Graduate Engineer

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We have description: "Substation Graduate Engineer-P&C". The description includes responsibilities: list of duties. Requirements: maybe the bullet list under Requirements? Actually the posting has "Requirements" heading then bullet list of responsibilities? Let's parse: Job Type Full-time Description Substation Graduate Engineer-P&C Westwood Professional Services, Inc. The Substation Graduate Engineer – P&C role is an entry-level Electrical Engineer opportunity to work with a highly experienced and dynamic team of individuals dedicated to providing high-level professional services to our clients. Responsibilities (actually after description they list: "Responsible for protection and control design for utility-scale substations for power delivery, solar, and wind applications.Prepares reports, specifications, and drawing packages.Review and approve project submittals, RFIs and support field activities during construction.Provide professional and technical support to multiple Westwood projects.Day-to-day support and input to internal and external Project Managers." Then "Skills And Qualifications" heading then bullet list: Bachelor’s degree..., Familiar..., Working knowledge..., Effective..., Ability..., Ability..., Ability..., Ability..., Minimal travel possible. Then "For Preferred Consideration (Not Required)" list. Then "About Westwood Professional Services, Inc." description. We need to map to sections: About the role (maybe description of role), Responsibilities (list of duties), Requirements (maybe mandatory qualifications), Qualifications (maybe preferred?), Skills (maybe skills), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We have no explicit Benefits, Pay, Schedule info. So we should not include those sections. We need to include sections only if there is real specific content. Thus we will have:

About the role

... description ...

Responsibilities

• ... each duty ...

Requirements

• ... mandatory qualifications? The bullet list under Skills And Qualifications includes many items; some are mandatory? The posting says "Skills And Qualifications" heading then list. Could treat as Requirements. But we also have "For Preferred Consideration (Not Required)" separate. So we can split: Requirements = the list under Skills And Qualifications (maybe all are required). Qualifications = the preferred list? Or we could combine. The instruction: Use sections for Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide what goes where. We have content: Bachelor’s degree..., Familiar..., Working knowledge..., Effective..., Ability..., Ability..., Ability..., Ability..., Minimal travel possible. Those seem like requirements/qualifications/skills. Then "For Preferred Consideration (Not Required)" list: 1-2 years experience, EIT/FE certification, experience developing schematics, etc., AutoCAD/MicroStation. Thus we could map: - Requirements: Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from an ABET-accredited college. (maybe also minimal travel possible? but that's not a requirement). Could include the mandatory ones. - Qualifications: Familiar with applicable codes and standards (IEEE, ANSI, NESC). Working knowledge of MS Office (Word, Excel, etc.) a must. Effective verbal communication and technical writing skills. Ability to pay close attention to detail and check the quality of own and others’ work. Ability to use sound engineering judgment. Ability to manage time and workload effectively, which includes planning, organizing, and prioritizing with attention to details. Minimal travel possible. - Skills: maybe the same as qualifications? But we need distinct sections. Could treat Skills as the technical skills: Familiar with codes, Working knowledge of MS Office, Ability to use sound engineering judgment, Ability to manage time, etc. But that seems overlapping. Alternatively, we could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section, but instruction says prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe we just have About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (combining mandatory and preferred?), Skills (maybe the preferred?). But we need to avoid filler. Better: Use About the role (description), Responsibilities (list of duties), Requirements (mandatory: Bachelor’s degree, maybe minimal travel?), Qualifications (preferred: 1-2 years experience, EIT/FE, experience with schematics, AutoCAD/MicroStation). Skills could be omitted if not distinct. But we have also "Skills And Qualifications" heading before the list; that list includes both mandatory and skill-like items. The "For Preferred Consideration (Not Required)" is separate. Thus we could treat: - Requirements: Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from an ABET-accredited college. (maybe also minimal travel possible? but that's not a requirement, it's a condition.) - Qualifications: Familiar with applicable codes and standards (IEEE, ANSI, NESC). Working knowledge of MS Office (Word, Excel, etc.) a must. Effective verbal communication and technical writing skills. Ability to pay close attention to detail and check the quality of own and others’ work. Ability to use sound engineering judgment. Ability to manage time and workload effectively, which includes planning, organizing, and prioritizing with attention to details. - Skills: maybe the preferred list? But that's more experience/certifications. Alternatively, we could make Skills section for the preferred list (1-2 years experience, EIT/FE, experience developing schematics, experience completing calculations, experience developing specifications, AutoCAD and MicroStation drafting). That seems like skills/experience. Thus we have four sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. That's many but each substantive. We must not include Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Now we need to extract exact text preserving all substantive information, not inventing or summarizing. Let's copy the description text: "The Substation Graduate Engineer – P&C role is an entry-level Electrical Engineer opportunity to work with a highly experienced and dynamic team of individuals dedicated to providing high-level professional services to our clients." That's the only prose about role. Responsibilities list: each sentence separated by periods but no bullet. We need to split into list items: - Responsible for protection and control design for utility-scale substations for power delivery, solar, and wind applications. - Prepares reports, specifications, and drawing packages. - Review and approve project submittals, RFIs and support field activities during construction. - Provide professional and technical support to multiple Westwood projects. - Day-to-day support and input to internal and external Project Managers. Note: The original text: "Responsible for protection and control design for utility-scale substations for power delivery, solar, and wind applications.Prepares reports, specifications, and drawing packages.Review and approve project submittals, RFIs and support field activities during construction.Provide professional and technical support to multiple Westwood projects.Day-to-day support and input to internal and external Project Managers." We need to add spaces after periods for readability but not required. We'll keep as separate items. Now Requirements: Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from an ABET-accredited college. Maybe also "Minimal travel possible." but that's not a requirement; it's a condition. Could be included under Requirements? It's more like a job condition. Might be better to put under Requirements as a bullet? But it's not a requirement; it's a note about travel. Could be omitted? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep "Minimal travel possible." somewhere. Where does it belong? It appears after the list under Skills And Qualifications. It could be considered a skill/requirement? It's a job condition. Could be placed under Requirements as a bullet. But we have many sections; maybe we put it under Requirements as a bullet. Now Qualifications: the list under Skills And Qualifications (excluding the degree and minimal travel?). Actually the list includes: - Familiar with applicable codes and standards (IEEE, ANSI, NESC). - Working knowledge of MS Office (Word, Excel, etc.) a must. - Effective verbal communication and technical writing skills. - Ability to pay close attention to detail and check the quality of own and others’ work. - Ability to use sound engineering judgment. - Ability to manage time and workload effectively, which includes planning, organizing, and prioritizing with attention to details. - Minimal travel possible. But we already used degree and maybe minimal travel. Let's decide: We'll treat Requirements as degree only. Qualifications as the rest of that list (including minimal travel). Skills as the preferred list. Now Preferred list (For Preferred Consideration (Not Required)): - 1-2 years of relevant experience - EIT/FE certification or the ability to obtain certification within one year is preferred. - Experience developing one lines, three lines, AC schematics, DC schematics, alarm schematics, communication schematics, wiring diagrams, and associated cable schedule preferred. - Experience completing AC and DC load, voltage drop, and conduit fill calculations preferred. - Experience developing equipment and construction specifications a plus. - AutoCAD and MicroStation drafting experience a plus. We need to keep the exact phrasing. Now About Westwood: we have a paragraph about the company. That could be placed under About the role? Actually About the role is about the role, not company. The company description could be placed under About the role? But we already have About the role description. The company description is separate; maybe we could include it under About the role as additional context? But the instruction: About the role section heading for e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, etc. So About the role should describe the role, not the company. The company description is not about the role; it's about the employer. There's no specific section for company info; we could omit it? But we must preserve ALL substantive information. So we need to include it somewhere. Could we add a section like "About Westwood"? Not in allowed headings list. The allowed headings are only those listed: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we cannot add a custom heading. We could incorporate the company description into About the role section as extra prose? That would be mixing role description with company info, but it's still substantive and not inventing. The instruction: Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says e.g., meaning those are examples; maybe we can use other headings? It says "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests those are the allowed headings; we should stick to them. So we need to fit company info into one of those sections. Probably About the role can include both role description and company overview. That seems acceptable. Thus About the role will contain two paragraphs: first the role description, second the company description. Now we need to ensure we don't repeat job title as heading. We'll not. Now produce HTML fragment:

  About the role

  The Substation Graduate Engineer – P&C role is an entry-level Electrical Engineer opportunity to work with a highly experienced and dynamic team of individuals dedicated to providing high-level professional services to our clients.

  At Westwood, our purpose is to create a better world for people through our work. We transform the energy grid, design resilient infrastructure, and develop communities that will flourish today and for future generations. With over 50 years of experience and a legacy of innovation, we stand at the forefront of our industry, dedicated to understanding the unique needs of the markets we serve. Our approach revolves around people. We are committed to building a culture that attracts, retains, and develops high performers. Our team values relationships, innovation, dedication, initiative, and growth. We believe fostering a collaborative “One Team” mentality yields superior outcomes in everything we do. We customize our technical capabilities and geographic reach to meet our clients where they are and help them realize their vision. We are partners in our clients’ success, driving to provide solutions that make a lasting difference. Safety, sustainability, and operational