Research Associate II, Chemist

We need to output only HTML fragment, no /. Use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Include sections only if posting has real specific content. We need to parse job description. Key content: - Job description paragraph: description of role, tasks, responsibilities. - Required Qualifications: list. - Preferred Qualifications: list. - Overtime Status Exempt: Not eligible for overtime - Appointment Type Restricted - Salary Information $60,000 - $70,000; commensurate with experience - Hours per week 40 - Review Date 10/12/2026 - Additional Information: criminal conviction check. - About Virginia Tech: description. We need to remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. The "About Virginia Tech" is not boilerplate? It's generic but maybe considered boilerplate? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The "About Virginia Tech" is not those; it's about the institution. Might keep? It's not required but could be considered generic. However, we need to preserve all substantive information. The "About Virginia Tech" is substantive about employer. Likely keep as a section maybe "About the Employer"? But we only have allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. No "About the Employer". Could we put it under "About the role"? Probably not. Could we omit? The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." We could include a section "About the role" that includes description of role and maybe also employer info? But "About the role" is for role description. Employer info maybe not needed. However, we need to preserve ALL substantive information; we cannot drop the Virginia Tech description unless it's considered boilerplate. It's not EEO etc. It's generic but still substantive about employer. The allowed headings don't include a section for employer. Could we incorporate it into "About the role" as a paragraph? Might be okay. We need to decide sections: - About the role: could contain the initial job description paragraph (the narrative about what the individual will do). That seems appropriate. - Responsibilities: could list duties: become familiar with methods, organize work, set up and validate assay methods, analyze samples, routine maintenance of HPLC/GC, troubleshooting, operate sample prep equipment, provide technical expertise to junior staff, assist with food sample prep, assist PI with publications, etc. - Requirements: maybe combine Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications? But we have separate headings: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have multiple sections. We need to decide what goes where. Typically: - About the role: overview. - Responsibilities: list of duties. - Requirements: maybe required qualifications (education, experience). - Qualifications: maybe preferred qualifications? Or could be skills. - Skills: maybe specific technical skills. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's map: Required Qualifications: Master's degree or bachelor's with 3 years experience, extensive hands-on experience with GC, LC, automated chromatography software, experience with lipid extraction, SPE, gravimetric, routine maintenance/troubleshooting of GC/HPLC, experience in quantitative analysis of food samples for organic nutrients particularly lipids, demonstrable understanding of QC and method validation, competence in statistical analysis and use of Microsoft Excel, knowledge of QA/QC, experienced with SOPs writing/implementation, ability to work independently, ability to communicate effectively, organized, attention to detail, ability to lift >25 lbs, ability to work with hazardous materials, standing/walking/stooping/bending. Preferred Qualifications: experience with GC-MS, training/supervising lab staff, experience with quantitative analysis of fatty acids, total lipid, sterols, vitamin C, vitamin D, dietary fiber. Skills: maybe communication, independent work, etc. But we already have those in required. Maybe we can combine Required Qualifications into "Requirements" and Preferred Qualifications into "Qualifications". Then "Skills" could be something like "Communication, problem-solving, etc." But we might duplicate. Better: Use "Requirements" for required qualifications, "Qualifications" for preferred qualifications, and "Skills" for specific technical skills (e.g., GC, HPLC, SOP writing, data analysis, etc.) but that may duplicate. Given limited headings, we can produce: - About the role (overview paragraph) - Responsibilities (list of duties) - Requirements (required qualifications) - Qualifications (preferred qualifications) - Skills (maybe communication, independent work, attention to detail, ability to lift, etc.) but we could also put those under Requirements. But we need to avoid filler. Let's think: The posting already includes many skill-like items in Required Qualifications. If we put them under Requirements, we can omit Skills section. Alternatively, we could put Required Qualifications under Requirements, Preferred under Qualifications, and then maybe Skills could be omitted. But we need to include Pay and Schedule sections if present. Pay: Salary Information $60,000 - $70,000; commensurate with experience. Since it says "commensurate with experience", that is a placeholder? The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The posting states salary range $60,000 - $70,000; commensurate with experience. The range is specific, but the phrase "commensurate with experience" is filler. However, we still have actual numbers. Should we include Pay section? The posting states salary info, so we should include Pay section with the range. The phrase "commensurate with experience" is filler but we can still include the range. We could phrase as "$60,000 - $70,000 per year". That's substantive. Schedule: Hours per week 40. That's specific. So we can include Schedule section with "40 hours per week". Benefits: Not mentioned. So omit Benefits. Now, we also have Review Date 10/12/2026 and Additional Information about criminal conviction check. Where to put? Could be under About the role or maybe a separate section like "Additional Information". But not in allowed headings. Could incorporate into About the role or Responsibilities? Probably better to add a short paragraph under About the role or maybe a separate section "Additional Information" but not allowed. Since we must only use allowed headings, we need to fit it somewhere. Could add a paragraph under About the role after description. Or maybe under Responsibilities? The criminal conviction check is a condition of employment, not a responsibility. Could be under Requirements? It's a requirement. Could add as a bullet under Requirements. Review Date: maybe not needed; could be omitted as metadata. The instruction: do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it. Review Date is minor metadata; we can drop it or put in a short p. Probably drop it. Now, About Virginia Tech description: Could be included under About the role as a paragraph about employer. Or we could add a separate section "About the Employer" but not allowed. So we incorporate into About the role. Thus final HTML:

About the role

... description ...

Responsibilities

• ...
...

Requirements

• Master’s degree or bachelor's with a minimum of 3-years post-degree experience in chemistry, biology, biochemistry, food chemistry, or a closely related field.
• Extensive hands-on experience with gas chromatography, liquid chromatography, and automated chromatography software for quantitative analysis of components in biological materials, preferably nutrients in foods.
• Experience with a variety of analytical techniques and equipment, including lipid extraction, solid phase extraction, gravimetric analysis.
• Experience and competence in performing routine maintenance and troubleshooting of GC and HPLC systems.
• Experience in all steps of quantitative analysis of food samples for organic nutrients particularly lipids (including sterols, fatty acids).
• Demonstrable understanding of quality control and method validation criteria and ability to consistently produce data with accuracy and precision.
• Competence in statistical analysis of data and use of Microsoft Excel for analysis and presentation of data.
• Knowledge of and experience in application of quality control/quality assurance in quantitative analytical chemistry processes and data.
• Experienced with Standard Operating Procedures (writing, implementation) and documentation.
• Demonstrated ability to work independently to organize work to meet project timelines.
• Ability to communicate effectively with the PI to discuss ideas, plans, and results.
• Organized, with attention to detail in documentation and analytical rigor.
• Ability to lift and move equipment over 25 pounds.
• Ability to work with hazardous materials, and standing, walking, stooping and bending for long periods.
• Successful candidate will be required to have a criminal conviction check.

Qualifications

• Experience with GC-MS operation and data interpretation.
• Experience training and supervising laboratory staff.
• Experience with quantitative analysis of fatty acids, total lipid, sterols, vitamin C, vitamin D, and/or dietary fiber.

Pay

$60,000 - $70,000 per year (commensurate with experience)

Schedule

40 hours per week

We need to ensure we didn't repeat job title as heading. We didn't. We need to ensure we didn't include boilerplate like EEO etc. We omitted. We need to ensure we didn't include application instructions. We omitted. We need to preserve all substantive information: Did we miss anything? Let's check original: - Job Description paragraph: includes many details about tasks. We captured some in Responsibilities but maybe missed some nuance: "After consultation with the PI about project goals, be expected to become familiar with the analytical methods and components being analyzed, the chemistry involved, and organize work to systematically set up and validate assay methods (initially, starting from established SOPs for assays not currently being run (analysis of phytosterols, fatty acids, vitamin D, vitamin C in foods) but needing to be brought back online for analysis of research study samples, and then to analyze samples. Later the work might involve setting up new methods, and contributing to research on methodology. The methods involve liquid/liquid extraction, solid phase extraction, precise gravimetric measurements, and quantitative HPLC and GC analysis. The person will be responsible for routine maintenance and operation of two HPLC and two GC instruments, including troubleshooting analytical issues, and must have experience and competence actually doing this. The individual will also be responsible for a variety of sample preparation equipment (including homogenizers, sonicators, centrifuges, evaporators, solid phase extraction apparatus, gas cylinders, fume hoods, dry baths, vacuum and forced air ovens, analytical balances, shakers, water baths, etc.), and will provide technical expertise to junior staff, assist as needed with food sample preparation and and control materials, as well as assist the PI with publications. This work is part of sponsored research that would be performed for one year, starting at the end of September 2026. Because of the timeframe and deliverables required (i.e. results for samples and need for someone