Project Manager - Construction & Commissioning

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting is in German, but we need to extract content. We need to remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Additional Information" maybe? But we need to keep substantive info: job description summary, roles and responsibilities, basic qualifications, desired attributes, additional information about benefits, pay, etc. We need to format as semantic HTML: use

for section headings. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. We must not repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. We need to preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. Important: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. We have pay info: "For candidates applying to a U.S. based position, the pay range for this position is between $100,000.00 and $166,700.00. The Company pays a geographic differential of 110%, 120% or 130% of salary in certain areas. The specific pay offered may be influenced by a variety of factors, including the candidate’s experience, education, and skill set. Bonus eligibility: discretionary annual bonus." Thus we can have a Pay section with that content. Benefits: "Available benefits include medical, dental, vision, and prescription drug coverage; access to Health Coach from GE Vernova, a 24/7 nurse-based resource; and access to the Employee Assistance Program, providing 24/7 confidential assessment, counseling and referral services. Retirement benefits include the GE Vernova Retirement Savings Plan, a tax-advantaged 401(k) savings opportunity with company matching contributions and company retirement contributions, as well as access to Fidelity resources and financial planning consultants. Other benefits include tuition assistance, adoption assistance, paid parental leave, disability benefits, life insurance, 12 paid holidays, and permissive time off." Thus Benefits section. Schedule: Not mentioned. So we should NOT include Schedule section. About the role: The "Job Description Summary" and maybe "Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten" etc. We need to decide sections: maybe "About the role" (summary), "Responsibilities" (roles and responsibilities), "Requirements" (basic qualifications?), "Qualifications" (desired attributes?), "Skills" maybe combine? But we must not create thin sections. We need to decide based on content. We have: - Job Description Summary (German): "Verantwortlich für Tätigkeiten im Zusammenhang mit dem Bau, der Errichtung und Inbetriebnahme beim Kunden, von der Mobilisierung des Standorts über Bau-, Montage- und Inbetriebnahmearbeiten bis hin zu Managementaktivitäten in diesem Bereich. Verantwortlich für die Planung/Ausführung des Abteilungsbetriebs oder konzentriert sich auf die Ausführung von beruflichen Tätigkeiten innerhalb einer technischen Disziplin.Hat eine gewisse Autonomie, wird jedoch von festgelegten Richtlinien oder der Überprüfung der Endergebnisse geleitet. Die Stelle ermöglicht die Änderung von Arbeitsabläufen und Praktiken, sofern die Endergebnisse den Standards der Akzeptanz (Qualität, Umfang, Aktualität usw.) entsprechen." That's a prose description. - "Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten" (Roles and Responsibilities) long paragraph with many sentences describing role. - "Grundqualifikationen" (Basic Qualifications): "Diese Rolle erfordert fortgeschrittene Erfahrung. Der Wissensstand ist vergleichbar mit einem Bachelor-Abschluss einer akkreditierten Universität oder Hochschule (oder einem Abitur mit relevanter Erfahrung)." - "Gewünschte Eigenschaften" (Desired Attributes): list of bullet-like sentences: "Sehr gute mündliche und schriftliche Kommunikationsfähigkeiten. Ausgeprägte Sozialkompetenz und Führungsqualitäten. Fähigkeit, andere zu beeinflussen und kleine Teams zu führen. Initiativen von mittlerem Umfang und mittlerer Wirkung leiten. Fähigkeit, mehrere Projekte gleichzeitig zu koordinieren. Effektive Erkennung und Lösung von Problemen. Nachweisliche analytische und organisatorische Fähigkeiten." - Additional note about US immigration: "Hinweis:Um die Einwanderungsbestimmungen der USA und andere gesetzliche Anforderungen zu erfüllen, muss die Mindestanzahl der Jahre an Erfahrung angegeben werden, die für eine Tätigkeit in den USA erforderlich sind.Für Rollen außerhalb der USA sollten sich die JDs auf das für die Rolle erforderliche inhaltliche Erfahrungsniveau konzentrieren, um die Einhaltung der geltenden Rechtsvorschriften zu gewährleisten, und eine Mindestanzahl von Jahren sollte NICHT verwendet werden." That's a note but maybe we can include as part of Requirements? It's about experience years. Might be considered metadata but it's substantive. We'll keep as a paragraph. - Disclaimer: "Diese Stellenbeschreibung soll einen allgemeinen Leitfaden für die Rolle liefern.Sie soll jedoch nicht die von jedem Mitarbeiter gemäß dem jeweiligen Arbeitsvertrag und/oder gemäß einer anderweitigen Vereinbarung zwischen einem Mitarbeiter und seinem Vorgesetzten geforderten Pflichten ändern oder anderweitig einzuschränken/erweitern." That's boilerplate legal; we should remove as it's legal boilerplate. - Additional Information section includes GE Vernova offers..., EEO, etc. We need to remove EEO/equal-opportunity boilerplate, but we can keep the substantive benefits and pay info. The "Additional Information" includes many lines: "GE Vernova offers a great work environment, professional development, challenging careers, and competitive compensation." That's substantive but somewhat generic; we could keep as part of Benefits? But it's more about work environment. Might be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO but it's a generic statement. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. This line is not exactly those categories, but it's somewhat generic fluff. However we might keep it as part of "About the role" or a separate "Overview"? But we need to avoid thin sections. Perhaps we can incorporate it into a short paragraph under "About the role". However we must preserve ALL substantive information; we cannot invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep that sentence somewhere. But we also have the EEO paragraph: "GE Vernova is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Employment decisions are made without regard to race, color, religion, national or ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, protected veteran status or other characteristics protected by law." That's EEO boilerplate; we must remove. Also: "GE Vernova will only employ those who are legally authorized to work in the United States for this opening. Any offer of employment is conditioned upon the successful completion of a drug screen (as applicable)." That's legal/requirement; maybe we keep as part of Requirements? It's about eligibility. It's substantive but maybe considered legal. The instruction says remove legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is legal requirement about work authorization and drug screen. Might be considered legal boilerplate. However it's a specific condition for employment; maybe we keep? The instruction says remove legal boilerplate. I'd interpret that as standard EEO statements, not necessarily work authorization. But to be safe, we could keep it as a short note under Requirements. Also: "Relocation Assistance Provided: No" That's minor metadata; we can fold into a short p or drop. Probably drop as it's not substantive. Also: "This posting is expected to remain open for at least seven days after it was posted on September 22, 2026." That's application instruction/boilerplate; we should remove. Also: "GE Vernova Inc. or its affiliates (collectively or individually, “GE Vernova”) sponsor certain employee benefit plans or programs GE Vernova reserves the right to terminate, amend, suspend, replace, or modify its benefit plans and programs at any time and for any reason, in its sole discretion. No individual has a vested right to any benefit under a GE Vernova welfare benefit plan or program. This document does not create a contract of employment with any individual." That's legal boilerplate about benefits; we should remove. Thus we need to extract substantive content: - Job Description Summary (prose) - Roles and Responsibilities (long prose) - Basic Qualifications (prose) - Desired Attributes (list of items) - Note about US immigration experience years (maybe as a note) - GE Vernova offers a great work environment, professional development, challenging careers, and competitive compensation. (maybe as part of About the role or a separate "Overview") - Pay range and bonus eligibility. - Benefits details. We need to decide sections. Potential sections: - About the role: could combine Job Description Summary + GE Vernova offers... maybe. - Responsibilities: the "Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten" content. - Requirements: Basic Qualifications + US immigration note + work authorization/drug screen? Might be too much but okay. - Qualifications: Desired Attributes. - Skills: maybe not needed; we could incorporate desired attributes into Qualifications. - Benefits: the benefits paragraph. - Pay: pay range and bonus. We should not create Schedule. We need to use

  for each section heading. We need to use

  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. For prose, use

    . Thus for sections that have list-like content (e.g., Desired Attributes, Benefits items, maybe Responsibilities if we can break into bullet points). However the Responsibilities is a long paragraph with many sentences; we could keep as

    or break into

    • if we treat each sentence as a duty. The instruction: "Use
      • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". So if we have a list of duties, we should use list. The Responsibilities section contains many duties; we could split into list items. Similarly, Desired Attributes is a list of attributes; we could use list. Benefits also list. We need to preserve ALL substantive information; we cannot invent or summarize away detail. So we need to ensure we don't lose any detail by splitting into list items; we can keep each sentence as a list item. Thus we need to parse the German text into sentences. Let's extract each piece. Job Description Summary (summary): "Verantwortlich für Tätigkeiten im Zusammenhang mit dem Bau, der Errichtung und Inbetriebnahme beim Kunden, von der Mobilisierung des Standorts über Bau-, Montage- und Inbetriebnahmearbeiten bis hin zu Managementaktivitäten in diesem Bereich. Verantwortlich für die Planung/Ausführung des Abteilungsbetriebs oder konzentriert sich auf die Ausführung von beruflichen Tätigkeiten innerhalb einer technischen Disziplin.Hat eine gewisse Autonomie, wird jedoch von festgelegten Richtlinien oder der Überprüfung der Endergebnisse geleitet. Die Stelle ermöglicht die Änderung von Arbeitsabläufen und Praktiken, sofern die Endergebnisse den Standards der Akzeptanz (Qualität, Umfang, Aktualität usw.) entsprechen." Note there is a missing space after "Disziplin.Hat". We'll keep as is. We can split into sentences: 1. Verantwortlich für Tätigkeiten im Zusammenhang mit dem Bau, der Errichtung und Inbetriebnahme beim