Nuclear Engineer

We need to output only HTML fragment, no markdown fences. Use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Include only sections with real content. The posting includes: Salary: $75 - $100 per hour (Pay). Benefits: "Competitive Hourly Compensation: Up to $100 per hour as an independent contractor Paid Onboarding: You are paid for the onboarding program, not only for project work No Interview Process: Candidates we put forward go directly into paid onboarding Keep Your Current Role: Structured as supplemental work. No requirement to leave your position 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones Direct Impact on Nuclear Safeguards: Your judgment determines where these models draw the line on nuclear and radiological questions Work Inside Your Expertise: Technical review and reference writing in your own discipline, not general purpose data work Growing Engagement: An expanding program with continued need across all four CBRN domains". That's benefits. Also schedule: "100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones". Could be schedule. Also maybe "About the role" from description: "We are partnered with a fast growing AI data services company...". That's about the role. Responsibilities: list under "Key Responsibilities and Duties". Requirements: maybe "Qualifications Needed". Also "Qualifications" maybe separate. Skills: maybe "Professional English proficiency at C1 minimum..." etc. We'll need to parse. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate like EEO, legal, application instructions, etc. Also remove duplicated lines like "Want to learn more about this role and Jobot Consulting? Click our Jobot Consulting logo and follow our LinkedIn page!" repeated. Also remove "Interested in hearing more? Easy Apply now by clicking the "Easy Apply" button." etc. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include details about responsibilities, qualifications, benefits, pay, schedule, about the role, maybe skills. Let's extract sections: About the role: The paragraph starting "We are partnered with a fast growing AI data services company..." up to "We are helping them identify nuclear engineering specialists for this engagement." That's about the role. Responsibilities: bullet list under "Key Responsibilities and Duties". We'll need to convert each sentence into

. Let's list them: - Review AI generated responses covering nuclear and radiological topics, including fuel cycle, criticality, reactor systems, special nuclear material, safeguards, shielding and emergency response, for technical accuracy, safety framing and guideline alignment - Flag outputs that provide dangerous procedural detail, material acquisition or diversion guidance, weaponization support, safeguards or detection evasion, or other misuse enabling content - Create gold standard reference content that answers benign nuclear questions responsibly without introducing operationally sensitive detail - Evaluate and rank model outputs on safe handling, correct risk framing, appropriate refusals, helpful redirection, scientific accuracy and clarity - Detect hallucinated claims, incorrect physics, wrong units or activity figures, misleading risk statements, overconfident conclusions and unsafe recommendations - Apply project rubrics consistently and provide clear written feedback explaining why content is safe, unsafe, incomplete or technically incorrect - Ensure content uses precise nuclear terminology and communicates risk without exaggeration or minimization - Escalate ambiguous, high risk or potentially harmful content for additional review per project guidelines - Contribute across adjacent chemical, biological and radiological content where your background supports it Requirements: maybe "Qualifications Needed" includes education and experience. Let's list: - Bachelor's degree or higher in Nuclear Engineering, Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Health Physics, Radiation Science or a related field, or equivalent professional experience - Minimum 3 years of professional experience in nuclear engineering, nuclear safety, criticality safety, reactor operations, fuel cycle, safeguards, decommissioning or technical review - Experience or strong background in nuclear safety basis, criticality safety, radiological risk assessment, shielding, material control and accountability, or reactor systems - Strong background in identifying unsafe instructions, operationally enabling detail, inappropriate specificity, misleading technical claims and unsupported conclusions - Proven ability to evaluate technical content for accuracy, completeness and policy alignment, and to explain that judgment in precise written English - Professional English proficiency at C1 minimum, sufficient to follow written guidelines and produce detailed written feedback - Familiarity with 10 CFR 830, 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, NQA-1, DOE nuclear safety orders, NRC licensing, or IAEA safeguards concepts preferred - Professional Engineer licensure, reactor operator licensure, or an active or recent DOE or DoD clearance preferred - Prior experience with AI safety, data annotation, technical QA, policy review, risk assessment, red team review, scientific review or rubric based evaluation strongly preferred - Reliable and self directed, able to deliver consistent quality in an hourly remote contractor workflow - Must be a citizen of the United States, United Kingdom, Australia or New Zealand Skills: maybe we can extract "Professional English proficiency at C1 minimum..." but that's already in qualifications. Could separate skills: "Professional English proficiency at C1 minimum", "Familiarity with ...", "Professional Engineer licensure..." etc. But we might combine qualifications and skills. However instruction: Use sections only when posting has real specific content. We can have Qualifications and Skills separate if content distinct. Let's treat Qualifications as education/experience, Skills as technical abilities like English proficiency, familiarity with regulations, licensure, prior experience, reliability, citizenship. Benefits: list from "Why join us? Why Join Us?" Actually there is duplicated heading "Why Join Us?" but content includes: - Competitive Hourly Compensation: Up to $100 per hour as an independent contractor - Paid Onboarding: You are paid for the onboarding program, not only for project work - No Interview Process: Candidates we put forward go directly into paid onboarding - Keep Your Current Role: Structured as supplemental work. No requirement to leave your position - 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones - Direct Impact on Nuclear Safeguards: Your judgment determines where these models draw the line on nuclear and radiological questions - Work Inside Your Expertise: Technical review and reference writing in your own discipline, not general purpose data work - Growing Engagement: An expanding program with continued need across all four CBRN domains Pay: Salary: $75 - $100 per hour (maybe also mention up to $100 per hour). We'll include Pay section with that. Schedule: Could be covered under benefits (flexible hours). But we can also create Schedule section: "100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones". Since it's also in benefits, but we can still include schedule separate if we want. However instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Might combine schedule into Benefits. But we need to include Pay section because posting states salary. Benefits section we have. Schedule maybe not needed separate if covered in Benefits. But we could still include Schedule as separate if we want, but risk being thin. I'd include Schedule as part of Benefits, not separate. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Skills, Benefits, Pay. We must not include empty sections. Ensure each heading has content. Now produce HTML fragment:

About the role

We are partnered with a fast growing AI data services company that builds the training and evaluation data behind many of the world's leading AI labs and foundation model developers. Their work sits where technical expertise meets model safety, bringing in specialists from nuclear engineering, radiation science, chemistry, biology and emergency response to evaluate how AI systems handle high consequence subject matter. The experts on these projects determine where these models should answer, where they should decline, and how they should reason about nuclear and radiological risk. They operate remotely across time zones and build their review teams around people who are already practicing in their field. We are helping them identify nuclear engineering specialists for this engagement.

Responsibilities

• Review AI generated responses covering nuclear and radiological topics, including fuel cycle, criticality, reactor systems, special nuclear material, safeguards, shielding and emergency response, for technical accuracy, safety framing and guideline alignment
• Flag outputs that provide dangerous procedural detail, material acquisition or diversion guidance, weaponization support, safeguards or detection evasion, or other misuse enabling content
• Create gold standard reference content that answers benign nuclear questions responsibly without introducing operationally sensitive detail
• Evaluate and rank model outputs on safe handling, correct risk framing, appropriate refusals, helpful redirection, scientific accuracy and clarity
• Detect hallucinated claims, incorrect physics, wrong units or activity figures, misleading risk statements, overconfident conclusions and unsafe recommendations
• Apply project rubrics consistently and provide clear written feedback explaining why content is safe, unsafe, incomplete or technically incorrect
• Ensure content uses precise nuclear terminology and communicates risk without exaggeration or minimization
• Escalate ambiguous, high risk or potentially harmful content for additional review per project guidelines
• Contribute across adjacent chemical, biological and radiological content where your background supports it

Requirements

• Bachelor's degree or higher in Nuclear Engineering, Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Health Physics, Radiation Science or a related field, or equivalent professional experience
• Minimum 3 years of professional experience in nuclear engineering, nuclear safety, criticality safety, reactor operations, fuel cycle, safeguards, decommissioning or technical review
• Experience or strong background in nuclear safety basis, criticality safety, radiological risk assessment, shielding, material control and accountability, or reactor systems
• Strong background in identifying unsafe instructions, operationally enabling detail, inappropriate specificity, misleading technical claims and unsupported conclusions
• Proven ability to evaluate technical content for accuracy, completeness and policy alignment, and to explain that judgment in precise written English

Skills

• Professional English proficiency at C1 minimum, sufficient to follow written guidelines and produce detailed written feedback
• Familiarity with 10 CFR 830, 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, NQA-1, DOE nuclear safety orders, NRC licensing, or IAEA safeguards concepts preferred
• Professional Engineer licensure, reactor operator licensure, or an active or recent DOE or DoD clearance preferred
• Prior experience with AI safety, data annotation, technical QA, policy review, risk assessment, red team review, scientific review or rubric based evaluation strongly preferred
• Reliable and self directed, able to deliver consistent quality in an hourly remote contractor workflow
• Must be a citizen of the United States, United Kingdom, Australia or New Zealand

Benefits

• Competitive Hourly Compensation: Up to $100 per hour as an independent contractor
• Paid Onboarding: You are paid for the onboarding program, not only for project work
• No Interview Process: Candidates we put forward go directly into paid onboarding
• Keep Your Current Role: Structured as supplemental work. No requirement to leave your position
• 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones
• Direct Impact on Nuclear Safeguards: Your judgment determines where these models draw the line on nuclear and radiological questions
• Work Inside Your Expertise: Technical review and reference writing in your own discipline, not general purpose data work
• Growing Engagement: An expanding program with continued need across all four CBRN domains

Pay