Medical Director - Heart Failure - US East Coast

We need to output HTML fragment with headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes "About Us" (company description) but not "About the role". There's "Job Purpose". Could map to "About the role"? The instruction: use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we need to decide which sections are present. We have: - About Us (company description) – could be considered "About the role"? Not exactly. But maybe we treat as "About the role"? The instruction says do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it. So we can include an "About the role" section summarizing job purpose? The posting includes "Job Purpose" paragraph. That could be placed under

About the role

with

content. - Responsibilities: we have "Job Responsibilities" with two pillars and details. So we can include

Responsibilities

with

• items. - Requirements: we have "Education & Professional Background", "Required Experience and Capabilities", "GCP Requirement", "Additional Preferred Experience". Could combine into Requirements section. - Qualifications: maybe same as Requirements? But we can include Qualifications if there is content like "Advanced scientific or healthcare degree preferred". Might be overlapping. The instruction: prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Education, Experience, GCP into one Requirements section. - Skills: we have "Strong scientific communication, relationship-building, and stakeholder-management skills." etc. Could be part of Requirements or separate Skills. Might be thin. - Benefits, Pay, Schedule: not present (no specifics). So we should NOT include those sections. Thus output sections: About the role (Job Purpose), Responsibilities, Requirements (including Education, Experience, GCP, Preferred Experience), maybe Skills (if we want). But we can embed skills within Requirements. We must preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from the posting, but we can format as lists. We must remove boilerplate: EEO, legal, navigation, cookie, etc. At the end there is EEO statement; we must drop that. Also "All job requirements listed indicate the minimum level..." etc. That's generic; maybe we can drop as boilerplate? It's not EEO but it's a generic statement. The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The statement about job requirements not exhaustive may be considered boilerplate? It's not exactly EEO but it's a generic disclaimer. Might be considered boilerplate; safer to drop it. Also the final EEO paragraph definitely drop. Also "To learn more visit www.pharmacosmos.us" maybe keep? It's not boilerplate? It's a link; could be considered minor metadata; we could fold into a short

  or drop. Probably drop as it's not substantive to role. We need to keep all substantive info: About Us description, Job Purpose, Responsibilities details (two pillars with bullet-like sentences), Education & Professional Background, Required Experience and Capabilities, GCP Requirement, Additional Preferred Experience, Success Profile, Competencies, Flexibility, Additional Information (budgetary responsibilities, travel 65%). Also maybe "Success Profile" and "Competencies" could be part of Requirements or separate sections. But we can include them under Requirements or as separate sections like "Qualifications". However we need to avoid thin sections. We could have sections: About the role (Job Purpose + About Us?), Responsibilities, Requirements (including Education, Experience, GCP, Preferred Experience, Success Profile, Competencies, Flexibility, Additional Information). That seems substantive. We must not repeat job title as heading. No job title given in snippet; fine. We must output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. Let's craft. Structure:

  About the role

  Job Purpose paragraph (maybe two paragraphs). Also include About Us? Could be separate

  About the company

  but not in allowed headings list. The instruction says use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use those for those sections. It might be okay to add other headings? Safer to stick to those. So we put About the role includes both Job Purpose and About Us? Could combine. Thus

  About the role

  About Us paragraph...

  Job Purpose paragraph...

  Then

  Responsibilities

  • ... each bullet from responsibilities.
  We need to break responsibilities into items. The responsibilities are described in paragraphs; we can convert each sentence or clause into
• . Must preserve all info. Let's extract responsibilities text: From "Job Responsibilities The responsibilities are structured in two complementary pillars Boundaries of the Role Trial Support ICONIC-HF Site Engagement and Enrollment Enablement The purpose of this pillar is to strengthen investigator engagement, facilitate communication, and generate insights that support successful trial execution.Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF.Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks.Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO.Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help defining mitigations activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified.Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks.Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders.Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate.Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant.Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO.Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle.Does not function as a CRA.Does not perform monitoring activities.Does not conduct source data verification.Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets.Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO. Strategic Heart Failure Insights, Advocacy Development and Launch Readiness The purpose of this pillar is to establish Pharmacosmos as a trusted scientific partner in heart failure while building the foundation for future adoption of IV iron in this therapeutic area.Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron.Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders.Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network.Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness.Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations.Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities.Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure.Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements." We need to split into sensible list items. Could group by pillar. We'll create two subheadings? Not allowed? Could just list items. We'll produce
  • ... each bullet. We need to ensure we don't lose any detail. Let's list items for first pillar: - Establish and maintain strong scientific relationships with investigators, study coordinators, and other site personnel involved in ICONIC-HF. - Conduct regular site engagements, virtually and in person where relevant, to understand local opportunities, challenges, operational barriers and operate within compliance, GCP, and trial governance frameworks. - Serve as a US-based scientific liaison between participating sites and the HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team in coordination with the US affiliate and the contracted CRO. - Identify, understand, and communicate barriers that may impact screening, enrollment, site engagement, or study execution, analyze potential root causes, and help define mitigation activities with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO. - Facilitate appropriate cross-functional problem solving and escalation pathways when barriers are identified. - Support protocol understanding and scientific discussions within approved governance frameworks. - Gather and communicate investigator insights, competitive intelligence, protocol feedback, and study-related observations to internal stakeholders. - Organize and facilitate regional sponsor-investigator touchpoint meetings as appropriate. - Identify and share best practices from successful sites to support broader site engagement efforts, where appropriate and compliant. - Support site activation and engagement initiatives in partnership with HQ R&D ICONIC-HF trial team and the CRO. - Maintain a strong understanding of site experiences and investigator perspectives throughout the study lifecycle. - Does not function as a CRA. - Does not perform monitoring activities. - Does not conduct source data verification. - Does not own enrollment metrics or site performance targets. - Does not manage day-to-day clinical trial operations. These responsibilities remain with HQ Clinical Operations and the CRO. Second pillar: - Develop a deep understanding of the evolving US heart failure landscape, including treatment pathways, referral patterns, unmet needs, evidence gaps, barriers to adoption, and emerging trends relevant to IV iron. - Map, prioritize, and engage regional and national heart failure thought leaders. - Build and maintain scientific relationships with key experts beyond the ICONIC-HF investigator network. - Generate actionable insights that can support future evidence generation, publication planning, congress activities, scientific communication, advisory board strategy, and launch readiness. - Partner closely with HQ and the US affiliate to ensure field insights are translated into strategic recommendations. - Support identification and prioritization of investigator-sponsored research opportunities. - Contribute to long-term medical affairs strategy and launch-readiness planning for IV iron in heart failure. - Support future launch-readiness initiatives through close partnership with Medical Affairs, Strategy and Operations, Market Access, and Commercial colleagues while maintaining full compliance with applicable governance requirements. Now Requirements section: include Education & Professional Background, Required Experience and Capabilities, GCP Requirement, Additional Preferred Experience, Success Profile, Competencies, Flexibility, Additional Information (budgetary responsibilities, travel 65%). Also maybe "Success Profile" and "Competencies" are descriptive; we can include as list items. Let's extract: Education & Professional Background: "Advanced scientific or healthcare degree preferred, e.g., MD, PharmD, PhD, NP, PA, MSc, or equivalent." Required Experience and Capabilities: - Experience within cardiology is required; heart failure experience is preferred. - Experience from clinical development, research and/or Medical Affairs. - Demonstrated understanding of clinical trial conduct and investigator engagement. - Experience collaborating with investigators, academic institutions, and cross-functional internal stakeholders. - Ability to work effectively within cross-functional and matrix organizations. - Strong scientific communication, relationship-building, and stakeholder-management skills. - Ability to translate external insights into actionable recommendations for internal stakeholders. GCP Requirement: "Basic GCP training or certification is preferred. Training can be provided for an otherwise qualified candidate." Additional Preferred Experience: - Heart failure expertise. - Cardiovascular outcomes trial experience. - Launch or pre-launch experience. - Experience engaging US-based KOLs and national