Naval Architecture Intern
- .
- Requirements: Might be "Basic Qualifications" etc. But we also have Qualifications and Skills separate. The instruction says use headings for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to map content accordingly.
We have "Basic Qualifications" list: Pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Naval Architecture or Marine Engineering. Proficiency in naval architecture software tools such as RHINO, GHS, SHCP, NavCAD, AutoCAD, and/or Microsoft Office Suite. Strong written and oral communication skills. Strong time management and organizational skills as an independent contributor. Ability to obtain and maintain a Secret Security Clearance. Active Secret Security Clearance preferred. U.S. Citizenship required.
These could go under Qualifications (or Requirements). The distinction: Requirements often are mandatory; Qualifications maybe preferred. But we can put them under Qualifications. However we also have a separate Skills heading; we could put software tools and communication etc under Skills. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's think: The posting includes "Basic Qualifications" which includes education, software proficiency, communication, time management, security clearance, citizenship. Those could be considered Qualifications. Skills could be separate: maybe "Proficiency in naval architecture software tools such as RHINO, GHS, SHCP, NavCAD, AutoCAD, and/or Microsoft Office Suite." and "Strong written and oral communication skills." and "Strong time management and organizational skills as an independent contributor." Those are skills. But we can also put them under Qualifications. The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we might combine Qualifications and Skills into one section? But we have to use headings only when there is real specific content. We could have Qualifications section containing education, clearance, citizenship. Skills section containing software tools, communication, time management. That would be two sections.
But we also have Requirements heading; maybe we can put the security clearance and citizenship under Requirements (since they are requirements). However we have to avoid duplication. Let's see typical job posting: Requirements often include education, experience, clearance, citizenship. Qualifications may be preferred qualifications. Skills may be technical skills. But we have only one list of basic qualifications. We could split: Requirements: U.S. Citizenship required; Ability to obtain and maintain a Secret Security Clearance; Active Secret Security Clearance preferred. Qualifications: Pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Naval Architecture or Marine Engineering. Skills: Proficiency in naval architecture software tools such as RHINO, GHS, SHCP, NavCAD, AutoCAD, and/or Microsoft Office Suite; Strong written and oral communication skills; Strong time management and organizational skills as an independent contributor.
That seems reasonable.
Now Benefits: There's a "Pay And Benefits" section: "Employment benefits include competitive compensation, Health and Wellness programs, Income Protection, Paid Leave and Retirement." Also earlier there is a generic statement about compensation packages. So we can list those benefits.
Pay: There's a Pay Range: $48,100.00 - $86,950.00. Also note that the pay range is a guideline. We should include the pay range as content. So Pay section with that range.
Schedule: Not mentioned anywhere. There's no schedule info (full-time, part-time, remote?). There's a "#Remote" at the end but that's a hashtag maybe indicating remote? The posting includes "#Remote" at the very end after the non-discrimination statement. That could indicate the position is remote. However it's just a hashtag; not explicit schedule. The instruction says: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. For Schedule, we have no explicit statement about schedule (like full-time, part-time, hours). The "#Remote" could be considered a schedule/location indicator but not schedule. Safer to omit Schedule section.
Now we need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay. Use
for each heading. Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use
for prose. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate/navigation/legal/EEO/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. We need to ensure we keep all substantive info: The description about Gibbs & Cox, the role, responsibilities, basic qualifications (education, clearance, citizenship), skills (software tools, communication, time management), benefits (competitive compensation, Health and Wellness programs, Income Protection, Paid Leave, Retirement), pay range. We also have some other sentences like "If you're looking for comfort, keep scrolling..." etc. That's motivational fluff but maybe considered boilerplate? It's not a standard boilerplate but it's promotional language. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. That fluff is not explicitly listed to remove, but it's not substantive info about the job; it's more marketing. However we need to preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The fluff is not substantive about the job; but it's part of the posting. Should we keep it? The instruction says remove boilerplate etc. It doesn't say remove motivational fluff. But we should aim to keep only substantive info about the role. The fluff like "If you're looking for comfort, keep scrolling. At Leidos, we outthink..." is not substantive about the role; it's more company culture. Could be considered boilerplate? Not sure. Safer to keep it? But the instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could include that fluff in About the role section as prose. However it's not about the role; it's about Leidos culture. Might be okay to include in About the role? The About the role section currently includes the description of Gibbs & Cox and the intern role. We could add that fluff as part of that prose. But it's not
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use