Manufacturing Technology Engineer
Qnity · Parlin, NJ · 1 mo ago
On-siteEngineering$112k–$175k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with headings for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Preserve all substantive info.
We need to parse the posting.
Content:
- Intro paragraph: "Are you looking to power the next leap..." etc. That's about the role? Could be "About the role" or maybe "About the company". But we need sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We have:
- Position Summary: "Qnity is seeking a Manufacturing Technology Engineer. This individual will be responsible for leading and sustaining Process Safety Management (PSM) programs while identifying and implementing continuous improvement initiatives that enhance safety, quality, reliability, capacity, and cost performance. Partnering closely with Operations, Engineering, EH&S, and Manufacturing Technology teams, this role provides technical leadership for process safety compliance, capital projects, process optimization, root cause analysis, and manufacturing performance improvements. This role is 100% onsite in our Parlin, New Jersey facility. Candidates currently living within a daily commutable distance to this location will be given priority. Please note: Sponsorship is not available now or in the future for this role."
That's about the role (summary). Could be "About the role".
- What You'll Do: list of duties. That's responsibilities.
- Minimum Qualifications: bullet list. That's requirements/qualifications.
- Preferred Qualifications: bullet list. Could be "Preferred Qualifications" maybe under Skills? But we have sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide mapping.
We have Minimum Qualifications (required) and Preferred Qualifications (preferred). Could combine into Requirements (minimum) and Qualifications (preferred) or Skills.
Better: Use "Requirements" for minimum qualifications, "Preferred Qualifications" maybe as "Qualifications" (but we already have Qualifications). Or we could treat "Skills" as derived from both.
But instructions: Use headings for section names exactly as given: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we must use those exact headings.
We need to decide what content goes under each.
- About the role: could include the introductory paragraph and position summary (company description, role overview). Should not repeat job title.
- Responsibilities: the "What You'll Do" list.
- Requirements: Minimum Qualifications (required).
- Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications (preferred). Or maybe "Qualifications" could be both required and preferred? But we have separate Requirements and Qualifications headings. Likely Requirements = minimum qualifications, Qualifications = preferred qualifications.
- Skills: Could extract skills from both sets: e.g., strong knowledge of PSM, troubleshooting, problem-solving, process optimization, communication, collaboration, project leadership, etc. But we must not invent or summarize away detail; we must preserve all substantive information. If we put skills as a separate section, we need to list them explicitly from the posting. The posting includes: "Strong knowledge of Process Safety Management (PSM) principles and regulatory requirements." "Experience leading root cause investigations and implementing process changes." "Demonstrated troubleshooting, problem-solving, and process optimization skills." "Excellent communication, collaboration, and project leadership abilities." Also preferred: "Experience leading or supporting capital projects from concept through implementation." "Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) facilitation experience." "Knowledge of Mechanical Integrity programs and reliability improvement methodologies." "Experience with continuous improvement tools and operational excellence initiatives." "Demonstrated ability to drive change and influence cross-functional teams in a manufacturing environment."
We could put those under Skills. However, we must not duplicate content already in Requirements/Qualifications. But it's okay if some overlap? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. It doesn't forbid duplication, but better to avoid redundancy. However, we could place the skill statements under Skills and keep Requirements/Qualifications as just the bullet points (maybe without the skill descriptors). But the Minimum Qualifications bullet points already include those skill statements. For example: "Strong knowledge of Process Safety Management (PSM) principles and regulatory requirements." That is a skill. If we put it under Requirements, we might not need Skills section. But we need to decide if we include Skills section only if there is real specific content not already covered. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe we can omit Skills if its content is covered elsewhere. But we must include a section only when posting has real, specific content for it. If we put skill statements under Requirements, then Skills section would be empty or filler, which we must avoid. So better to not include Skills section unless we have distinct skill content not captured elsewhere.
We have Benefits, Pay, Schedule sections. The posting mentions: "Qnity offers a comprehensive pay and benefits package. To learn more visit the Compensation and Benefits page." No specific benefits listed. Pay range: "$111,580.00 - $175,340.00 Annual". That's pay. Schedule: "This role is 100% onsite in our Parlin, New Jersey facility." That's schedule (onsite). So we can include Pay and Schedule sections with that info. Benefits: we have only generic statement about comprehensive pay and benefits package, but no specifics. That's not specific content; we should not create Benefits section because it would be filler ("comprehensive pay and benefits package" is vague). The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). "Comprehensive pay and benefits package" is vague but not exactly placeholder; still it's not specific detail. Safer to omit Benefits section.
Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Pay, Schedule. Possibly Skills omitted.
Now we need to format.
About the role: combine introductory paragraphs and position summary. Should we include the initial motivational sentences? They are about the role/company. Could be included.
Let's craft:
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Preserve all substantive info.
We need to parse the posting.
Content:
- Intro paragraph: "Are you looking to power the next leap..." etc. That's about the role? Could be "About the role" or maybe "About the company". But we need sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We have:
- Position Summary: "Qnity is seeking a Manufacturing Technology Engineer. This individual will be responsible for leading and sustaining Process Safety Management (PSM) programs while identifying and implementing continuous improvement initiatives that enhance safety, quality, reliability, capacity, and cost performance. Partnering closely with Operations, Engineering, EH&S, and Manufacturing Technology teams, this role provides technical leadership for process safety compliance, capital projects, process optimization, root cause analysis, and manufacturing performance improvements. This role is 100% onsite in our Parlin, New Jersey facility. Candidates currently living within a daily commutable distance to this location will be given priority. Please note: Sponsorship is not available now or in the future for this role."
That's about the role (summary). Could be "About the role".
- What You'll Do: list of duties. That's responsibilities.
- Minimum Qualifications: bullet list. That's requirements/qualifications.
- Preferred Qualifications: bullet list. Could be "Preferred Qualifications" maybe under Skills? But we have sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide mapping.
We have Minimum Qualifications (required) and Preferred Qualifications (preferred). Could combine into Requirements (minimum) and Qualifications (preferred) or Skills.
Better: Use "Requirements" for minimum qualifications, "Preferred Qualifications" maybe as "Qualifications" (but we already have Qualifications). Or we could treat "Skills" as derived from both.
But instructions: Use headings for section names exactly as given: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we must use those exact headings.
We need to decide what content goes under each.
- About the role: could include the introductory paragraph and position summary (company description, role overview). Should not repeat job title.
- Responsibilities: the "What You'll Do" list.
- Requirements: Minimum Qualifications (required).
- Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications (preferred). Or maybe "Qualifications" could be both required and preferred? But we have separate Requirements and Qualifications headings. Likely Requirements = minimum qualifications, Qualifications = preferred qualifications.
- Skills: Could extract skills from both sets: e.g., strong knowledge of PSM, troubleshooting, problem-solving, process optimization, communication, collaboration, project leadership, etc. But we must not invent or summarize away detail; we must preserve all substantive information. If we put skills as a separate section, we need to list them explicitly from the posting. The posting includes: "Strong knowledge of Process Safety Management (PSM) principles and regulatory requirements." "Experience leading root cause investigations and implementing process changes." "Demonstrated troubleshooting, problem-solving, and process optimization skills." "Excellent communication, collaboration, and project leadership abilities." Also preferred: "Experience leading or supporting capital projects from concept through implementation." "Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) facilitation experience." "Knowledge of Mechanical Integrity programs and reliability improvement methodologies." "Experience with continuous improvement tools and operational excellence initiatives." "Demonstrated ability to drive change and influence cross-functional teams in a manufacturing environment."
We could put those under Skills. However, we must not duplicate content already in Requirements/Qualifications. But it's okay if some overlap? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. It doesn't forbid duplication, but better to avoid redundancy. However, we could place the skill statements under Skills and keep Requirements/Qualifications as just the bullet points (maybe without the skill descriptors). But the Minimum Qualifications bullet points already include those skill statements. For example: "Strong knowledge of Process Safety Management (PSM) principles and regulatory requirements." That is a skill. If we put it under Requirements, we might not need Skills section. But we need to decide if we include Skills section only if there is real specific content not already covered. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe we can omit Skills if its content is covered elsewhere. But we must include a section only when posting has real, specific content for it. If we put skill statements under Requirements, then Skills section would be empty or filler, which we must avoid. So better to not include Skills section unless we have distinct skill content not captured elsewhere.
We have Benefits, Pay, Schedule sections. The posting mentions: "Qnity offers a comprehensive pay and benefits package. To learn more visit the Compensation and Benefits page." No specific benefits listed. Pay range: "$111,580.00 - $175,340.00 Annual". That's pay. Schedule: "This role is 100% onsite in our Parlin, New Jersey facility." That's schedule (onsite). So we can include Pay and Schedule sections with that info. Benefits: we have only generic statement about comprehensive pay and benefits package, but no specifics. That's not specific content; we should not create Benefits section because it would be filler ("comprehensive pay and benefits package" is vague). The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). "Comprehensive pay and benefits package" is vague but not exactly placeholder; still it's not specific detail. Safer to omit Benefits section.
Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Pay, Schedule. Possibly Skills omitted.
Now we need to format.
About the role: combine introductory paragraphs and position summary. Should we include the initial motivational sentences? They are about the role/company. Could be included.
Let's craft:
About the role
Are you looking to power the next leap in the exciting world of advanced electronics? Do you want to help solve problems that drive success in the rapidly evolving technology and connectivity landscape? Then bring your problem-solving, passion, and creativity to help us power the next leap in electronics. At Qnity, we’re more than a global leader in materials and solutions for advanced electronics and high-tech industries – we’re a tight-knit team that is motivated by new possibilities, and always up for a challenge. All our dedicated teams contribute to making cutting-edge technology possible. We value forward-thinking challengers, boundary-pushers, and diverse perspectives across all our departments, because we know we play a critical role in the world enabling faster progress for all. Learn how you can start or jumpstart your career with us.
Qnity is seeking a Manufacturing Technology Engineer. This individual will be responsible for leading and sustaining Process Safety Management (PSM) programs while identifying and implementing continuous improvement initiatives that enhance safety, quality, reliability, capacity, and cost performance. Partnering closely with Operations, Engineering, EH&S, and Manufacturing Technology teams, this role provides technical leadership for process safety compliance, capital projects, process optimization, root cause analysis, and manufacturing performance improvements. This role is 100% onsite in our Parlin, New Jersey facility. Candidates currently living within a daily commutable distance to this location will be given priority. Please note: Sponsorship is not available now or in the future for this role.
That seems good. Responsibilities: list from "What You'll Do". Use- .
Responsibilities
- Lead and maintain site Process Safety Management (PSM) programs and regulatory compliance activities.
- Facilitate Process Hazard Analyses (PHAs), Management of Change (MOC) processes, incident investigations, and Pre-Startup Safety Reviews (PSSRs).
- Maintain and improve Process Safety Information (PSI), operating procedures, and process safety documentation.
- Drive manufacturing process improvements that enhance safety, quality, reliability, throughput, and cost performance.
- Lead or support root cause investigations, troubleshooting activities, and implementation of corrective actions.
- Participate in the development and execution of capital projects and technology deployment initiatives.
- Support raw material qualifications, product trials, and operational readiness activities.
- Partner with Operations, EH&S, Engineering, and R&D teams to deliver sustainable performance improvements.
- Provide technical mentorship and coaching while promoting a strong safety and continuous improvement culture.
Requirements
- Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, or a related engineering discipline.
- 7+ years of manufacturing, process engineering, or related industrial experience.
- Experience working in a chemical manufacturing or higher-hazard process environment.
- Strong knowledge of Process Safety Management (PSM) principles and regulatory requirements.
- Experience leading root cause investigations and implementing process changes.
- Demonstrated troubleshooting, problem-solving, and process optimization skills.
- Excellent communication, collaboration, and project leadership abilities.
Qualifications
- Experience leading or supporting capital projects from concept through implementation.
- Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) facilitation experience.
- Knowledge of Mechanical Integrity programs and reliability improvement methodologies.
- Experience with continuous improvement tools and operational excellence initiatives.
- Demonstrated ability to drive change and influence cross-functional teams in a manufacturing environment.
Pay
The pay range for this role is $111,580.00 - $175,340.00 Annual.
Schedule: include onsite.Schedule
This role is 100% onsite in our Parlin, New Jersey facility.
We should not include Benefits section. Check for any boilerplate: we removed EEO, AI statement, etc. Also removed "Join our Talent Community", "Qnity is an equal opportunity employer", "If you need a reasonable accommodation", "We use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance our recruitment process." Also removed "How Base Pay is Determined:" paragraph (that's extra detail about pay determination; is that substantive? It explains how base pay is determined. Could be considered substantive but it's more generic. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The "How Base Pay is Determined:" paragraph is substantive but maybe considered filler? It's a description of their pay philosophy. Might be considered boilerplate but it's specific to Qnity. However, the instruction says to remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. This is not exactly those categories. It's about pay determination. Could be considered part of Pay section. But we already have pay range; the determination details might be extra. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Including that might be okay but could be considered thin. However, it's substantive info about how pay is determined. I'd lean to include it under Pay section as additional paragraph. But we must not create filler. It's not filler. So we can add a paragraph after the pay range. Thus Pay section:Pay
The pay range for this role is $111,580.00 - $175,340.00 Annual.
How Base