Police Officer Recruit (General) (Bilingual)

We need to extract substantive content: The posting includes "Who We Are", "What We Offer", "General Definition", "About the Orientation Process & Evaluation of Fitness for Duty", "Additional Salary Information", "Contact Information", "Notes to Applicants and Projected Exam Information" (including many details about indebtedness, residency waiver, preference points, etc). Also "Requirements" section appears truncated: "Requirements Only those competitors who have a passing gra". Likely incomplete; but we need to preserve all substantive information. The truncated part may be incomplete; we should include what is there? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If it's truncated, we include as is? Probably we include the text up to that point. We need to output HTML fragment with headings

for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. However we should only include sections when posting has real specific content. The posting has sections like "Who We Are", "What We Offer", "General Definition", "About the Orientation Process & Evaluation of Fitness for Duty", "Additional Salary Information", "Contact Information", "Notes to Applicants and Projected Exam Information". These don't map exactly to the prescribed headings, but we must use those headings only. The instruction: "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It suggests we should use those headings if appropriate. But we must only include a section when the posting has real, specific content for it. So we need to map content to those headings if possible. For example, "Who We Are" could be "About the role"? Not exactly. "What We Offer" could be Benefits. "General Definition" could be About the role? "About the Orientation Process & Evaluation of Fitness for Duty" could be Responsibilities? Not really. "Additional Salary Information" is Pay. "Contact Information" maybe not a standard heading; we could drop as not in list? The instruction says we should not put Job ID etc as headings; but contact info maybe not required heading; we could embed in a

under appropriate section? Probably better to keep as a

without heading? But they said use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use those for section headings. Likely we should only use those headings; other headings like "Who We Are" should be turned into

or omitted? The instruction: "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It implies we should use those headings for sections; but we could also have other headings? It says use

for section headings (e.g ...). It doesn't say we cannot use other headings, but likely they want us to map to those standard headings. However the content includes many sections not matching those; maybe we should treat them as

under appropriate headings, or we could create sections with those headings if they have content. Eg "Who We Are" could be placed under "About the role". "What We Offer" could be Benefits. "General Definition" could be About the role as well. "About the Orientation Process & Evaluation of Fitness for Duty" could be Responsibilities? Actually orientation process is part of hiring process, not responsibilities. Could be "Requirements"? Not exactly. "Additional Salary Information" is Pay. "Contact Information" maybe we can drop or put as

without heading. "Notes to Applicants and Projected Exam Information" includes many details like indebtedness, residency waiver, preference points, etc. That could be under "Requirements" or "Qualifications". Might be better to create a section "Requirements" and put that content there. We need to decide. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we should combine related content into fewer sections. Thus we could have: - About the role: combine "Who We Are", "What We Offer", "General Definition". Provide description of the job, mission, etc. - Responsibilities: maybe orientation process? Actually orientation process is about hiring, not job duties. Could be "Responsibilities" for the role: The general definition includes protection of life and property, enforcement of laws, investigation of crimes, training at academy, on-the-job experience, etc. That seems like responsibilities. So we can put that under Responsibilities. - Requirements: include the notes about indebtedness, residency waiver, preference points, etc. Also maybe the eligibility criteria (like passing tests, etc). Also the "Requirements" truncated text. - Qualifications: maybe education/degree points? Actually the preference points for education etc could be qualifications. But we could also put under Qualifications. - Skills: maybe language fluency, etc. - Benefits: from "What We Offer" includes benefits, health care, etc. Also Public Service Loan Forgiveness. - Pay: from Additional Salary Information: $72,651 after academy. - Schedule: not provided; we should not create Schedule section if no content. Thus we will output sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay. Ensure each has substantive content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Not include Job ID etc. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. The posting includes many EEO statements, accommodation process, etc. Those are legal/EEO boilerplate; we should remove them. Also the "Equal Access to Civil Service Testing" etc is EEO/accommodation; remove. Also the "Only an on-line application will be accepted..." is application instruction; remove. Also contact information maybe not boilerplate but could be kept? It's not EEO; it's contact info for HR; maybe keep as part of Notes? But contact info may be considered not boilerplate; but it's not a standard heading; we could embed in a

under appropriate section (maybe Requirements). However the instruction says "do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it." Contact info is not minor metadata; it's contact info. Could be kept as a

without heading? But we need to use headings for sections; we could have a section "Contact Information" but not in list; maybe we should drop it as not required. Safer to drop contact info. Thus we will produce HTML with sections:

About the role

... combine Who We Are, What We Offer, General Definition ...

Responsibilities

... General Definition details about protection, enforcement, investigation, training, etc ...

Requirements

• ... indebtedness notice ...
• ... residency waiver ...
• ... preference points details (veteran, legacy, national volunteer service, language fluency, other additional points) ...
• ... requirements about passing tests, orientation, etc ...

But we need to preserve all substantive information; we should not lose details. So we need to include the specific points: indebtedness notice details, residency waiver, preference points for veterans (10 points), legacy (10 points), national volunteer service (up to 5 points), language fluency (3 points), other additional points (explorers cadet program 3 points, education points). Also the note about only those who pass exam get additional credits. Also the note about eligible list duration (1-2 years). Also the note about open-competitive list, no promotional preference. Also the note about type of eligible list: open-competitive. Also the note about indebtedness notice details. Also the note about residency waiver: establishment of residency required within 18 months after appointment. Also the note about preference points claim period: from time of application until 30 days after eligible list established. Also the note about documentation required. Also the note about veteran's preference: honorably discharged, DD214 etc. Also legacy preference: children/grandchildren of fallen firefighters/police officers. Also national volunteer service details: Peace Corps, AmeriCorps NCCC (including FEMA Corps), AmeriCorps VISTA; points based on hours. Also language fluency interview requirement. Also other additional points: Philadelphia Police Explorers Cadet Program (3 points for 2 years service, 672 hours training + 298 hours community service). Education points: Associate's degree or 60 credits = 1 point; Bachelor's = 2 points; Master's = 3 points. Also the note: "Only those competitors who have a passing grade in an examination shall receive additional credits to which they may be entitled." Also the note about "Other Additional Points" heading. Also the note about "Requirements Only those competitors who have a passing gra" truncated; we should include that as is? Probably include the text up to that point. Also the note about "Additional Salary Information After successful completion of the Philadelphia Police Academy, the salary increases to $72,651." So Pay section. Also the note about "Who We Are As an employer, the City of Philadelphia values inclusion, integrity, innovation, empowerment, and hard work above all else. We offer a vibrant work environment, comprehensive health care and benefits, and the experience you need to grow and excel. If you’re interested in working with a passionate team of people who care about the future of Philadelphia, start here." That's about the employer. Also "What We Offer Impact - The work you do here matters to millions. Growth - Philadelphia is growing, why not grow with it? Diversity & Inclusion - Find a career in a place where everyone belongs. Benefits - We Care About Your Well-being. The City of Philadelphia is a Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program qualified employer. Learn more here: https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public-service". So Benefits section includes impact, growth, diversity & inclusion, benefits, PSLF. Also "General Definition This is training level work in general duty police activities involving the protection of life and property, enforcement of laws, and the investigation of crimes. An employee in this class receives formal training at the Police Academy and on-the-job experience preparatory to assuming full patrol duties. Work is performed under the supervision of a police supervisor and requires regular exposure to uncontrolled and/or unpredictable conditions. The work requires frequent exercise of moderate physical effort." That's responsibilities. Thus we can structure: About the role: combine Who We Are and What We Offer (impact, growth, diversity & inclusion, benefits, PSLF). Could also include General Definition? But General Definition is more about duties; maybe better under Responsibilities. Thus:

About the role

As an employer, the City of Philadelphia values inclusion, integrity, innovation, empowerment, and hard work above all else. We offer a vibrant work environment, comprehensive health care and benefits, and the experience you need to grow and excel. If you’re interested in working with a passionate team of people who care about the future of Philadelphia, start here.

Impact - The work you do here matters to millions. Growth - Philadelphia is growing, why not grow with it? Diversity & Inclusion - Find a career in a place where everyone belongs. Benefits - We Care About Your Well-being. The City of Philadelphia is a Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program qualified employer. Learn more here: https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public-service

But we should not add unless original had URL; we can keep as plain text with URL. Res