Engineering Test Technician

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We need to parse the job description. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. We need to preserve all substantive information. We need to decide sections. Content includes: - Job Description Summary: description of role, location, purpose. - Job Description: details of tasks. - Key Responsibilities: list. - Basic Qualifications: list. - Desired Qualifications: list. - Ideal Candidate: paragraph. - Why GE Aerospace: paragraph about mission, export-controlled info. - Additional Information: mentions work environment, professional development, compensation, EEO, legal auth, drug screen, relocation assistance (none). Also mentions "GE Aerospace offers a great work environment, professional development, challenging careers, and competitive compensation." That's benefits-ish. We need to map to sections: About the role (maybe summary), Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities), Requirements (Basic Qualifications), Qualifications (Desired Qualifications?), Skills (maybe combine desired?), Benefits (maybe from Additional Information about work environment, professional development, compensation), Pay (not specified, so we should NOT include Pay section because no specific pay), Schedule (not specified, so omit). Also maybe include "Why GE Aerospace" as part of About the role or separate? Could be "About the role" includes summary and why GE Aerospace? But we need to follow instruction: use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can choose which to include. We must not create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". So we must only include sections where we have real content. Thus: -

About the role

: include summary paragraph(s) about role, location, purpose, maybe also Why GE Aerospace? Could combine but better to keep separate: maybe "About the role" includes the job description summary and the "Why GE Aerospace" paragraph? But "Why GE Aerospace" is more about company; could be part of About the role. However we could also add a separate section like "About GE Aerospace" but not in allowed headings. So we incorporate into About the role. -

Responsibilities

: list from Key Responsibilities. -

Requirements

: Basic Qualifications. -

Qualifications

: Desired Qualifications. -

Skills

: maybe combine some skill statements from Ideal Candidate or Desired Qualifications? But we already have Qualifications; Skills could be separate for skills like soldering, JTAG, etc. However we might avoid duplication. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe we combine Skills into Qualifications or Responsibilities. But we need to follow allowed headings; we can omit Skills if not needed. But we have content for skills: soldering, troubleshooting, test equipment, JTAG, etc. Could be placed under Responsibilities or Qualifications. Probably better to have a Skills section to avoid duplication? But we can incorporate into Qualifications (Desired Qualifications) as they are skills. However Desired Qualifications already includes many skill-like items. So we could have Qualifications section covering both basic and desired? But we have separate Basic and Desired; we could merge into Requirements and Qualifications. That seems fine. Thus we will have: - About the role (summary + Why GE Aerospace maybe) - Responsibilities - Requirements (Basic Qualifications) - Qualifications (Desired Qualifications) - Benefits (from Additional Information: work environment, professional development, challenging careers, competitive compensation). Also maybe mention relocation assistance? It says No, but we shouldn't include filler like "No". We could mention that relocation assistance is not provided, but that's filler? It's specific: "Relocation Assistance Provided: No". That's substantive? It's a specific statement. Could include but it's a negative. Might be okay but it's not a benefit. Probably we can omit because it's not a benefit. The Benefits section should only be included if posting actually states them. It does state "great work environment, professional development, challenging careers, and competitive compensation." That's benefits. So we include Benefits. - Pay: not specified, omit. - Schedule: not specified, omit. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, equal opportunity, legal auth, drug screen, etc. Those are boilerplate/legal; we must remove them. However the instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. So we need to strip those lines. That includes statements about Equal Opportunity Employer, legal authorization, drug screen, export-controlled info? The export-controlled info is part of role requirements (must be US person). That is substantive? It's a requirement for the role due to export control. Might be considered legal but it's a job requirement. The instruction says remove legal boilerplate, but the export-control requirement is likely a job requirement, not boilerplate. However the text includes: "This role requires access to U.S. export-controlled information. Therefore, employment will be contingent upon the ability to prove that you meet the status of a U.S. Person as one of the following: U.S. lawful permanent resident, U.S. Citizen, have been granted asylee or refugee status..." This is a requirement; we should keep it under Requirements perhaps. But the Additional Information also includes: "GE Aerospace is an Equal Opportunity Employer..." that's boilerplate, remove. Also "Employment decisions are made without regard to..." remove. Also "GE Aerospace will only employ those who are legally authorized to work in the United States for this opening." That's also legal boilerplate; remove. Also "Any offer of employment is conditioned upon the successful completion of a drug screen (as applicable). Employees may also be subject to random and reasonable-suspicion drug and alcohol testing." That's boilerplate; remove. Thus we need to keep substantive info: role summary, responsibilities, basic qualifications, desired qualifications, ideal candidate paragraph, why GE Aerospace (mission), benefits (work environment, professional development, challenging careers, competitive compensation). Also maybe mention location: Grand Rapids, Michigan. We must not repeat job title as heading. Now produce HTML fragment. Structure:

About the role

GE Aerospace is seeking a skilled, hands-on Engineering Test Technician to join our engineering laboratory team in Grand Rapids, Michigan. This role supports the testing, troubleshooting, repair, and validation of aerospace electronic products and test equipment. You will work closely with design engineering teams to resolve hardware issues, verify performance against drawings and specifications, and help ensure reliable, high-quality products for aerospace applications. At GE Aerospace, we invent the future of flight, lift people up, and bring them home safely. Our engineering teams solve complex aerospace challenges through technical excellence, collaboration, disciplined execution, and continuous improvement.

Responsibilities

• Perform functional, diagnostic, and verification testing on electronic products, CCAs, and complete units against engineering drawings, specifications, and test procedures.
• Troubleshoot and debug analog, digital, and microprocessor-based circuits at the component, board, unit, and test-station levels.
• Perform soldering, desoldering, assembly, disassembly, modification, and repair of electronic hardware and test equipment; maintain applicable solder certification.
• Conduct component testing and evaluation on electrical devices while meeting defined schedule and budget requirements.
• Build, check out, set up, calibrate, and maintain test equipment, fixtures, and test stations.
• Partner with design engineers to identify root causes, resolve failures, validate corrective actions, and improve product quality.
• Use Windows-based tools and lower-level programming interfaces as needed; JTAG programming experience is beneficial.
• Support lab computer, network, and IT security setup activities as required.
• Document test results, failures, repairs, and technical findings accurately and clearly.
• Follow applicable safety, quality, compliance, and export-control requirements.

Requirements

• Associate degree in Electrical Engineering/Electronics Technology, an Electronic Technician certificate, or a high school diploma/GED with at least 5 years of related electronics testing experience or relevant military experience.
• 3-5 years of hands-on experience in an engineering lab, electronics test, product test, avionics, military electronics, or similar technical environment.
• Demonstrated experience testing and troubleshooting analog, digital, and microprocessor-based electronic circuits.
• Hands-on soldering, rework, and electronic assembly/disassembly experience.
• Experience performing product test and debug at the circuit board/CCA and/or complete-unit level.
• Experience in at least two of the following areas:
  • Test equipment build, checkout, setup, or calibration
  • Windows software and lower-level programming
  • JTAG programming
  • Computer and network setup
  • IT security in a lab or test environment
• Must be legally authorized to work in the United States.
• Must qualify as a U.S. person under applicable export-control regulations (U.S. lawful permanent resident, U.S. Citizen, asylee or refugee status).
• Ability to successfully complete a pre-employment drug screen, if applicable.

Qualifications

• Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering or a related technical discipline.
• Experience with JTAG programming and hardware programming/debug tools.
• Experience performing Destructive Physical Analysis (DPA).
• Exposure to materials science, chemistry, mechanical engineering, or electronics failure-analysis processes.
• Experience with cross-sectioning, fracture/failure analysis, reliability assessment, hazardous-material analysis, material composition analysis, or alternate-part recommendations.
• Knowledge of current material technologies, manufacturing processes, and relevant industry standards.
• Strong written and verbal communication skills.
• Strong problem-solving, attention to detail, and root-cause-analysis skills.
• Ability to work independently while collaborating effectively with engineering, quality, manufacturing, and other cross-functional partners.
• Demonstrated initiative, self-learning ability, and a continuous-improvement mindset.

Benefits

• Great work environment
• Professional development opportunities
• Challenging careers
• Competitive compensation

We must ensure no duplicate lines. Also we removed the Ideal Candidate paragraph; we could incorporate its content into About the role or Responsibilities? The Ideal Candidate paragraph adds more detail about candidate traits; we could incorporate into About the role or maybe into Qualifications. But we already have Qualifications covering desired qualifications; Ideal Candidate is more narrative. We could add a paragraph under About the role after the mission statement: "The ideal candidate is an experienced electronics test professional who enjoys working directly with hardware in a fast-paced engineering lab. They can confidently use test equipment, interpret drawings and schematics, diagnose difficult electronic failures, and complete board-level repair and soldering work with precision. They bring a strong foundation in analog, digital, and microprocessor circuit troubleshooting, along with practical experience supporting test stations and engineering prototypes or production hardware. They are detail-oriented, organized, capable of working independently, and comfortable partnering with design engineers to move issues from failure identification through root cause and resolution." That's substantive and not covered elsewhere. So we should include it, maybe as part of About the role after the mission paragraph. Thus About the role will have two paragraphs: first summary, second mission, third ideal candidate. Or we