OPSEC Technical Risk Analyst

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "OWN YOUR OPPORTUNITY" maybe not needed? It's promotional but maybe considered boilerplate? It's not required to keep. Probably remove. We need to extract content: The job description includes: - Clearance Level Must Currently Possess: Top Secret/SCI Clearance Level Must Be Able To Obtain: Top Secret SCI + Polygraph Public Trust/Other Required: None - Job Family: Cyber and IT Risk Management - Skills: (list?) Actually "Skills:" line then "Job Qualifications: Counterintelligence Analysis, Intelligence Analysis, Threat Analysis Certifications: None Experience: 5 + years of related experience US Citizenship Required: Yes" But then later there is "Job Description: OPSEC Technical Risk Analyst" and description paragraphs. Then "PERFOMANCE" (typo) list of duties. Then "Other Requirements" list. Then "Experience 8+ years related experience SAP experience required Education Bachelor’s degree in a related area OR associate’s degree in a related area + 2 years’ experience OR equivalent experience (4 years) Security Clearance TS/SCI Must be able to obtain TS/SCI with CI poly" Then "OWN YOUR OPPORTUNITY ..." (maybe ignore) Then "The likely salary range for this position is $118,405 - $160,195. This is not, however, a guarantee of compensation or salary. Rather, salary will be set based on experience, geographic location and possibly contractual requirements and could fall outside of this range." Then "Scheduled Weekly Hours: 40 Travel Required: 10-25% Telecommuting Options: Onsite Work Location: USA OH Dayton Additional Work Locations:" Then "Total Rewards At GDIT: Our benefits package for all US-based employees includes a variety of medical plan options, some with Health Savings Accounts, dental plan options, a vision plan, and a 401(k) plan offering the ability to contribute both pre and post-tax dollars up to the IRS annual limits and receive a company match. To encourage work/life balance, GDIT offers employees full flex work weeks where possible and a variety of paid time off plans, including vacation, sick and personal time, holidays, paid parental, military, bereavement and jury duty leave. To ensure our employees are able to protect their income, other offerings such as short and long-term disability benefits, life, accidental death and dismemberment, personal accident, critical illness and business travel and accident insurance are provided or available. We regularly review our Total Rewards package to ensure our offerings are competitive and reflect what our employees have told us they value most." Then "Our Identity Verification Process: ..." (maybe boilerplate? It's about identity verification, could be considered part of hiring process but maybe not required; but it's not EEO etc. Might keep? It's not about benefits/pay/schedule. Could be considered boilerplate but it's specific to hiring process. The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. Identity verification is not exactly those, but could be considered legal? Might be safe to keep? However it's not about job duties/requirements/benefits/pay/schedule. It's more about hiring process. The instruction says remove application instructions. Identity verification process is part of hiring process, maybe considered application instructions. Safer to remove. Then "About Our Work: ..." (company description) maybe boilerplate? Could be considered not needed. Might remove. We need to decide sections: About the role (maybe a summary paragraph), Responsibilities (list of duties), Requirements (clearance, citizenship, experience, education, etc.), Qualifications (maybe skills?), Skills (list of specific skills), Benefits (from Total Rewards), Pay (salary range), Schedule (weekly hours, travel, telecommuting). Must not create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". We have actual content. We must not repeat job title as heading. So no

OPSEC Technical Risk Analyst

. Use headings for sections. We need to preserve all substantive information. Let's extract. First, About the role: Could be the paragraph after "Job Description: OPSEC Technical Risk Analyst The OPSEC Technical Risk Analyst serves as a key member..." That's a description. We'll put that in

under

About the role

. Responsibilities: The list under "PERFOMANCE" (typo) includes bullet-like sentences separated by periods. We'll convert to

• each duty. Other Requirements list: after "Other Requirements" we have a paragraph with multiple sentences each starting with a capability. We'll split into list items. Skills: The "Skills:" line then "Job Qualifications: Counterintelligence Analysis, Intelligence Analysis, Threat Analysis Certifications: None Experience: 5 + years of related experience US Citizenship Required: Yes". This is confusing. Actually "Skills:" then "Job Qualifications:" maybe they meant skills list. We'll treat the items after "Skills:" as skills: Counterintelligence Analysis, Intelligence Analysis, Threat Analysis. Certifications: None (maybe not needed). Experience: 5+ years of related experience (but later they say Experience 8+ years related experience). There's conflicting experience: earlier says 5+ years, later says 8+ years related experience SAP experience required. We need to preserve both? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include both statements. Might combine? But we should not summarize away detail; we could list both as separate items under Requirements or Experience. However we must not create filler. We'll include both as separate bullet points under Requirements maybe. Education: Bachelor’s degree in a related area OR associate’s degree in a related area + 2 years’ experience OR equivalent experience (4 years). We'll include. Security Clearance: TS/SCI Must be able to obtain TS/SCI with CI poly. US Citizenship Required: Yes. SAP experience required. Now Benefits: from Total Rewards paragraph. Pay: salary range $118,405 - $160,195. Schedule: Scheduled Weekly Hours: 40 Travel Required: 10-25% Telecommuting Options: Onsite Work Location: USA OH Dayton Additional Work Locations: (maybe blank). We'll include weekly hours, travel, telecommuting options, work location. We must not create sections if content is placeholder. We have actual content for each. Now produce HTML. Structure:

  About the role

  ...

  Responsibilities

  • ...
  ...

  Requirements

  • Top Secret/SCI clearance currently required; must be able to obtain TS/SCI with CI polygraph.
  • U.S. citizenship required.
  • 5+ years of related experience (also noted 8+ years related experience with SAP experience required).
  • Bachelor’s degree in a related area OR associate’s degree in a related area + 2 years’ experience OR equivalent experience (4 years).
  • SAP experience required.
  But we also have Skills section. Could separate Skills.

  Skills

  • Counterintelligence Analysis
  • Intelligence Analysis
  • Threat Analysis
  • Information operations and Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) analysis, with emphasis on communications networks, radio frequency phenomenology, and signals characterization/analysis.
  • Familiarity with Intelligence Community and standard DoD intelligence information systems.
  • Knowledge of DoD acquisition processes, including Program Protection / Technology Protection concepts.
  • Well-versed in applicable DoD, National and agency security policies, directives, manuals, standards, and instructions.
  • Experience with space modeling and simulation software (e.g., Satellite Tool Kit (STK) or Satellite Orbit Analysis Program (SOAP)).
  • Working familiarity with multi-INT collection disciplines – SIGINT, IMINT, ELINT, RADINT, and optical sensing.
  But some of these are from Other Requirements. Might be better to put Other Requirements under Requirements or Skills. However we have a separate "Other Requirements" list that includes many items: analyzing space systems, OPSEC considerations, intelligence support to force modernization, etc. We could incorporate those into Requirements or Skills. To avoid duplication, we need to decide. We have "Other Requirements" paragraph after performance list. Let's extract that: "Other Requirements Demonstrated experience analyzing space systems, operational security considerations, and providing intelligence support to force modernization programs and capability development efforts.Working knowledge and applied experience in information operations and Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) analysis, with specific emphasis on communications networks, radio frequency phenomenology, and signals characterization/analysis.Familiarity with the Intelligence Community and standard DoD intelligence information systems, and the ability to operate effectively within those environments.Knowledge of DoD acquisition processes, including Program Protection / Technology Protection concepts and risk considerations associated with advanced capabilities.Must be well-versed in applicable DoD, National and agency security policies, directives, manuals, standards, and instructions, and able to apply them properly to sensitive programs and mission sets.Possess experience and familiarity with space modeling and simulation software. This includes proficiency with tools such as the Satellite Tool Kit (STK) or the Satellite Orbit Analysis Program (SOAP).Working familiarity with multi-INT collection disciplines – including SIGINT, IMINT, ELINT, RADINT, and optical sensing, sufficient to understand collection methodologies, sensor capabilities and limitations, exploitation workflows, reporting outputs, and how each discipline can be applied to characterize systems, assess threats, and inform technical risk decisions." We can treat these as Skills or Requirements. Since they are requirements, maybe put under Requirements. But we already have a Requirements section for clearance, citizenship, experience, education, SAP. We could expand Requirements to include these. However the instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe combine all requirements into one Requirements section, and have Skills separate for the specific skill areas like Counterintelligence Analysis, Intelligence Analysis, Threat Analysis. But the Other Requirements includes many skill-like items. Could treat them as Skills. Let's decide: We'll have: - About the role (description) - Responsibilities (performance duties) - Requirements (clearance, citizenship, experience, education, SAP) - Skills (Counterintelligence Analysis, Intelligence Analysis, Threat Analysis, plus the other technical skills from Other Requirements) - Benefits (Total Rewards) - Pay (salary range) - Schedule (weekly hours, travel, telecommuting, work location) We must not create sections with filler. All have content. Now we need to ensure we don't duplicate content. We'll extract each piece exactly. Let's draft About the role paragraph: "The OPSEC Technical Risk Analyst serves as a key member of an integrated mission-support team responsible for delivering timely, actionable intelligence, counterintelligence, and technical analysis. The primary objective of this role is to enable well-informed risk management decisions by identifying, assessing, and communicating relevant threat activity, adversary capabilities, and system vulnerabilities. In addition, the analyst provides technical and non-technical mitigation strategies to reduce mission risk across a range of sensitive programs." That's from the description. Now Responsibilities: list each sentence from "PERFOMANCE" block. Let's extract sentences: - Authoring and producing detailed intelligence assessments including Technical Assessments, executive summaries, detailed analytic reports, presentations, and other tailored deliverables intended to inform senior level decision-makers and mission stakeholders. - Accessing and conducting research