Full Time - Merchandising Service Associate - Day

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also must not include sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting actually states them. Let's parse the posting. Content: - Intro: "Your Impact at Lowe's As a Lowe's Merchandising Services Associate, you are a key connection point between Merchandising and Store Operations, allowing us to deliver a great shopping experience in every Lowe's store. If you want to build eye-catching displays and implement strategies that showcase in-demand products, you'll enjoy working with our Merchandising Services Team." - "How We Support You Whether you need a part-time position or a place to plant yourself and grow, Lowe's is ready to support your goals. As a Lowe's associate, you'll gain access to many benefits beyond competitive pay and flexible schedules. Keep your weekends free with a set weekday schedule. *Make your well-being a priority with multiple top-tier health insurance options. Explore educational opportunities with Lowe's tuition assistance program. Take charge of your financial future with a company-matching 401(k) and optional Employee Stock Purchase Program. Gain extra savings with a 10% Associate Discount. Learn new trade skills with our Track to the Trades program. For information about our benefit programs and eligibility, please visit https://talent.lowes.com/us/en/benefits. Live Nursery MST Associates may be required to work weekend shifts." - "Your Day at Lowe's As a Merchandising Services Associate, you ensure our store's signage, pricing information, and displays are accurate so merchandise is easy to locate. You create product displays that are safe, clean, visually appealing, and easy for customers to access. While most of your time will be spent on activities that don't involve customer interaction, you may be expected to engage with customers when the opportunity arises. You'll be expected to listen to customers and answer questions, communicate product or warranty information, and assist in locating or handling merchandise." - "Key Responsibilities" list bullet points. - "Minimum Qualifications" list. - "Preferred Qualifications" list. - "Lowe's commitment to growth and teamwork extends to the community as well. To better equip our stores and serve our communities, we strongly encourage bilingual, military, and veteran talent to apply and join our team." - "Travel Requirements" paragraph. - "Working Conditions" paragraph. - "About Lowe's" paragraph (two versions duplicated with slight differences). Need to preserve substantive info, but remove duplicated lines. There's duplication: first About Lowe's paragraph (FORTUNE® 50, FY2023 sales $86B, 1,700 stores, 300k associates, based in Mooresville, NC). Then second About Lowe's paragraph (FORTUNE® 100, FY2025 sales $86B, 300k associates, 1,700 stores, 530 branches, 130 distribution centers, etc). They are similar but with different numbers (FY2023 vs FY2025, FORTUNE 50 vs 100, extra details). We need to preserve ALL substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. So we should combine both? But we must not duplicate lines. We can merge unique info: mention both FY2023 and FY2025? Actually they conflict: one says FY2023 sales >$86B, the other says FY2025 sales >$86B. Both could be true (maybe they updated). We should keep both statements? But they are similar; we could keep both as separate sentences but avoid duplication. The duplication is the sentence about serving approx 16 million customer transactions a week appears in both. Also the statement about based in Mooresville, N.C., Lowe's supports the communities... appears in both with slight variations. We need to preserve all substantive info, but we can combine to avoid repeating same sentence. Let's extract unique facts: From first About Lowe's: - Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) is a FORTUNE® 50 home improvement company. - Serving approximately 16 million customer transactions a week in the United States. - Total fiscal year 2023 sales of more than $86 billion. - Operates over 1,700 home improvement stores. - Employs approximately 300,000 associates. - Based in Mooresville, N.C. - Supports communities through programs focused on creating safe, affordable housing and helping to develop the next generation of skilled trade experts. - For more information, visit Lowes.com. From second About Lowe's: - Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) is a FORTUNE® 100 home improvement company. - Serving approximately 16 million customer transactions a week (same). - Total fiscal year 2025 sales of more than $86 billion. - Employs approximately 300,000 associates. - Operates over 1,700 home improvement stores, 530 branches and 130 distribution centers. - Based in Mooresville, N.C. - Supports communities through programs focused on creating safe, affordable housing, improving community spaces, helping to develop the next generation of skilled trade experts and providing disaster relief to communities in need. - For more information, visit Lowes.com. Thus we can combine: mention both FORTUNE® 50 and FORTUNE® 100? Actually they conflict; but we can note both? Might be inaccurate to say both. However we must preserve all substantive info; we cannot discard either. Could present as: Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) is a FORTUNE® 50 home improvement company (also noted as FORTUNE® 100 in later reporting). But that's interpretation. Better to keep both statements as separate sentences, acknowledging the discrepancy? The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we must keep both statements exactly as they appear, but we can avoid duplicating the identical sentences. So we can include both versions but ensure we don't repeat identical sentences. Let's list unique sentences: Sentence set A: 1. Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) is a FORTUNE® 50 home improvement company serving approximately 16 million customer transactions a week in the United States. 2. With total fiscal year 2023 sales of more than $86 billion, Lowe's operates over 1,700 home improvement stores and employs approximately 300,000 associates. 3. Based in Mooresville, N.C., Lowe's supports the communities it serves through programs focused on creating safe, affordable housing and helping to develop the next generation of skilled trade experts. 4. For more information, visit Lowes.com. Sentence set B: 1. Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) is a FORTUNE® 100 home improvement company serving approximately 16 million customer transactions a week, with total fiscal year 2025 sales of more than $86 billion. 2. Lowe's employs approximately 300,000 associates and operates over 1,700 home improvement stores, 530 branches and 130 distribution centers. 3. Based in Mooresville, N.C., Lowe's supports the communities it serves through programs focused on creating safe, affordable housing, improving community spaces, helping to develop the next generation of skilled trade experts and providing disaster relief to communities in need. 4. For more information, visit Lowes.com. We see duplication: "serving approximately 16 million customer transactions a week" appears in both; "Based in Mooresville, N.C., Lowe's supports the communities it serves through programs..." appears but with different details; "For more information, visit Lowes.com." appears in both. We can keep one instance of each duplicated sentence, but we need to preserve the unique modifiers. For the serving sentence, we could keep one that includes both year references? Actually the first includes "in the United States" and the second does not have "in the United States". The second includes a comma after week and then "with total fiscal year 2025 sales...". We could combine: "Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) is a FORTUNE® 50 home improvement company serving approximately 16 million customer transactions a week in the United States; with total fiscal year 2023 sales of more than $86 billion." and then also mention FORTUNE® 100 and FY2025? That's adding interpretation. Safer: keep both sentences but modify to avoid exact duplication: we can keep both but change wording slightly? That would be inventing. Better to keep both sentences as they are, even if they share a phrase; the instruction says do not duplicate lines. Duplicated lines means identical lines. If we keep both sentences, they are not identical because one includes "in the United States" and the other does not, and the second includes "with total fiscal year 2025 sales..." after the week phrase. So they are not identical lines. So we can keep both as separate sentences. Similarly for the "Based in Mooresville..." sentences: they differ in the list of community programs. So they are not identical. So we can keep both. For "For more information, visit Lowes.com." they are identical. We should keep only one instance. Thus About Lowe's section will contain multiple paragraphs (or sentences) but we can wrap in

. Now other sections: - "How We Support You" includes benefits info: health insurance, tuition assistance, 401(k), Employee Stock Purchase Program, 10% Associate Discount, Track to the Trades program, set weekday schedule (keep weekends free). Also mention "Live Nursery MST Associates may be required to work weekend shifts." This is a schedule detail. Thus we can create a Benefits section (

Benefits

) with

• for each benefit. Also we could include Schedule info? The posting mentions "Keep your weekends free with a set weekday schedule." and "Live Nursery MST Associates may be required to work weekend shifts." That's schedule info. So we could create a Schedule section (

  Schedule

  ) with that info. Pay: The posting mentions "competitive pay" but no specific numbers. Also "Starting rate of pay may vary based on factors including, but not limited to, position offered, location, education, training, and/or experience." That's not a specific pay figure. According to rules, we should not create Pay section unless posting actually states them (specific pay). Since no specific pay, we should omit Pay section. Now Responsibilities: we have "Key Responsibilities" list. We'll make

  Responsibilities

  with
  . Requirements: we have Minimum Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications. Could combine into Requirements section? The rules: use headings for Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We have both Minimum and Preferred Qualifications. Could put them under Requirements (or Qualifications). Since we have both, we could make a

  Requirements

  containing Minimum Qualifications, and a

  Preferred Qualifications

  for preferred. Or we could combine into Qualifications. The instruction: "Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we can have both Requirements and Qualifications sections. Let's decide: Minimum