Faculty Associate - General Pool - School of Humanities, Arts and Cultural Studies

The user wants me to reformat this job posting into clean semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and structure it according to the rules. First, I need to identify the sections: - About the role (position description) - About the School (SHArCS) - About the New College - About Arizona State University - Essential Functions / Responsibilities - Qualifications (Required and Desired) - Application Instructions (but I should remove application instructions per rules) The rules say: remove application instructions, cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. Also: do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it). The job title appears to be "Faculty Associate" positions for various disciplines. Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it. There's "Open Date Oct 15, 2026" and location info. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The posting mentions "Salary is based on qualifications and assigned teaching load." and "non-benefits-eligible". That's specific enough for Pay and Benefits? Let's see: "Salary is based on qualifications and assigned teaching load." That's a pay statement. "non-benefits-eligible" is a benefits statement. But the rules say never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state them, but they are minimal. However, the rules also say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe I should include them if they have real content. But "Salary is based on qualifications and assigned teaching load." is a single sentence. "non-benefits-eligible" is a phrase. Could fold into a short

  under About the role. Also, there's a list of disciplines: American Studies, English, etc. That's part of the position description. Let me structure: 1. About the role (position description) - includes the hiring pool info, FTE, salary basis, list of disciplines. 2. About the School (SHArCS) 3. About the New College 4. About Arizona State University 5. Responsibilities (Essential Functions) 6. Qualifications (Required and Desired) I should not include Application Instructions, Application Deadline, Application Procedure, etc. Also, the "Open Date Oct 15, 2026" and location "West Valley campus" are metadata. Fold into a short

  at top maybe. The job title is not to be repeated as heading. The page already shows it. So I'll start with a

  for metadata. Now, write HTML fragment. Let's draft:

  Location: West Valley campus. Open date: October 15, 2026.

  About the role

  The School of Humanities, Arts and Cultural Studies seeks part-time, non-tenure track faculty associates for a hiring pool. Faculty Associate positions are one semester, non-benefits-eligible, fixed-term appointments with no tenure implications, not to exceed an average of .40 FTE per semester. The number of courses is contingent upon unit needs, funding, and sufficient enrollment. Salary is based on qualifications and assigned teaching load.

  Disciplines included in this hiring pool:

  • American Studies
  • English (composition, ESL, linguistics, literature, or rhetoric)
  • Ethnicity, Race, and Indigenous Studies
  • History
  • Interdisciplinary Arts and Performance (IAP)
  • Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences (IAS)
  • Health Humanities
  • Philosophy and Ethics
  • Religious Studies
  • Spanish Language
  • Women and Gender Studies

  About the School of Humanities, Arts and Cultural Studies

  The School of Humanities, Arts and Cultural Studies (SHArCS) at the New College invites students to think critically about the human experience and communicate effectively while working within, outside, and across the boundaries of traditional liberal arts disciplines. At SHArCS, our goal is to develop thoughtful leaders who use critical and creative thinking to solve problems and find ways to make the world a better place.

  https://newcollege.asu.edu/sharcs

  About the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences

  At ASU’s New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, we take pride in breaking down disciplinary barriers, cultivating an environment where innovative research flourishes. Our faculty are not just educators; they are trailblazers in their fields, consistently expanding the frontiers of knowledge. We invite you to join this dynamic community, where you will lead and engage in pioneering projects that redefine academic excellence. Our interdisciplinary approach offers you unparalleled opportunities for personal and professional growth. By joining our faculty, you’re not just advancing your career; you’re shaping the future of education and research in meaningful ways. You’ll be empowered to innovate and address complex global challenges, all while preparing the next generation of leaders. We are committed to supporting and guiding you throughout your academic journey, ensuring that your contributions are impactful and transformative.

  New College is located on ASU’s West Valley campus, blending a liberal arts and science education with 21st-century workforce preparation and a learning hub for students of all ages and backgrounds supporting the rapid growth of its surrounding 14 communities. Integrating modern amenities with the natural beauty of outdoor spaces, the West Valley campus offers over 125 undergraduate and graduate degree programs across business, engineering, education, and the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences.

  https://newcollege.asu.edu/

  About Arizona State University

  Arizona State University, ranked the No. 1 “Most Innovative School” in the nation by U.S. News & World Report for twelve years in succession, has forged the model for a New American University. Year after year, ASU ranks at or near the top of the list in areas that matter. ASU is a comprehensive public research institution, measured not by whom it excludes, but by whom it includes and how they succeed; advancing research and discovery of public value; and assuming fundamental responsibility for the economic, social, cultural and overall health of the communities it serves. ASU operates on the principles that learning is a personal and original journey for each student; that they thrive on experience and that the process of discovery cannot be bound by traditional academic disciplines. Through innovation and a commitment to accessibility, ASU has drawn pioneering researchers to its faculty even as it expands opportunities for qualified students, attracting some of the highest-quality students from all 50 states and more than 130 nations.

  All we do at ASU is guided and inspired by the ASU Charter, which reads: ASU is a comprehensive public research university, measured not by whom it excludes, but by whom it includes and how they succeed; advancing research and discovery of public value; and assuming fundamental responsibility for the economic, social, cultural and overall health of the communities it serves. Successful candidates will demonstrate throughout their materials how their teaching will contribute to the fulfillment of this charter.

  http://www.asu.edu

  Responsibilities

  • Teach upper and/or lower-division courses to undergraduate students, in face-to-face, hybrid, or online formats.
  • Prepare syllabus, lectures and class materials, exams, and grade assignments and exams.
  • Maintain regular availability to students including office hours as appropriate to course modality.
  • Monitor student success and regularly respond to student academic issues.
  • Spanish Language Faculty Associates: Applicants should have experience in teaching core oral proficiency courses that build foundational knowledge while focusing on conversational skills. This rigorous training will prepare students for the American Council of Teachers of Foreign Language oral proficiency exam.

  Qualifications

  Required

  • Master’s degree in the field of discipline teaching or related field at the time of hire.

  Desired

  • Demonstrated commitment to working successfully with students from a wide variety of socio-economic and cultural backgrounds, including first-generation college students.
  • Record of scholarly publication or, if applicable, theatre, performance, and/or art show experience.
  • Expertise in developing and teaching courses online and in person.
  • Evidence of teaching excellence (e.g., student evaluations, syllabi, peer observation, annual evaluations, teaching philosophy, etc.).
  • Experience with online delivery platforms such as Canvas or equivalent.
  Note: The rules say use

  for section headings. Should I use

  for subsections? The rules only mention

  for section headings. It says "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid

  for sub-sections. But to be safe, maybe keep all top-level sections as

  and use

  for subsections? The example includes "Requirements, Qualifications" as separate. Here we have Required and Desired under Qualifications. Could make them separate

  headings: "Required Qualifications" and "Desired Qualifications". But the rules say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe keep Qualifications as one section with two sub-lists. However, the rules say use

  for section headings. It doesn't say we cannot use

  . I think using

  is fine for subsections. But the output should be a fragment, not a full document. I'll use

  for main sections and

  for subsections. Alternatively, I could make "Required Qualifications" and "Desired Qualifications" as separate

  sections. That might be more consistent with the examples. Let's see: The example list includes "Requirements, Qualifications" as separate. So they might expect separate headings. But the posting has "Required Qualifications" and "Desired Qualifications" under "Qualifications". I'll make them separate

  sections: "Required Qualifications" and "Desired Qualifications". That would be more semantic. But the rules: "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It lists both Requirements and Qualifications as examples. So they are separate. In this posting, there is "Required Qualifications" and "Desired Qualifications". I'll treat them as two sections: "Required Qualifications" and "Desired Qualifications". However, the heading "Qualifications" is also a section. I'll do:

  Required Qualifications

  ...

  Desired Qualifications

  ...
  But then I lose the grouping. The rules say "Preserve ALL substantive information". Grouping is not substantive. I think separate headings are fine. Let