not explicitly a list; but we could still use
. Safer to use
for skills section.
Thus Skills
containing both paragraphs combined (maybe separated by a space).
Now Benefits: need to extract from "About MSCI What we offer you". Let's pull that paragraph:
"Salary range: $102,000 - $133,000 / year.Plus eligible for annual bonus.Transparent compensation schemes and comprehensive employee benefits, tailored to your location, ensuring your financial security, health, and overall wellbeing.Flexible working arrangements, advanced technology, and collaborative workspaces.A culture of high performance and innovation where we experiment with new ideas and take responsibility for achieving results.A global network of talented colleagues, who inspire, support, and share their expertise to innovate and deliver for our clients.Global Orientation program to kickstart your journey, followed by access to our Learning@MSCI platform, AI Learning Center , LinkedIn Learning Pro and tailored learning opportunities for ongoing
for prose. We need to decide which sections to include: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Skills, Benefits, Pay. Possibly Qualifications not needed if covered by Requirements. But we could include Qualifications if there is distinct content. The "What We’re Looking For" could be Requirements. The "Your Skills And Experience..." could be Skills. The "What Will Make You Stand Out" could be additional Skills or Qualifications. We'll treat as Skills. Thus sections: - About the role (intro paragraph) - Responsibilities (list) - Requirements (the "What We’re Looking For" paragraph) - Skills (combined "Your Skills And Experience..." and "What Will Make You Stand Out") - Benefits (list of benefits from About MSCI) - Pay (salary range and bonus) We should not include Schedule as no explicit schedule. Now we need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not omit details. We need to convert paragraphs into
. For lists, each bullet becomes
containing that paragraph. Now Responsibilities
- with each bullet.
Now Requirements
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. For skills, it's not a list but a paragraph of items. Could still use
. But we could also split into
- if we treat each sentence as item. However the instruction says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Skills is not explicitly a list; but we could still use
. Safer to use
for skills section. Thus Skills
containing both paragraphs combined (maybe separated by a space). Now Benefits: need to extract from "About MSCI What we offer you". Let's pull that paragraph: "Salary range: $102,000 - $133,000 / year.Plus eligible for annual bonus.Transparent compensation schemes and comprehensive employee benefits, tailored to your location, ensuring your financial security, health, and overall wellbeing.Flexible working arrangements, advanced technology, and collaborative workspaces.A culture of high performance and innovation where we experiment with new ideas and take responsibility for achieving results.A global network of talented colleagues, who inspire, support, and share their expertise to innovate and deliver for our clients.Global Orientation program to kickstart your journey, followed by access to our Learning@MSCI platform, AI Learning Center , LinkedIn Learning Pro and tailored learning opportunities for ongoing
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Skills is not explicitly a list; but we could still use
containing the "What We’re Looking For" paragraph. Now Skills: need to combine two parts. First part: "Your Skills And Experience That Will Help You Excel What You’ll Bring" then list of bullet-like sentences? Actually it's a paragraph with many items separated by periods. Let's extract that section: "Ph.D. preferred, or a Master’s degree with 3 - 5+ years of relevant experience in structural engineering, civil engineering, operations research, resilience engineering, catastrophe risk, or a related quantitative field.Structural Degree or Civil Engineering (with a structural focus).Strong technical foundation in vulnerability and loss modeling, statistics, probabilistic methods, and quantitative analysis, with the ability to translate complex physical processes into robust analytical models.Hands-on experience developing risk, vulnerability, or loss models for buildings and infrastructure, using engineering-based approaches, statistical methods, machine learning, or a combination of these techniques.Demonstrated ability to develop loss models from the ground up, from defining the underlying methodology and sourcing appropriate data through calibration, validation, uncertainty quantification, and implementation.Experience working with multi-hazard and catastrophe risk data, including hazard intensity measures, building-level damage and loss observations, exposure datasets, construction characteristics, and repair or construction cost data.Experience developing scalable and generalizable catastrophe risk models that can be applied across large portfolios, diverse asset types, and multiple geographic regions.Advanced proficiency in Python or comparable scientific programming languages, with experience developing reliable, maintainable, and reproducible analytical workflows.A rigorous, science-driven approach to model development, with a strong emphasis on accuracy, reliability, transparency, validation, and reproducibility.Strong understanding of the current research landscape in resilience, vulnerability, catastrophe risk, and loss modeling, including relevant engineering standards, technical guidelines, and emerging methodologies.Experience applying machine learning and AI techniques to engineering, risk, resilience, or other scientific modeling problems.Experience analyzing large and complex datasets in high-performance computing environments, either on-premises or using cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, or Azure.Proficiency with collaborative software development practices and version control systems such as Git.A strong record of scientific research and publication, demonstrating the ability to conduct rigorous technical work and communicate complex methodologies and findings clearly." Note there are no spaces after periods; but we can keep as is. Second part: "What Will Make You Stand Out We are especially interested in candidates who combine deep technical expertise with the ability to operate in areas where established datasets or methodologies may not yet exist. You know how to move from first principles to a working model, make thoughtful assumptions when evidence is limited, test those assumptions against available data, and communicate uncertainty clearly. Experience building property-level loss models from scratch, working across multiple natural hazards, or developing models that connect physical damage and recovery to financial outcomes will be particularly valuable." We'll combine both into a single
- maybe? But they are not bullet list originally; they are sentences. Could treat as
paragraphs. However instruction: Use