Jobs · Project Management

Project Manager III (Radiology)

Intelerad · United States · 2 wk ago
RemoteRemoteProject ManagementFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment only. Use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We have company description, job description, role overview, key responsibilities, qualifications (required and preferred), travel requirements, additional info (EEO etc). We need to remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Additional Information" EEO stuff. Travel requirements maybe part of schedule? Travel is not schedule but maybe we can include under a section? The instruction says use headings for those specific categories; we can include Travel under maybe "Schedule"? Not exactly. Travel is not schedule. Could we create a custom heading? The instruction says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It implies we should use those headings if applicable. It does not forbid other headings? It says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Likely they expect only those headings. So we need to map content to those sections. We have: - About the role: could be Role Overview paragraph. - Responsibilities: Key Responsibilities. - Requirements: maybe Required Qualifications & Experience. - Qualifications: maybe Preferred Qualifications & Special Requirements. - Skills: maybe list of skills (cloud architecture, networking, AWS, etc). Could be under Skills. - Benefits: none given (no benefits described). So omit Benefits. - Pay: none given. Omit. - Schedule: Travel requirements up to 25% travel; could be considered schedule? Might be considered schedule (travel). But schedule usually refers to work schedule (full-time, part-time, shift). Travel is not schedule. However we could include Travel under Schedule if we interpret as travel requirement. But instruction: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting states travel requirements, not schedule. So we should not create a Schedule section unless schedule is mentioned. It is not. So omit Schedule. Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Use
  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

    for prose. We need to avoid repeating job title as heading. Not include Job ID etc. We need to remove boilerplate: EEO statements, confidentiality, etc. Also remove "This job description is not a comprehensive list..." maybe that's boilerplate? It's a generic statement; could be considered boilerplate. Likely remove. Also "Additional Information" etc. We need to keep travel requirements? It's not under any of the allowed headings; maybe we could include under Responsibilities? Not appropriate. Could we create a separate section like "Travel"? Not allowed per instruction (they gave examples but didn't forbid others). However they said "Use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The e.g. suggests those are examples, not exclusive list. But later: "IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text ... and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." This implies we should not create sections for Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless present. It doesn't forbid other sections like Travel. However they gave examples of headings; maybe they expect us to stick to those. Safer to stick to those headings only. Travel info could be placed under Responsibilities? Not really. Could be under Requirements? Not really. Could be under Qualifications? Not really. Could be under Skills? Not really. Could be under About the role? Not really. Maybe we can incorporate travel into Responsibilities as a bullet: "Manage travel up to 25%..." but that's not a responsibility. Could be under Requirements as "Willingness to travel up to 25%". That seems plausible as a requirement. So we can add a bullet under Requirements: "Willingness to travel up to 25% primarily throughout North America". That preserves info. Now we need to extract content. Company Description: At Intelerad, we believe... This is company description; could be part of About the role? Actually About the role is about the role, not company. But we could include company description under About the role? Might be okay. However the instruction: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

    or drop it." So we can have a short paragraph about company under About the role? Might be okay. Better: About the role section could contain the Role Overview paragraph plus maybe company description as context. We'll include the Role Overview paragraph as prose. Responsibilities: list each bullet from Key Responsibilities. Requirements: Required Qualifications & Experience bullet list. Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications & Special Requirements bullet list. Skills: maybe list of skills: "Skills in cloud architecture and networking a major advantage, AWS preferred". Also maybe "Experience managing healthcare IT projects or working in healthcare provider environments strongly preferred" is more qualification than skill. But we can put cloud architecture, networking, AWS under Skills. We need to ensure we don't lose any substantive info. Let's parse the text. Company Description: "At Intelerad, we believe the path to answers in healthcare should be clear-whether you are waiting for a diagnosis or trying to expedite one. Our medical imaging solutions streamline the flow of information, simplifying complex processes, maximizing efficiencies, and shining a light on the unknown. We empower physicians to get patients the answers they need faster and improve outcomes for everyone. With more accessible imaging, we are getting patients out of the dark. Headquartered in Raleigh, NC and Montreal, Intelerad has nearly 800 employees located in offices across four countries. The company empowers nearly 2,000 healthcare organizations around the world with the speed, scalability, and simplicity needed to increase business performance while, most importantly, improving patient outcomes. Intelerad’s modern enterprise solutions have been acknowledged by a Best in KLAS recognition, ranking #1 for PACS Europe UK/Ireland in the 2026 Best in KLAS: Global Software (Non-US) report." Job Description Role Overview: "We are seeking an experienced Project Manager III to lead successful delivery of medium-to-large-scale healthcare IT implementations for radiology and cardiology imaging solutions. This role requires strong project management expertise combined with the ability to navigate complex customer environments, coordinate cross-functional teams, and ensure on-time, on-budget project completion. The ideal candidate brings proven experience managing multiple concurrent implementations, mentoring junior team members, and building trusted advisor relationships with healthcare provider clients. This position plays a critical role in ensuring customers realize the full value of Intelerad's medical imaging platforms throughout their implementation journey." Key Responsibilities (list): - Lead end-to-end project planning, execution, and delivery for medium to large-scale healthcare IT implementations, managing project scope, timeline, budget, and resource allocation to ensure successful outcomes that meet customer requirements and business objectives. - Serve as primary customer contact and trusted advisor throughout project lifecycle, proactively identifying and resolving issues, managing escalations cross-functionally, and maintaining transparent communication with internal and external stakeholders to ensure alignment and project success. - Coordinate Professional Services resources across implementation teams, create and maintain comprehensive project documentation including plans, status reports, and meeting minutes, and ensure all deliverables meet quality standards and established timelines. - Mentor Project Manager I and II team members, providing guidance on best practices, escalation management, and customer relationship development to build team capability and ensure consistent delivery excellence across the PMO organization. - Lead internal transformation and standardization initiatives under PMO leadership direction, contributing to continuous improvement programs that enhance delivery methodology, tools, and team performance across Professional Services. Qualifications Required Qualifications & Experience: - Bachelor's degree or equivalent experience - 5+ years of experience in project management roles, with demonstrated success leading medium to largescale technology implementations - Proven ability to manage multiple concurrent projects, prioritize competing demands, and deliver results within timeline and budget constraints Preferred Qualifications & Special Requirements: - Experience managing healthcare IT projects or working in healthcare provider environments strongly preferred - Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt or Green Belt certification - Experience with radiology or cardiology healthcare IT solutions such as PACS, RIS, or enterprise imaging platforms - CAPM or PMP certification - Experience managing projects in North American healthcare setting - Skills in cloud architecture and networking a major advantage, AWS preferred Travel Requirements: "This position requires up to 25% travel, primarily throughout North America" Additional Information (EEO etc) to be removed. Now we need to produce HTML. We'll have:

    About the role

    Company description paragraph(s) + Role Overview paragraph.

    We could combine company description and role overview into one

    or two

    ? The instruction: use

    for prose. Could have multiple

    elements. We'll keep them separate for clarity. But we need to avoid duplication. Company description is separate from role overview; both are prose. We'll output two

    under About the role. Then Responsibilities:

    Responsibilities

    • ... each bullet
    Requirements:

    Requirements

    • ... required qualifications
    Qualifications:

    Qualifications

    • ... preferred qualifications
    Skills:

    Skills

    • ... skills in cloud architecture and networking a major advantage, AWS preferred
    We might also include "Experience managing healthcare IT projects or working in healthcare provider environments strongly preferred" under Qualifications (already there). Good. Now ensure we didn't miss any substantive info: The company description includes headquarters, employee count, empowerment numbers, Best in KLAS recognition. All included. Role overview includes all details. Responsibilities includes all five bullets. Requirements includes three bullets. Qualifications includes six bullets (including experience managing healthcare IT projects, Lean Six Sigma, experience with radiology/cardiology solutions, CAPM/PMP, experience managing projects in North American healthcare setting, Skills in cloud architecture and networking a major advantage, AWS preferred). Wait the last bullet is actually under Skills but we placed it under Skills. However the original text lists it as part of Preferred Qualifications & Special Requirements: "Skills in cloud architecture and networking a major advantage, AWS preferred". So we could keep it under Qualifications as a bullet, but we also have a separate Skills section. To avoid duplication, we should not duplicate. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we split it, we need to ensure it's still present somewhere. We could keep it under Qualifications and not have a separate Skills section. But then we would have no Skills section. However we might still want a Skills section for other skills; but there are none else. So we could omit Skills section and keep that bullet under Qualifications. That would preserve info. The instruction says we can include a Skills section if posting has real specific content for it. The posting does mention skills (cloud architecture, networking, AWS). So we could have a Skills section with that bullet. But then we need to ensure we don't lose it elsewhere. If we move it to Skills, we should remove it from Qualifications to avoid duplication. However the bullet is originally under Preferred Qualifications & Special Requirements; moving it to Skills might be considered a reinterpretation but still preserves the info. It's not inventing or summarizing away detail; it's just re-categorizing. I think it's acceptable. However to be safe, we could keep it under Qualifications and not create

Similar jobs