Medical Director - Heart Failure - US East Coast

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About Us? Actually "About Us" is a section heading? The instructions: use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should map content to those headings if present. The posting includes "About Us" (company description). That could be considered "About the role"? Not exactly. But we can treat "About Us" as a section heading maybe "About the role"? However they said do NOT repeat the job title as a heading. They gave examples of headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we should use those headings only when the posting has real specific content for them. Let's see what sections we have: - About Us (company overview) -> could map to "About the role"? Not exactly but maybe we can use "About the role" to describe the role purpose. There's a "Job Purpose" section. That could be "About the role". So we can put Job Purpose under

About the role

. - Job Responsibilities ->

Responsibilities

. - Required Experience and Capabilities -> could be Requirements or Qualifications. We have "Education & Professional Background", "Required Experience and Capabilities", "GCP Requirement", "Additional Preferred Experience". Those could go under Requirements or Qualifications. We'll decide: Use

Requirements

for mandatory requirements (education, experience, capabilities). Use

Qualifications

for preferred qualifications? But they said prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine into one Requirements section covering both required and preferred? But we need to preserve all info. Could have Requirements (required) and Qualifications (preferred). That's two sections. - Success Profile, Competencies, Attitude and Demeanor, Flexibility -> could be Skills? Or maybe we put under Skills. But they said use Skills heading for list of skills. We have competencies list. Could put under Skills. - Additional Information: budgetary responsibilities, traveling 65%, link to website, etc. Could be Benefits? Not really. No explicit Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Traveling 65% could be Schedule? Not exactly schedule but maybe we can put under Schedule? The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state traveling approx 65% of the time, which is about schedule/travel. Could be considered Schedule? Might be okay to include Schedule heading with that detail. However they said never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text. Traveling 65% is specific, so we can include Schedule. - Benefits: not mentioned. So omit Benefits. - Pay: not mentioned. Omit. - Requirements: we have education, experience, capabilities, GCP requirement. We'll list as

. - Qualifications: preferred experience (heart failure expertise, cardiovascular outcomes trial experience, launch/pre-launch experience, engaging US-based KOLs, experience across both clinical development and medical affairs, established KOL network). Also maybe "Additional Preferred Experience". We'll list as
. - Skills: competencies list (Attitude and Demeanor, Flexibility, etc). Could be a list. - About the role: Job Purpose paragraph. - Responsibilities: the two pillars with bullet points. We need to strip boilerplate: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. At end there is EEO statement etc. Remove that. Also remove "All job requirements listed indicate the minimum level..." etc. That's boilerplate; remove. Also remove "To learn more visit www.pharmacosmos.us" maybe keep? It's additional information but not boilerplate? It's a link; could keep as part of Additional Information but not a heading. Might be okay to keep as a p. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include the traveling 65% and link. Let's extract sections: About the role (Job Purpose): "This role offers the opportunity to help shape Pharmacosmos’ future presence in heart failure while supporting one of the company’s most important clinical development programs. The role sits at the interface of Clinical Development and Medical Affairs and has two complementary objectives Support successful execution and patient recruitment of the ICONIC-HF trial in the United States through investigator engagement, site support, insight generation, and identification of barriers to study execution. Build the scientific, stakeholder, and market foundation for future IV iron adoption in heart failure, including KOL engagement, strategic insight generation, advocacy development, launch readiness, and future medical-marketing support. The relative emphasis of the role is expected to evolve over time. During active execution of ICONIC-HF, the primary focus will be investigator engagement, site support, and insight generation related to trial execution. As the program matures, the center of gravity is expected to shift progressively toward heart failure market understanding, advocacy development, launch readiness, and broader medical affairs support for the future heart failure franchise. The successful candidate will work closely with both the US affiliate and global headquarters in Denmark and will have regular interaction with cross-functional leadership teams across Clinical Development, Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, and Market Access. The role is intended for an individual who enjoys combining scientific engagement, strategic thinking, and execution in a highly collaborative global environment." We need to keep that as

. Responsibilities: The responsibilities are structured in two complementary pillars Boundaries of the Role Trial Support ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement ... then list many bullet-like sentences. We need to convert to

• . The text includes many sentences separated by periods. We'll need to parse them into list items. Probably each sentence starting with a verb. We'll create list items for each distinct responsibility. Let's extract responsibilities text: "Boundaries of the Role Trial Support ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement The purpose of this pillar is to strengthen investigator engagement, facilitate communication, and generate insights that support successful trial execution.Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.Does not function as a CRA.Does not perform monitoring activities.Does not conduct source data verification.Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO." Then second pillar: "Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness The purpose of this pillar is to establish Pharmacosmos as a trusted scientific partner in heart failure while building the foundation for future adoption of IV iron in this therapeutic area.Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements." We need to split into list items. We'll treat each sentence as an item, but some sentences are long with multiple clauses separated by commas but still one responsibility. We'll keep as is. Also note the "Does not function as a CRA..." etc are negative statements; we should keep them as list items. Now Requirements: Education & Professional Background: "Advanced scientific or healthcare degree preferred, e.g., MD, PharmD, PhD, NP, PA, MSc, or equivalent." That's preferred but we can put under Requirements? It says preferred, but we can still include. However we might separate required vs preferred. The required experience: "Experience within cardiology is required; heart failure experience is preferred." So cardiology experience required, heart failure preferred. "Experience from clinical development, research and/or Medical Affairs." That's required? Probably required. "Demonstrated understanding of clinical trial conduct and investigator engagement." Required. "Experience collaborating with investigators, academic institutions, and cross-functional internal stakeholders." Required. "Ability to work effectively within cross-functional and matrix organizations." Required. "Strong scientific communication, relationship-building, and stakeholder-management skills." Required. "Ability to translate external insights into actionable recommendations for internal stakeholders." Required. "GCP Requirement Basic GCP training or certification is preferred. Training can be provided for an otherwise qualified candidate." So GCP preferred. We'll list required items as
  under Requirements. For preferred items we could put under Qualifications. Thus Requirements (mandatory): - Experience within cardiology is required. - Experience from clinical development, research and/or Medical Affairs. - Demonstrated understanding of clinical trial conduct and investigator engagement. - Experience collaborating with investigators, academic institutions, and cross-functional internal stakeholders. - Ability to work effectively within cross-functional and matrix organizations. - Strong scientific communication, relationship-building, and stakeholder-management skills. - Ability to translate external insights into actionable recommendations for internal stakeholders. (Optionally include heart failure experience as preferred, not required.) Qualifications (preferred): - Advanced scientific or healthcare degree (e.g., MD, PharmD, PhD, NP, PA, MSc, or equivalent). - Heart failure experience. - Cardiovascular outcomes trial experience. - Launch or pre-launch experience. - Experience engaging US-based KOLs and national thought leaders. - Experience working across both clinical development and medical affairs environments. - Established KOL network within heart failure/cardiology. - Basic GCP training or certification (training can be provided). Now Skills: Competencies list: Attitude and Demeanor: Proud Pharmacosmos ambassador, Strong personal leadership, Inspire cross-functional transparency and collaboration, Customer-centric ‘can-do’ attitude and goal focused, Ambitious, independent, analytical, collaborative, loyal, organized, Exemplifies Medical Affairs TRAC (Trust, Respect, Accountability, Collaboration) values. Flexibility: Our roles can evolve over time. Reasonable flexibility is, therefore, a key part of any job at Pharmacosmos. Significant variations in duties and responsibilities should be discussed between the employee and manager. We can list as bullet points. Additional Information: budgetary responsibilities and discretion with confidential data, traveling approx 65% of the time, link to website. We could put under a section maybe "Additional Information" but not in allowed headings. Could incorporate into Schedule (traveling) and maybe a paragraph for budgetary responsibilities. Since Schedule heading is allowed if we have schedule info. We have traveling 65% - that's schedule/travel. We'll put Schedule heading with that info. Budgetary responsibilities