Regulatory Analyst

We need to output only need to output HTML fragment with sections for substantive content: About the role (maybe from description), Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only sections that have real specific content. Let's parse the posting. We need to remove boilerplate: EEO, navigation, legal, etc. Also remove application instructions, etc. Keep substantive info: job description and duties, special requirements (SOQ), etc. We need headings:

for each section. We need to decide which sections have content. From posting: - Working Title: Regulatory Analyst - Classification: PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY ANALYST II $7,269.00 - $9,094.00 - Salary range given. - Work Location: Sacramento County Telework: Hybrid - Job Type: Permanent, Full Time - Department Information: Energy Division/ Building Decarbonization and Gas Policy Branch: description. - Job Description And Duties: includes description of role, tasks, etc. - Special Requirements: SOQ questions. - Also mention: "Effective July 1, 2025, CalHR launched the Personal Leave Program (PLP) 2025 with Pay Differential 386. PLP 2025 temporarily reduces state employee pay in exchange for leave hours to help address budget shortfalls. Salary ranges in this posting exclude the temporary reduction." That's about pay/benefits? Might be considered Pay section? It mentions pay differential but it's a temporary reduction. Not exactly benefits. Could include Pay section with salary range and note about PLP. - Benefits: Not explicitly listed besides maybe PLP? Not typical benefits like health, retirement. Not given. So we should not create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It does not list benefits like health, dental, etc. So skip Benefits. - Schedule: Not explicitly stated besides "Permanent, Full Time". Could infer schedule full-time but not specific hours. Not given. So we should not create Schedule section unless posting actually states them. It does not give schedule details. So skip Schedule. - Pay: we have salary range. Also mention PLP. So we can create Pay section with that info. - Responsibilities: from Job Description And Duties: we can extract duties. - Requirements: from Special Requirements (SOQ) and maybe eligibility etc. Also mention Minimum Qualifications etc. We'll include Requirements. - Qualifications: maybe overlapping with Requirements. Could combine? But we need to follow instruction: use headings for sections if posting has real specific content. We could have Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Pay. But we need to avoid thin sections. Let's see what content we have for each. Responsibilities: we have description of duties: conduct analyzes, advise decisionmakers, balance climate goals with gas safety, reliability, affordability; work in sections; etc. Requirements: eligibility, need to have eligibility, etc. Also mention "Individuals interested in applying for this vacancy must have eligibility." Also mention "If you are new to state service or need to gain eligibility..." etc. Also mention "Applicants may choose to apply through either the Standard or LEAP process." Also mention "You will find additional information about the job in the Duty Statement." Also mention "Special Requirements Prepare and submit a response for each question below." That's more like application requirement. Qualifications: maybe mention classification specification, minimum qualifications, etc. Not detailed. Skills: maybe mention clear communicator, pragmatic problem-solver, team environment, technical, economic, financial, policy research and analysis, writing reports, briefing documents, legislative analyses, cooperative working relationships. We could combine Skills into Requirements or Qualifications. But we need to decide. Given instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could have sections: About the role (maybe from department info), Responsibilities, Requirements (including eligibility, SOQ, skills), Pay. That's four sections. We must not repeat job title as heading. Already not. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. We must preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from the posting that are substantive, not just summary. But we cannot just copy paragraphs; we need to format with

and

• for lists. We need to extract lists: The posting includes bullet-like sentences but not explicit bullet list with
  . We need to convert any list of duties/requirements/benefits into
  • . Identify enumerated items. Let's parse the substantive content: - Department Information: "Energy Division/ Building Decarbonization and Gas Policy Branch: We are committed to building a diverse and inclusive team and strongly encourage applications from individuals of all backgrounds, identities, and abilities to join our team. Please visit Energy Division's recruitment page located here: Energy-Division-Recruiting for further job opportunities. Federal Workers, California Welcomes You! Please visit Federal Workers, California Welcomes You! for instructions on how to apply. Department Website: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov" That's about the department. Could be part of About the role. - Job Description And Duties paragraph: "Individuals interested in applying for this vacancy must have eligibility. If you are new to state service or need to gain eligibility to these classifications, please Click here or Click here to open the examination bulletin and follow the instructions on “How to apply”. For this classification, applicants with disabilities may gain eligibility through the Limited Examination and Appointment Program (LEAP), an alternative to the standard testing process. Click here or Click here to open the examination bulletin. Applicants may choose to apply through either the Standard or LEAP process. The examination is a separate process from applying for this vacancy. Please be sure to follow all instructions for each process. Virtual interviews via web portals or phone may be offered as deemed appropriate and feasible by the hiring manager – standard in-person interviews will still be offered if conditions permit. Do you want to gain in-depth knowledge of California's energy system? Decisions about the future of gas and building decarbonization are on the cutting edge of California energy policy. Under the direction of the Program and Project Supervisor, you will conduct analyzes and advise decisionmakers on topics that require you to balance the state's climate goals with gas and energy safety, reliability, and affordability. If you are a clear communicator and a pragmatic problem-solver who thrives in a team environment, the Building Decarbonization and Gas Policy Branch within the Energy Division could be a good place to take the next step on your career path. The Building Decarbonization and Gas Policy Branch includes the following sections: Natural Gas Policy and Reliability, Building Decarbonization, Gas and Oil Pipeline Costs and Rates, and Renewable Gas and Core Transport Agent Oversight. Applicants may be considered for positions in any of those sections. Your STD 678 (application form) will be used to determine your qualifications in order to meet the minimum qualification requirements for the advertised classification(s). Please clearly describe all of your experience related to public utilities and/or transportation in the areas of economics, finance, or policy in the job description field(s) of your STD 678 form, along with the years and months of service. Failure to do so may result in not qualifying for the minimum qualifications for the advertised classification(s). You will find additional information about the job in the Duty Statement ." That's a lot. We need to preserve all substantive info. We'll need to break into paragraphs and maybe lists for the sections of the branch. - Special Requirements: "Prepare and submit a response for each question below. The SOQ should provide specific details and examples that clearly demonstrate how your training, experience, and education qualifies you for the position. Refer to the job description and duties, and duty statement to prepare your response. Applicants who do not submit a completed SOQ and writing that exceeds the page limit will not be considered or scored. All information in the SOQ is subject to verification. The SOQ must be no smaller than 11-point Arial font, single-spaced, and no more than two pages. Please write your SOQ to address the following three questions: Describe your experience conducting technical, economic, financial, and/or policy research and analysis. Describe your experience writing reports, briefing documents, and/or legislative analyses. Describe your experience working on projects while maintaining cooperative working relationships with others. For helpful guidance on writing an effective SOQ, please see the Work4CA guide. It is strongly encouraged to apply through your CalCareer Account at www.jobs.ca.gov Electronic applications submitted through your CalCareer Account are highly recommended and will be received/processed faster than other methods of filing. If you are using education to meet the minimum qualifications for this position, you must submit a copy of your transcript or diploma. An official transcript will be required prior to appointment. Applicants who completed their education outside the United States (with foreign degrees/transcripts) must obtain and submit verification of United States course/degree equivalency by the application deadline. Foreign education credential evaluation services can be found at https://www.naces.org Employment information on the STD 678 state application MUST be complete with dates, duties and responsibilities, and contact names and phone numbers of supervisors. Resumes, or referring to resumes, will not be accepted in place of the completed STD 678. Applicants who fail to submit a completed STD 678 will not be considered. Only the most qualified candidates will be invited to an interview. Per CCR 249.3, this job control may be used to fill subsequent vacancies." That's a lot of application instructions, which we are supposed to remove: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we must remove application instructions. The Special Requirements section includes instructions for SOQ, which is part of the job posting's requirements (like what to submit). Is that considered application instructions? The instruction says remove application instructions. The SOQ is a requirement for the job (like a writing sample). It's not exactly "how to apply" but it's part of the application package. However, the instruction says remove application instructions. The SOQ details might be considered part of "Special Requirements" which is a legitimate section. But the instruction says to remove application instructions. The SOQ is not exactly "how to apply" but it's a required document. The posting includes many details about how to apply, formatting, etc. That seems like application instructions. The instruction says to remove application instructions. So we should probably omit the Special Requirements section entirely? But that would lose substantive info about what they want in SOQ (the three questions). However, the instruction says remove application instructions, not necessarily remove all requirement details. The SOQ is a requirement for the job (like a writing sample). It's not exactly "how to apply" but it's part of the application. The instruction says "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove the application instructions like "Please visit ... for instructions on how to apply", "Electronic applications submitted through your CalCareer Account are highly recommended", etc. The SOQ content (the three questions) might be considered part of the job's requirements (like what they want you to demonstrate). It's not exactly "how to apply". But the posting also includes details about formatting, font, page limit, etc. That is application instruction. The instruction says to remove application instructions, so we should strip out those formatting instructions. However, we need to preserve ALL substantive information. The substantive information includes the three questions they want you to answer. So we could keep the three questions as part of Requirements or Skills, but discard the formatting instructions (font size, page limit, etc.) and the "how to apply" bits. Thus we need to parse out the substantive content: the three questions: "Describe your experience conducting technical, economic, financial, and/or policy research and analysis. Describe your experience writing reports, briefing documents, and/or legislative analyses. Describe your experience working on projects while maintaining cooperative working relationships with others." Also maybe the statement