Jobs · Information Technology · Arizona

Investigator II

FDA · Nogales, AZ · 3 wk ago
Information TechnologyFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: Duties Summary? Actually the posting includes "Duties Summary" then "Requirements Qualifications". We need to use

for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. The posting has Duties Summary (which could be Responsibilities) and Requirements Qualifications (which could be Requirements and Qualifications). We need to preserve all substantive info, no boilerplate. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. There's some generic motivational text about HHS etc. That is substantive? It's about the department, maybe we keep as part of About the role? But we need to decide sections. We have content: - Duties Summary: includes description of authority, appointment, pay table, etc. Also includes description of position: serve under career appointment, paid under provisions, recruited based on Title 21 Pay Table 1, Band A (GS-11 equivalent). Also includes description of duties: investigations, inspections, etc. Also includes location: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), FDA, Office of Inspections and Investigations (OII), Office of Import Operations (OIO). Also description of OII. - Requirements Qualifications: includes basic qualification requirements, education/experience requirement with options, note about transcripts, etc. We need to output sections: maybe "Responsibilities" for duties summary, and "Requirements" and "Qualifications" maybe combined? The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have multiple headings. We should not repeat job title as heading. We should not include Job ID etc. We need to decide which headings to include based on content. We have duties/responsibilities content, we have requirements/qualifications content. There's no explicit Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Pay is mentioned: "paid under the provisions of this authority" and "Title 21 Pay Table 1, Band A (GS-11 equivalent)". That's some pay info but not specific salary. The instruction says: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state pay table and band, but not actual salary numbers. Is that enough to create a Pay section? It says "prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones". The pay info is minimal but present. Could include a Pay section with that info. However the instruction: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state pay table and band, so we could include a Pay section with that info. But we need to avoid filler like "commensurate with experience". This is specific: Title 21 Pay Table 1, Band A (GS-11 equivalent). That's substantive enough. Schedule: not mentioned. Benefits: not mentioned. Skills: not explicitly listed, but could infer from qualifications but better not to create Skills unless explicit. Thus we can have sections: Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Pay. Or combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? The instruction lists them separately, but we can have both if content exists. The posting lumps "Requirements Qualifications" together, but we can split: Requirements (maybe the basic qualification description) and Qualifications (education/experience). However the text includes both. To be safe, we can have a single section "Requirements" that includes both the basic qualification description and education/experience. Or we can have two: Requirements (basic qualification description) and Qualifications (education/experience). Let's do two sections: Requirements (the paragraph describing the Investigator job family) and Qualifications (the education/experience requirement). That seems logical. We also have an "About the role" maybe we could include a short paragraph about the position location and mission. But we already have duties summary includes location and mission. Could treat that as About the role. But we already have Responsibilities. The instruction says prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe we combine About the role and Responsibilities into one Responsibilities section. But we need to follow headings list; we can choose which to include. Let's decide: We'll include: -

Responsibilities

: contains duties summary content (including authority, appointment, pay table, duties, location, OII description). -

Requirements

: contains basic qualification requirements paragraph (the description of Investigator job family). -

Qualifications

: contains education/experience requirement options and note about transcripts. -

Pay

: contains pay table and band info. We must not include any boilerplate like "Become a part of the Department that touches the lives of every American..." That is motivational but maybe considered substantive? It's about HHS mission. Could be considered part of About the role but we didn't include About the role. Should we include it? It's not duties or requirements. It's more about the agency. Could be considered filler but it's substantive description of the agency. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we should keep that motivational paragraph as well. Where to put? Could be part of Responsibilities or a separate section like "About the role". Since we have no About the role section, we could add it to Responsibilities or create an About the role section. The instruction list includes About the role as an example heading. So we could add an About the role section containing that motivational paragraph and location/mission details. But we already have location/mission in duties summary. Might duplicate. Better to create About the role section containing the paragraph about HHS mission and the description of FDA and OII. Then Responsibilities section focusing on duties. However the instruction says prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Having both About the role and Responsibilities may be thin. But we have enough content for each. Let's see content: About the role paragraph: "Become a part of the Department that touches the lives of every American. At the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) you can give back to your community, state, and country, by making a difference in the lives of Americans everywhere! HHS is the principal agency for protecting the health of citizens. Join HHS and help to make our world healthier, safer, and better for all Americans. The Food and Drug Administration is the regulatory, scientific, public health, and consumer protection agency responsible for ensuring that all human and animal drugs, and medical devices are safe and effective, that cosmetics, foods, food additives, drugs and medicated feeds for food producing animals, and radiation emitting devices are safe, and that all such products marketed in the United States are adequately, truthfully and informatively labeled and safely and properly stored, transported, manufactured packaged and regulated. The position is located in the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Office of Inspections and Investigations (OII), Office of Import Operations (OIO). The Office of Inspections and Investigations (OII) is at the forefront of building a public health safety net for today's complex, global regulatory environment. OII professionals work in a range of program areas and locations, with 196 offices throughout the United States." That's substantive. Responsibilities: The duties summary includes: "This position is being filled under a stream-lined hiring authority, Title 21 of the United States Code (21 US Code 379d-3a) as amended by the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016, section 3072 and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, Section 3624. The candidate selected for this position will serve under a career or career-conditional appointment and be paid under the provisions of this authority. This position is being recruited based on the Title 21 Pay Table 1, Band A (GS-11 equivalent)." plus the duties description: "The position investigates and/or inspects FDA-regulated industry globally and evaluates compliance with U.S. laws and regulations in order to promote a culture of safety and quality with the objective of preventing unsafe, ineffective and/or defective products from becoming available to patients and consumers or used in clinical trials while facilitating appropriate development of novel products. FDA's enforcement of the laws and regulations protects patients and consumers from products that are impure, unsafe, ineffective, improperly or deceptively labeled or packaged, or in some other way dangerous or defective. Investigators routinely examine products; collect samples; conduct inspections of establishments that design, make, process, hold, or distribute FDA-regulated products; and otherwise gather information and evidence to document objectionable conditions and assess compliance with U.S. law and regulations. Investigators apply critical thinking to evaluate manufacturing processes, design practices, facility and material controls, supply chains, quality management systems, laboratory analyses, and clinical investigation programs to assess compliance with U.S. laws and regulations and to support advancements and innovations. Investigators continuously maintain required certification and credentials; provide internal and external stakeholder outreach, assistance, and education; and may mentor less experienced personnel." We could combine the authority/appointment/pay into Responsibilities as well. Requirements: The basic qualification requirements paragraph: "This Investigator job family covers professional positions that conduct inspections in FDA regulated industries and prepare and submit reports accompanied by supporting evidence documenting violations of the FD&C Act and other laws, regulations, and requirements administered by FDA." Actually that's more description of the job family, but it's under Basic Qualification Requirements. We'll keep that. Qualifications: Education/Experience Requirement options and note about transcripts. Pay: The pay table and band. We must not include any filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We must not include application instructions, EEO, etc. There's none. Now output HTML fragment: use

for each section heading, then content in

or

  • for lists. We need to decide where to use lists. The education/experience requirement has multiple options separated by "-OR-". Could be represented as a list. Also the list of fields (biochemistry, biology, etc.) is a long list; could be a list. Also the list of duties (examine products; collect samples; conduct inspections; etc.) could be a list. Also the list of things investigators apply critical thinking to evaluate (manufacturing processes, design practices, ...) could be a list. Also the list of things they continuously maintain etc. Could be list. We should preserve all substantive information; we can convert sentences with semicolons into list items for clarity but must not lose info. It's okay to reformat as
    • . The instruction: Use
      • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we should identify lists and convert. Let's extract lists: From Responsibilities: - Duties: "Investigators routinely examine products; collect samples; conduct inspections of establishments that design, make, process, hold, or distribute FDA-regulated products; and otherwise gather information and evidence to document objectionable conditions and assess compliance with U.S. law and regulations." That's a list of actions: examine products, collect samples, conduct inspections..., otherwise gather information... We can make
        • Examine products
        • Collect samples
        • Conduct inspections of establishments that design, make, process, hold, or distribute FDA-regulated products
        • Otherwise gather information and evidence to document objectionable conditions and assess compliance with U.S. law and regulations
        • - Critical thinking evaluation list: "Investigators apply critical thinking to evaluate manufacturing processes, design practices, facility and material controls, supply chains, quality management systems, laboratory analyses, and clinical investigation programs to assess compliance with U.S. laws and regulations and to support advancements and innovations." List items: manufacturing processes, design practices, facility and material controls, supply chains, quality management systems, laboratory analyses, clinical investigation programs. - Ongoing activities: "Investigators continuously maintain required certification and credentials; provide internal and external stakeholder outreach, assistance, and education; and may mentor less experienced personnel." List: maintain required certification and credentials, provide

Similar jobs

Investigator II

U.S. Center for SafeSportDenver, CO· 1 wk ago
Information Technology$86k–$95k/yrapply on secure7.saashr.com

Investigator II

FDAIndianapolis, IN· 3 wk ago
Managementapply on usajobs.gov

Investigator II

FDAMaitland, FL· 3 wk ago
Information Technologyapply on usajobs.gov