Emergency Veterinarian | Full-Time or Part-Time

The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and structure it according to the rules. First, I need to identify the sections: 1. About the role / Overview - the introductory paragraphs about the hospital and emergency medicine 2. Emergency & Specialty Medicine - describes the collaborative environment with specialists 3. Diagnostic Capabilities - lists the diagnostic equipment 4. The Team - describes the team structure and culture 5. Our Culture - describes the culture, work-life harmony, scheduling 6. The Opportunity - this contains salary, benefits, etc. 7. Life in Central New York - describes the area 8. Contact information - Suzanne Blair Burtner email Now, I need to map these to the allowed heading types: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Looking at the content: - "About the role" could cover the initial description of the hospital and emergency department. - "Responsibilities" - not explicitly listed as duties, but the role is emergency clinician. The posting doesn't have a clear list of responsibilities. It describes the environment. Might not have a Responsibilities section. - "Requirements" / "Qualifications" - the posting says "If you're an experienced emergency clinician—or a veterinarian interested in building a career in emergency medicine". That's a qualification. Could include that. - "Skills" - not explicitly listed. - "Benefits" - The Opportunity section lists many benefits: salary, sign-on bonus, no negative accrual, no non-compete, equity, insurance, 401k, PTO, parental leave, CE allowance, full-time/part-time, flexible scheduling. - "Pay" - Salary starting at $150k commensurate with experience, plus production earnings. That's pay. - "Schedule" - Flexible, collaboratively developed scheduling. That's schedule. But the rules: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. Never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Also, do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it). The job title is not given explicitly but likely "Emergency Veterinarian" or similar. The posting starts with "Veterinary Medical Center of Central New York | East Syracuse, NY". That's the employer and location. Not a heading. Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it. There's no job ID. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The "Ready to Talk?" and contact info might be considered application instructions. The rule says remove application instructions. But the contact info is part of the posting. However, the instruction says "Remove ... application instructions." The contact info is for applying. I think we should omit the "Ready to Talk?" and contact details. But the user might want to keep it? The rule says remove application instructions. The contact info is essentially application instruction. I'll omit it. Also, the "Life in Central New York" is not a standard heading. Could be part of "About the role" or a separate section? The allowed headings are limited: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. "Life in Central New York" doesn't fit. Could be included in a "Benefits" section? Or maybe as a separate "About the role" subsection? But we must use only those headings. The rules say "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It says "e.g." meaning those are examples, but likely we should stick to those. However, the posting has distinct sections like "Emergency & Specialty Medicine", "Diagnostic Capabilities", "The Team", "Our Culture". Those are not in the list. But the rule says "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't say we cannot use other headings, but the examples are those. The instruction: "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." This suggests we should use those standard headings. But the posting has specific sections that don't map exactly. We need to map the content to those standard headings. Let's think: The posting is for an emergency veterinarian. The content describes the hospital, the team, culture, benefits, pay, schedule, location. We can structure as: - About the role: overview of the hospital, emergency department, collaboration with specialists, diagnostic capabilities, team, culture. - Qualifications: experienced emergency clinician or veterinarian interested in building a career in emergency medicine. - Benefits: list of benefits from The Opportunity. - Pay: salary starting at $150k plus production. - Schedule: flexible, collaboratively developed scheduling. But the posting also has "Emergency & Specialty Medicine", "Diagnostic Capabilities", "The Team", "Our Culture" as distinct sections. The rule says "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we need to include all that detail. We can include them as subsections under "About the role" using

? But the rule only mentions

for section headings. It doesn't forbid

. However, the instruction says "use

for section headings". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading levels. But to keep it simple, we can use

for the main sections and maybe

for subsections? The example only shows

. The output should be a HTML fragment. I think we can use

for the main sections and use

and

for content. For subsections, we could use

but the rule doesn't specify. Safer to use

for each distinct section from the posting, but the rule says "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." This implies we should use those specific headings. However, the posting doesn't have a "Responsibilities" section. It has "Emergency & Specialty Medicine", "Diagnostic Capabilities", "The Team", "Our Culture". Those are substantive. The rule says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". So we could create sections with those exact headings? But the allowed headings are listed as examples. The instruction: "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not an exhaustive list. But the system prompt might expect us to use those standard headings. However, the user provided a specific posting with its own sections. The rule "Preserve ALL substantive information" suggests we should keep the sections as they are, but using

for each. The example headings are just examples. I think we should use the headings from the posting: "Emergency & Specialty Medicine", "Diagnostic Capabilities", "The Team", "Our Culture", "The Opportunity", "Life in Central New York". But "The Opportunity" includes pay, benefits, schedule. We could split that into Pay, Benefits, Schedule. And "Life in Central New York" could be a section. But the rule: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it." The job title is not in the posting text. The posting starts with "Veterinary Medical Center of Central New York | East Syracuse, NY". That's employer and location. Could be a

at top. Let's decide: I'll create the following

sections based on the posting's structure: 1. About the role (for the introductory paragraphs) 2. Emergency & Specialty Medicine 3. Diagnostic Capabilities 4. The Team 5. Our Culture 6. Pay (from The Opportunity) 7. Benefits (from The Opportunity) 8. Schedule (from The Opportunity) 9. Life in Central New York But the rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Some of these are thin? "Emergency & Specialty Medicine" has a paragraph and a list of specialties. "Diagnostic Capabilities" has a list. "The Team" has a few paragraphs. "Our Culture" has a few paragraphs. "Life in Central New York" has a few paragraphs. They are substantive. Alternatively, we could combine "Emergency & Specialty Medicine", "Diagnostic Capabilities", "The Team", "Our Culture" under "About the role" as subsections. But the rule says use

for section headings. It doesn't forbid multiple

s. I think it's okay to have multiple

sections. Also, the "Qualifications" section: the posting says "If you're an experienced emergency clinician—or a veterinarian interested in building a career in emergency medicine". That's a qualification. Could be a "Qualifications" section. But the posting doesn't have a clear "Requirements" list. So maybe not. Let's structure: - Start with a

for the employer and location: "Veterinary Medical Center of Central New York, East Syracuse, NY" - Then

About the role

with the first two paragraphs (the intro and the emergency department description). - Then

Emergency & Specialty Medicine

with the paragraph and list of specialties. - Then

Diagnostic Capabilities

with the list. - Then

The Team

with paragraphs. - Then

Our Culture

with paragraphs. - Then

Pay

with salary info. - Then

Benefits

with list of benefits. - Then

Schedule

with scheduling info. - Then

Life in Central New York

with paragraphs. - Omit the "Ready to Talk?" and contact info. But note: The Opportunity section includes "Salary starting at $150k commensurate with experience, plus production earnings", "Negotiable sign-on bonus", "No negative accrual", "No non-compete", "Equity opportunity...", "Medical, dental, and vision insurance", "401(k) with company match", "Paid time off", "Paid parental leave", "Continuing education allowance", "Full-time and part-time opportunities available", "Flexible, collaboratively developed scheduling". Some of these are pay, some benefits, some schedule. We'll split accordingly. Pay: salary, production earnings, sign-on bonus? Sign-on bonus is a benefit. But pay section can include salary and production. Benefits: sign-on bonus, no negative accrual, no non-compete, equity, insurance, 401k, PTO, parental leave, CE allowance, full-time/part-time. Schedule: flexible, collaboratively developed scheduling. Also "No negative accrual" and "No non-compete" are benefits. Now, the rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting does state them. Now, the "Qualifications" - the posting says "If you're an experienced emergency clinician—or a veterinarian interested in building a career in emergency medicine". That's a qualification. Could add a

Qualifications

with that sentence. But the rule: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". That is specific. Now