Field Engineer (Summer 2027)

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually we need to use headings for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, remove boilerplate (About Us? Actually "About Us" is not a required heading; we can maybe include as a paragraph? The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should create sections for those headings if content exists. The posting includes "About Us" paragraph at top. That could be considered "About the role"? Actually "About Us" is company overview, not role. But we could treat as "About the role"? The instruction says use those headings as examples; we can also use other headings? It says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Likely they expect those specific headings. We should map content to those. We have: - Job Summary: description of role. Could go under "About the role". - Essential Functions and Responsibilities: list of duties. That's Responsibilities. - Required Qualifications and Education Requirements: that's Qualifications (maybe also Requirements). Could split: Requirements (maybe required qualifications) and Qualifications (preferred?). But we have both Required Qualifications and Preferred Skills. So we can have "Requirements" for required qualifications, "Qualifications" for preferred? Actually they said "Requirements, Qualifications". Might be ambiguous. We'll put required under "Requirements" and preferred under "Qualifications" or "Skills". We have "Preferred Skills" section. So we can put that under "Skills". Also we have "Pay Transparency" with base compensation range and benefits. So we have Pay and Benefits sections. - Work Environment, Physical Demands, Other Duties, etc. Those could be omitted if not matching headings; but we need to preserve all substantive info. We could include them under appropriate sections like Responsibilities or maybe a new heading? But instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could incorporate those details into Responsibilities or maybe a "Work Environment" heading not in list? But they said use those headings (e.g...). It doesn't forbid other headings, but they gave examples. Safer to stick to those headings and put extra info under appropriate ones (e.g., Work Environment under Responsibilities or maybe a new "Work Environment" heading if we think it's substantive). However they said "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So we can add a heading like "Work Environment" if we have content. But they didn't list it as example; but they didn't forbid. However they said use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not exhaustive. So we can add other headings if needed. Thus we can create sections: - About the role (Job Summary) - Responsibilities (Essential Functions and Responsibilities) - Requirements (Required Qualifications and Education Requirements) - Qualifications (maybe Preferred Skills? Actually they'd be Skills. But we have Preferred Skills separate. Could treat Qualifications as preferred qualifications? Might be confusing. Let's do: Requirements = required qualifications; Skills = preferred skills; Qualifications = maybe education? But we already used education in Requirements. Hmm. Better: Use Requirements for required qualifications (degree, experience). Use Qualifications for preferred qualifications (EIT, internship). Use Skills for preferred skills (knowledge, software, communication, physical). That seems logical. - Benefits (benefits package) - Pay (base compensation range) - Schedule? Not mentioned; no schedule info. So omit Schedule. - Work Environment (maybe as its own section) but we could incorporate into Responsibilities or a separate "Work Environment". Since we have details about work environment, physical demands, travel, etc. Could be its own section. We must not include boilerplate like "Reasonable accommodations..." etc. That's part of Responsibilities? It's a statement about accommodations; we can keep it as part of Responsibilities maybe. We must remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The posting includes "Reasonable accommodations or workable solutions may be made..." that's not boilerplate; it's part of essential functions. Keep. Also "Other Areas of Accountability" includes many items; we can keep under Responsibilities. We must preserve all substantive info; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep the details but can format as lists. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. We'll produce something like:

About the role

Field Engineer plays a critical role in assisting engineers and technicians with project duties in the field. This position is responsible for supporting engineering projects, performing laboratory testing, and conducting field observation of construction materials, ensuring accurate data collection and reliable project outcomes. The ideal candidate will demonstrate adaptability, technical expertise, and a collaborative mindset, and contribute to the AET’s mission of delivering high-quality services. We are seeking motivated individuals pursuing education or careers in Civil Engineering, Geology, Geological Engineering or related fields for Field Engineers across several of our locations and departments. At AET, we value individuals who are client-focused, impactful, and decisive.

Responsibilities

• Conduct geotechnical field testing according to QA procedures.
• Perform special inspection services materials testing or environmental services on an as needed basis.
• Perform soil boring layout/documentation, utility clearance meets and surveying.
• Assist in training of less experienced personnel in routine field work/documentation.
• Conduct soil laboratory tests according to QA procedures.
• Log/classify soil samples in laboratory or fieldwork, as needed.
• Prepare reports of field and laboratory work.
• Prepare detailed site visit reports for job file using standard AET forms.
• Communicate with clients to determine their project needs.
• Complete tasks in accordance with project quality requirements.
• Assist in maintaining and improving the materials testing laboratory in the local office.
• Assist with geotechnical engineering investigations including field drilling and laboratory testing, geotechnical engineering analyses and report preparation.
• Conduct field, laboratory and office activities in a manner consistent with federal, state, and local regulations, along with AET’s QA and Health and Safety Policies, to promote the safety and protection of employees, clients and the public.
• Maintain valid driver’s license and acceptable driving record.
• Some positions may require use of personal vehicle for company business.
• Maintain compliance with DOT driver regulations if required for position.
• Maintain appropriate physicals if required for position.
• Some duties outdoors or away from main office/laboratory location.
• Frequent travel required within regional area.
• Occasional out-of-town travel.
• Properly use and maintain company instruments and equipment.
• Establish, maintain, and build business relationships with clients.
• Aid in company marketing functions.
• Maintain high chargeable productivity.
• Coordinate with other AET staff with the ultimate goal of increasing efficiency, productivity, and communication.
• Perform other tasks as necessary to meet departmental or company goals.

Requirements

• Bachelor’s degree in Civil, Geological, or related Engineering field.
• 0-3 years of experience in an engineering or science related field.

Qualifications

• Engineer in Training (EIT) and ability to achieve professional registration (PE) preferred.
• Internship or previous work experience preferred, but not mandatory.

Skills

• Knowledge of fundamental engineering or scientific principles within specialty area and ability to apply that knowledge to the job.
• Experience using personal computer software, especially Microsoft Office.
• Ability to work at environmental remediation, industrial and construction sites and perform field work including, but not limited to, collecting samples, operating field instruments, following procedures, planning, organizing and arranging logistics for the job, and documenting field activities and data collected.
• Communication skills sufficient to convey complex technical information in a clear manner to diverse audiences.
• Ability to interact effectively with a wide variety of people, work effectively within project teams, resolve issues and problems in a constructive manner, and work independently in the field.
• Capable of the physical labor required, with personal protective equipment.
• Ability to occasionally move 50 to 100 pounds.
• Ability to perform hand auger borings and field testing throughout the working day.

Benefits

• Health benefits
• Insurance
• Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
• Long term savings
• Paid time off
• Professional development opportunities

Pay

Base compensation is expected to be in the range of $28.00 – $31.00 per hour based on skill set and experience.

We should also include Work Environment? Not required but we have details about work environment, physical demands, travel. Could incorporate into Responsibilities already (we have many items). We already included travel, outdoors, etc. So we covered. We must not include "About Us" paragraph separate; we incorporated into About the role. Check for any duplicated lines: we have not repeated. Check for boilerplate: we removed "Reasonable accommodations or workable solutions may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform essential functions." Actually we didn't include that line. It's in the original under Essential Functions and Responsibilities heading. Should we keep it? It's a statement about accommodations; it's substantive? It's a policy statement. Might be considered boilerplate? It's not cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning. It's about accommodations. I'd keep it. We could add as a list item under Responsibilities: "Reasonable accommodations or workable solutions may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform essential functions." Let's add. Also we missed "Other Duties Please note this job description is not designed to cover or contain a comprehensive listing of activities, duties, or responsibilities that are required of the employee for this job. Duties, responsibilities, and activities may change at any time with or without notice." That's a disclaimer; could be considered boilerplate? It's a standard disclaimer. Might be considered legal boilerplate. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is a legal disclaimer about job description not comprehensive. Likely considered legal boilerplate; we should remove. Also "Third Party Disclosure Notice to Third Party Agencies: AET does not accept unsolicited resumes from third party recruiting firms. Absent a signed Service Agreement by AET’s Chief People Officer (CPO), AET reserves the right to pursue and hire these candidates without financial obligation to recruiters or agencies." That's legal boilerplate; remove. Also "Work Environment This job primarily operates primary in a field environment in outdoor conditions, on construction sites with uneven ground and adverse weather conditions. This role secondary operates in an office