Medical Director - Heart Failure - US East Coast
Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. · Washington, DC · 1 mo ago
RemoteRemoteHealthcareFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections for headings that have real content. The posting includes sections: About Us (but we should not repeat job title; About Us is a section heading? The instruction: use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says use those examples but not limited? It says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says use those examples but not limited? It says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should map content to those headings if present. The posting has "About Us" (similar to About the role? Actually About Us is company overview). Could treat as About the role? But they said do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID etc. They didn't forbid About Us heading. However they gave examples; we can use About Us as heading if content exists. Probably better to use "About the role" for job purpose description. The posting includes "Job Purpose". That could map to About the role. Then "Job Responsibilities" -> Responsibilities. Then "Required Experience and Capabilities" etc -> Requirements/Qualifications/Skills. There's also "Education". Could be Qualifications. Also "Success Profile", "Competencies". Could be Skills. Also "Additional Information" includes travel, budgetary responsibilities. Could be other but not in list; maybe we omit if not matching headings. We should only include sections when posting has real specific content. We need to preserve all substantive info; we can't omit details. So we need to include all info under appropriate headings. If a heading doesn't match exactly, we could still use with the heading from posting (like "Job Purpose", "Job Responsibilities", "Required Experience and Capabilities", "Education", "Success Profile", "Competencies", "Additional Information"). The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests using those. Safer to map to those standard headings. Let's map:
- About the role: Job Purpose (maybe also About Us? but we can incorporate company overview into About the role? Might be weird). Better to have About the role = Job Purpose. And we could also include About Us as a separate section? Not in list but could be okay. However they said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe combine About Us and Job Purpose into About the role? But About Us is company overview, not role. Might be better to keep About Us as its own section, but not in examples. I'd risk using About Us as heading; it's still a section heading. The instruction didn't forbid other headings; just gave examples. So we can use About Us, Job Purpose, Job Responsibilities, Required Experience and Capabilities, Education, Success Profile, Competencies, Additional Information. That seems fine.
We need to use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The posting has many bullet-like sentences but not explicit bullet list. We need to identify lists. For responsibilities, there are many sentences describing duties; we could wrap each duty in
- . Similarly for requirements. We'll need to parse.
Let's extract sections:
1. About Us: paragraph(s) about company.
2. Job Purpose: paragraph(s) describing role.
3. Job Responsibilities: two pillars with many bullet-like sentences.
We need to convert each sentence that is a duty into
- . Might be many; we can group under
.
Similarly for Required Experience and Capabilities: list of items.
Education: paragraph.
Success Profile: paragraph.
Competencies: list of items (Attitude and Demeanor, Flexibility). Actually "Competencies" includes subheadings: Attitude and Demeanor (list of traits) and Flexibility (paragraph). We'll treat as list.
Additional Information: paragraph(s) about budgetary responsibilities, travel, link, etc.
We must not include boilerplate like EEO etc. At the end there is EEO statement; we must remove.
Also remove duplicated lines, cookie/navigation/legal etc. Not present.
Now craft HTML.
We'll start with About Us
then ...
.
Then Job Purpose
...
.
Then Job Responsibilities
with - for each duty.
We need to extract duties from the two pillars.
Let's copy responsibilities text:
"Boundaries of the Role Trial Support ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement The purpose of this pillar is to strengthen investigator engagement, facilitate communication, and generate insights that support successful trial execution.Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.Does not function as a CRA.Does not perform monitoring activities.Does not conduct source data verification.Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO."
Then second pillar:
"Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness The purpose of this pillar is to establish Pharmacosmos as a trusted scientific partner in heart failure while building the foundation for future adoption of IV iron in this therapeutic area.Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements."
We need to split into list items. Each sentence separated by period. We'll create
- for each sentence (excluding the introductory sentences that describe purpose? Those are also duties? Could include as
- as well). We'll just treat each sentence after the purpose statement as a duty.
Simplify: We'll create two
maybe one per pillar, but instruction says use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Could have multiple lists.
We'll do:
Job Responsibilities
Trial Support – ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement
...
Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness
...
But we are not supposed to add extra headings not in examples? Not prohibited. Might be okay. But to keep simple, we can just have one with all duties.
Let's extract sentences:
Pillar1 sentences after purpose:
1. Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.
2. Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.
3. Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.
4. Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.
5. Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.
6. Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.
7. Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.
8. Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.
9. Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.
10. Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.
11. Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.
12. Does not function as a CRA.
13. Does not perform monitoring activities.
14. Does not conduct source data verification.
15. Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.
16. Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO.
Note sentence 16 includes two sentences? Actually "Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO." We'll split.
So 16a: Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations.
16b: These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO.
Pillar2 sentences after purpose:
1. Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.
2. Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.
3. Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.
4. Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.
5. Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.
6. Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.
7. Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.
8. Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements.
Now Required Experience and Capabilities:
"Experience within cardiology is required; heart failure experience is preferred.Experience from clinical development, research and/or Medical Affairs.Demonstrated understanding of clinical trial conduct and investigator engagement.Experience collaborating with investigators, academic institutions, and cross-functional internal stakeholders.Ability to work effectively within cross-functional and matrix organizations.Strong scientific communication, relationship-building, and stakeholder-management skills.Ability to translate external insights into actionable recommendations for internal stakeholders. GCP Requirement Basic GCP training or certification is preferred. Training can be provided for an otherwise qualified candidate. Additional Preferred Experience Heart failure expertise.Cardiovascular outcomes trial experience.Launch or pre-launch
with the heading from posting (like "Job Purpose", "Job Responsibilities", "Required Experience and Capabilities", "Education", "Success Profile", "Competencies", "Additional Information"). The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests using those. Safer to map to those standard headings. Let's map:
- About the role: Job Purpose (maybe also About Us? but we can incorporate company overview into About the role? Might be weird). Better to have About the role = Job Purpose. And we could also include About Us as a separate section? Not in list but could be okay. However they said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe combine About Us and Job Purpose into About the role? But About Us is company overview, not role. Might be better to keep About Us as its own section, but not in examples. I'd risk using About Us as heading; it's still a section heading. The instruction didn't forbid other headings; just gave examples. So we can use About Us, Job Purpose, Job Responsibilities, Required Experience and Capabilities, Education, Success Profile, Competencies, Additional Information. That seems fine.
We need to use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The posting has many bullet-like sentences but not explicit bullet list. We need to identify lists. For responsibilities, there are many sentences describing duties; we could wrap each duty in
- . Similarly for requirements. We'll need to parse.
Let's extract sections:
1. About Us: paragraph(s) about company.
2. Job Purpose: paragraph(s) describing role.
3. Job Responsibilities: two pillars with many bullet-like sentences.
We need to convert each sentence that is a duty into
- . Might be many; we can group under
.
Similarly for Required Experience and Capabilities: list of items.
Education: paragraph.
Success Profile: paragraph.
Competencies: list of items (Attitude and Demeanor, Flexibility). Actually "Competencies" includes subheadings: Attitude and Demeanor (list of traits) and Flexibility (paragraph). We'll treat as list.
Additional Information: paragraph(s) about budgetary responsibilities, travel, link, etc.
We must not include boilerplate like EEO etc. At the end there is EEO statement; we must remove.
Also remove duplicated lines, cookie/navigation/legal etc. Not present.
Now craft HTML.
We'll start with About Us
then ...
.
Then Job Purpose
...
.
Then Job Responsibilities
with - for each duty.
We need to extract duties from the two pillars.
Let's copy responsibilities text:
"Boundaries of the Role Trial Support ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement The purpose of this pillar is to strengthen investigator engagement, facilitate communication, and generate insights that support successful trial execution.Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.Does not function as a CRA.Does not perform monitoring activities.Does not conduct source data verification.Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO."
Then second pillar:
"Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness The purpose of this pillar is to establish Pharmacosmos as a trusted scientific partner in heart failure while building the foundation for future adoption of IV iron in this therapeutic area.Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements."
We need to split into list items. Each sentence separated by period. We'll create
- for each sentence (excluding the introductory sentences that describe purpose? Those are also duties? Could include as
- as well). We'll just treat each sentence after the purpose statement as a duty.
Simplify: We'll create two
maybe one per pillar, but instruction says use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Could have multiple lists.
We'll do:
Job Responsibilities
Trial Support – ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement
...
Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness
...
But we are not supposed to add extra headings not in examples? Not prohibited. Might be okay. But to keep simple, we can just have one with all duties.
Let's extract sentences:
Pillar1 sentences after purpose:
1. Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.
2. Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.
3. Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.
4. Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.
5. Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.
6. Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.
7. Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.
8. Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.
9. Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.
10. Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.
11. Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.
12. Does not function as a CRA.
13. Does not perform monitoring activities.
14. Does not conduct source data verification.
15. Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.
16. Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO.
Note sentence 16 includes two sentences? Actually "Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO." We'll split.
So 16a: Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations.
16b: These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO.
Pillar2 sentences after purpose:
1. Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.
2. Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.
3. Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.
4. Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.
5. Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.
6. Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.
7. Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.
8. Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements.
Now Required Experience and Capabilities:
"Experience within cardiology is required; heart failure experience is preferred.Experience from clinical development, research and/or Medical Affairs.Demonstrated understanding of clinical trial conduct and investigator engagement.Experience collaborating with investigators, academic institutions, and cross-functional internal stakeholders.Ability to work effectively within cross-functional and matrix organizations.Strong scientific communication, relationship-building, and stakeholder-management skills.Ability to translate external insights into actionable recommendations for internal stakeholders. GCP Requirement Basic GCP training or certification is preferred. Training can be provided for an otherwise qualified candidate. Additional Preferred Experience Heart failure expertise.Cardiovascular outcomes trial experience.Launch or pre-launch
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The posting has many bullet-like sentences but not explicit bullet list. We need to identify lists. For responsibilities, there are many sentences describing duties; we could wrap each duty in
- . Similarly for requirements. We'll need to parse. Let's extract sections: 1. About Us: paragraph(s) about company. 2. Job Purpose: paragraph(s) describing role. 3. Job Responsibilities: two pillars with many bullet-like sentences. We need to convert each sentence that is a duty into
- . Might be many; we can group under
- .
Similarly for Required Experience and Capabilities: list of items.
Education: paragraph.
Success Profile: paragraph.
Competencies: list of items (Attitude and Demeanor, Flexibility). Actually "Competencies" includes subheadings: Attitude and Demeanor (list of traits) and Flexibility (paragraph). We'll treat as list.
Additional Information: paragraph(s) about budgetary responsibilities, travel, link, etc.
We must not include boilerplate like EEO etc. At the end there is EEO statement; we must remove.
Also remove duplicated lines, cookie/navigation/legal etc. Not present.
Now craft HTML.
We'll start with
- for each duty. We need to extract duties from the two pillars. Let's copy responsibilities text: "Boundaries of the Role Trial Support ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement The purpose of this pillar is to strengthen investigator engagement, facilitate communication, and generate insights that support successful trial execution.Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.Does not function as a CRA.Does not perform monitoring activities.Does not conduct source data verification.Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO." Then second pillar: "Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness The purpose of this pillar is to establish Pharmacosmos as a trusted scientific partner in heart failure while building the foundation for future adoption of IV iron in this therapeutic area.Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements." We need to split into list items. Each sentence separated by period. We'll create
- for each sentence (excluding the introductory sentences that describe purpose? Those are also duties? Could include as
- as well). We'll just treat each sentence after the purpose statement as a duty.
Simplify: We'll create two
- maybe one per pillar, but instruction says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Could have multiple lists.
We'll do:
Job Responsibilities
Trial Support – ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement
- ...
Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness
- ...
- with all duties.
Let's extract sentences:
Pillar1 sentences after purpose:
1. Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.
2. Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.
3. Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.
4. Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.
5. Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.
6. Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.
7. Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.
8. Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.
9. Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.
10. Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.
11. Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.
12. Does not function as a CRA.
13. Does not perform monitoring activities.
14. Does not conduct source data verification.
15. Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.
16. Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO.
Note sentence 16 includes two sentences? Actually "Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO." We'll split.
So 16a: Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations.
16b: These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO.
Pillar2 sentences after purpose:
1. Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.
2. Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.
3. Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.
4. Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.
5. Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.
6. Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.
7. Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.
8. Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements.
Now Required Experience and Capabilities:
"Experience within cardiology is required; heart failure experience is preferred.Experience from clinical development, research and/or Medical Affairs.Demonstrated understanding of clinical trial conduct and investigator engagement.Experience collaborating with investigators, academic institutions, and cross-functional internal stakeholders.Ability to work effectively within cross-functional and matrix organizations.Strong scientific communication, relationship-building, and stakeholder-management skills.Ability to translate external insights into actionable recommendations for internal stakeholders. GCP Requirement Basic GCP training or certification is preferred. Training can be provided for an otherwise qualified candidate. Additional Preferred Experience Heart failure expertise.Cardiovascular outcomes trial experience.Launch or pre-launch
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Could have multiple lists.
We'll do:
About Us
then...
. ThenJob Purpose
...
. ThenJob Responsibilities
- with