Electrical Engineer SME - AI Data Centers
for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must only include sections when posting has real specific content. We need to map content to these headings.
We have "About The Role" -> heading About the role.
Responsibilities: we have "Key Contributions" which includes Technical Leadership & Power Systems, Strategic Impact & Business Development, Mentorship, Standards & Design-Build Delivery. Those are responsibilities. So we can put a Responsibilities section with - items summarizing each bullet? Must preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. We need to keep details, not summarize away. So we need to list each bullet as
- preserving the text. Could break into multiple
- items.
Requirements: Education, PE License, Experience, etc. Also "Here's what you'll need" includes Education, PE License, Experience, Power Systems, Power Analysis Tools, Codes & Standards, Tools & Delivery. Those are requirements. So we can put Requirements section with
- each bullet.
Qualifications: maybe "Ideally, You'll Also Have" could be Qualifications or Skills. The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Skills). So we need to decide where to put "Ideally, You'll Also Have". Could be Qualifications or Skills. Since it's "Ideally, You'll Also Have" includes hyperscale clients experience, AI/GPU and energy, Commissioning, Industry presence. Those are additional qualifications/skills. Could put under Qualifications.
Skills: maybe we could separate technical skills like tools, standards etc. But we already put those under Requirements. Might be redundant. Better to follow: Requirements for mandatory, Qualifications for preferred, Skills for technical skills? However we must not create thin sections. We need to ensure each section has substantive content.
We have Benefits paragraph: health, dental, vision, basic life insurance, 401(k), ability to purchase company stock at discount, deferred compensation plan, Executive Deferral Plan, unlimited US Personalized Paid Time Off (PPTO) for full-time salaried/exempt employees, seven paid holidays, caregiver leave, merit increases, performance discretionary bonus, stock. Also mention hybrid working policy? That's work environment.
Pay: base salary range $191,300.00 to $263,000.00.
Schedule: maybe work environment includes travel 10%-15%, on-call availability, hybrid working policy. Could be Schedule? But schedule heading is for schedule details like full-time, part-time, shift. Not present. Could omit Schedule if no specific schedule info. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. We have Pay and Benefits stated. Schedule not explicitly stated; we have work environment with travel %, on-call, hybrid. That's not schedule per se. Could we treat as Schedule? Might be stretching. Better to omit Schedule section.
We also need to include any metadata like Job ID etc folded into short p or drop. Not needed.
We must remove boilerplate: EEO lines, etc. Remove the EEO paragraph. Also remove "Job posted on May 07, 2025. This position will be open for at least 3 days." etc. Also remove application instructions, etc.
We must preserve all substantive information. So we need to keep the hybrid working policy statement: "We empower employees with our hybrid working policy, allowing them to split their work week between Jacobs offices/projects and remote locations enabling them to deliver their best work." Also "We value collaboration and believe that in-person interactions are crucial for both our culture and client delivery." That's part of work environment.
We need to include Work Environment? Not a heading in list but we could incorporate into Responsibilities? Actually we have a heading list includes Schedule but not Work Environment. Could we put work environment under Responsibilities? Not ideal. Perhaps we can create a "Work Environment" section but not in allowed headings list? The instruction says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says e.g., implying those are examples but we should use those headings. It says "Use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we should limit to those headings. So we need to fit work environment content into one of those. Perhaps under Responsibilities (includes work environment) or under Skills? Better to put under Responsibilities as part of role description.
We also have "Primarily office-based with up to 10% - 15% travel to project sites and client locations; on-call availability for active commissioning programs and critical electrical system support." That's work environment.
Thus Responsibilities section can include both key contributions and work environment details.
Now we need to ensure we don't repeat job title as heading. Not needed.
We must output only HTML fragment.
Let's craft:
About the role
At Jacobs, we never settle — we push boundaries, elevate standards, and deliver with purpose. Power is the foundational constraint of every hyperscale data center program, and the Electrical SME is the technical authority Jacobs and its clients depend on to solve it. You will shape electrical infrastructure strategy from utility interconnection through to IT equipment receptacle — medium-voltage distribution, UPS topology, generator plant design, switchgear paralleling, arc flash safety programs, and the escalating power density demands of AI and GPU-dense compute environments. This role blends deep power systems expertise with client-facing leadership, strategic pursuit involvement, and discipline mentorship across a portfolio of hyperscale and mission-critical programs.
Responsibilities
- Technical Leadership & Power Systems: Lead upfront power systems planning with hyperscale clients — defining MV/LV distribution architecture, redundancy strategies (2N, N+1, 2(N+1)), and utility interconnection approaches aligned with owner reliability and sustainability requirements.
- Drive the full power chain from medium-voltage switchgear through UPS, generator paralleling, transfer switching, PDUs, and busway; lead power systems studies including short-circuit analysis, protective device coordination, arc flash per IEEE 1584, and load flow modeling using ETAP, SKM PowerTools, or equivalent.
- Champion innovation in power efficiency, BESS integration, renewable energy, and AI/GPU power density scaling to 20–60+ kW per rack; develop and maintain Jacobs' electrical standards, master specifications, and calculation libraries for the data center practice.
- Provide technical governance for electrical deliverables across discipline teams and GID partners — reviewing calculations, drawings, and submittals for quality and code compliance; support commissioning and integrated systems testing (IST) of critical power systems.
- Strategic Impact & Business Development: Act as the external face of Jacobs' electrical expertise — presenting at client workshops and industry forums including AFCOM, 7x24 Exchange, Uptime Institute, and IEEE; participate in RFP responses and competitive presentations that translate complex power systems engineering into strategic narrative for owner-side decision-makers.
- Partner with business development and delivery leadership to win high-value data center programs through technical differentiation, proposal content, and articulation of Jacobs' power systems value proposition.
- Influence Jacobs' delivery strategy through identification of emerging power system technologies, evolving hyperscale client requirements, and technical differentiation opportunities.
- Mentorship, Standards & Design-Build Delivery: Mentor and coach electrical engineers and designers within the data center practice; build and sustain an internal knowledge base of reusable calculation packages, specification libraries, and reference designs that improve delivery quality and velocity.
- Represent Jacobs in IEEE Power and Energy Society, NFPA, 7x24 Exchange, and Uptime Institute; contribute to industry working groups, standards development, and external thought leadership through technical publications and conference presentations.
- Balance strategic initiatives with hands-on project execution; apply technical authority within Design-Build delivery structures — advocating for design intent under contractor challenge and ensuring compliance with NEC (NFPA 70), NFPA 110, NFPA 72, IEEE 3000-series, NESC, IEC, and Uptime Institute Tier classification criteria.
- Work Environment: Primarily office-based with up to 10% - 15% travel to project sites and client locations; on-call availability for active commissioning programs and critical electrical system support. Collaborative, multi-discipline EPC environment with close coordination across mechanical, structural, civil, and program management teams and regular engagement with GID delivery teammates across global time zones. We value collaboration and believe that in-person interactions are crucial for both our culture and client delivery. We empower employees with our hybrid working policy, allowing them to split their work week between Jacobs offices/projects and remote locations enabling them to deliver their best work.
Requirements
- Education: Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from an ABET-accredited program; Master's degree preferred.
- PE License (Required): Active Electrical PE licensure in at least one U.S. state; NCEES record maintained for reciprocal licensure. PE is a condition of employment — candidates without active licensure will not be advanced.
- Experience: 20+ years of professional electrical engineering; 15+ years focused on mission-critical data center or advanced technology facility design.
- Power Systems: Proven expertise in MV/LV distribution design, UPS topology selection, generator plant sizing and paralleling, transfer switching, and electrical redundancy architecture for Tier III and Tier IV facilities.
- Power Analysis Tools: Proficiency with ETAP, SKM PowerTools, or EasyPower — short-circuit studies, protective device coordination, arc flash analysis per IEEE 1584, and load flow modeling.
- Codes & Standards: NEC (NFPA 70), NFPA 110, NFPA 72, IEEE 3000-series, NESC, IEC standards, and Uptime Institute Tier classification requirements.
- Tools & Delivery: AutoCAD Electrical, Revit MEP, Bluebeam, BIM 360 or Autodesk Construction Cloud; demonstrated ability to manage design intent within Design-Build and EPCM contract structures.
Qualifications
- Ideally, You'll Also Have: Delivered electrical infrastructure for hyperscale, colocation, or enterprise DC programs with Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon, or Equinix.
- AI/GPU and energy: High-density power distribution at 20–60+ kW per rack; 400V busway, overhead PDU; BESS, on-site renewables, demand response, and PUE/WUE/ERE optimization.
- Commissioning: FAT/SAT and IST experience for large generator plants, UPS systems, and critical power systems on hyperscale programs.
- Industry presence: Active participation in IEEE PES, 7x24 Exchange, AFCOM, or Uptime Institute; published technical papers or conference presentations in mission-critical power engineering.
Benefits
- Medical, dental, vision, and basic life insurance.
- each bullet.
Qualifications: maybe "Ideally, You'll Also Have" could be Qualifications or Skills. The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Skills). So we need to decide where to put "Ideally, You'll Also Have". Could be Qualifications or Skills. Since it's "Ideally, You'll Also Have" includes hyperscale clients experience, AI/GPU and energy, Commissioning, Industry presence. Those are additional qualifications/skills. Could put under Qualifications.
Skills: maybe we could separate technical skills like tools, standards etc. But we already put those under Requirements. Might be redundant. Better to follow: Requirements for mandatory, Qualifications for preferred, Skills for technical skills? However we must not create thin sections. We need to ensure each section has substantive content.
We have Benefits paragraph: health, dental, vision, basic life insurance, 401(k), ability to purchase company stock at discount, deferred compensation plan, Executive Deferral Plan, unlimited US Personalized Paid Time Off (PPTO) for full-time salaried/exempt employees, seven paid holidays, caregiver leave, merit increases, performance discretionary bonus, stock. Also mention hybrid working policy? That's work environment.
Pay: base salary range $191,300.00 to $263,000.00.
Schedule: maybe work environment includes travel 10%-15%, on-call availability, hybrid working policy. Could be Schedule? But schedule heading is for schedule details like full-time, part-time, shift. Not present. Could omit Schedule if no specific schedule info. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. We have Pay and Benefits stated. Schedule not explicitly stated; we have work environment with travel %, on-call, hybrid. That's not schedule per se. Could we treat as Schedule? Might be stretching. Better to omit Schedule section.
We also need to include any metadata like Job ID etc folded into short p or drop. Not needed.
We must remove boilerplate: EEO lines, etc. Remove the EEO paragraph. Also remove "Job posted on May 07, 2025. This position will be open for at least 3 days." etc. Also remove application instructions, etc.
We must preserve all substantive information. So we need to keep the hybrid working policy statement: "We empower employees with our hybrid working policy, allowing them to split their work week between Jacobs offices/projects and remote locations enabling them to deliver their best work." Also "We value collaboration and believe that in-person interactions are crucial for both our culture and client delivery." That's part of work environment.
We need to include Work Environment? Not a heading in list but we could incorporate into Responsibilities? Actually we have a heading list includes Schedule but not Work Environment. Could we put work environment under Responsibilities? Not ideal. Perhaps we can create a "Work Environment" section but not in allowed headings list? The instruction says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says e.g., implying those are examples but we should use those headings. It says "Use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we should limit to those headings. So we need to fit work environment content into one of those. Perhaps under Responsibilities (includes work environment) or under Skills? Better to put under Responsibilities as part of role description. We also have "Primarily office-based with up to 10% - 15% travel to project sites and client locations; on-call availability for active commissioning programs and critical electrical system support." That's work environment. Thus Responsibilities section can include both key contributions and work environment details. Now we need to ensure we don't repeat job title as heading. Not needed. We must output only HTML fragment. Let's craft:
About the role
At Jacobs, we never settle — we push boundaries, elevate standards, and deliver with purpose. Power is the foundational constraint of every hyperscale data center program, and the Electrical SME is the technical authority Jacobs and its clients depend on to solve it. You will shape electrical infrastructure strategy from utility interconnection through to IT equipment receptacle — medium-voltage distribution, UPS topology, generator plant design, switchgear paralleling, arc flash safety programs, and the escalating power density demands of AI and GPU-dense compute environments. This role blends deep power systems expertise with client-facing leadership, strategic pursuit involvement, and discipline mentorship across a portfolio of hyperscale and mission-critical programs.
Responsibilities
- Technical Leadership & Power Systems: Lead upfront power systems planning with hyperscale clients — defining MV/LV distribution architecture, redundancy strategies (2N, N+1, 2(N+1)), and utility interconnection approaches aligned with owner reliability and sustainability requirements.
- Drive the full power chain from medium-voltage switchgear through UPS, generator paralleling, transfer switching, PDUs, and busway; lead power systems studies including short-circuit analysis, protective device coordination, arc flash per IEEE 1584, and load flow modeling using ETAP, SKM PowerTools, or equivalent.
- Champion innovation in power efficiency, BESS integration, renewable energy, and AI/GPU power density scaling to 20–60+ kW per rack; develop and maintain Jacobs' electrical standards, master specifications, and calculation libraries for the data center practice.
- Provide technical governance for electrical deliverables across discipline teams and GID partners — reviewing calculations, drawings, and submittals for quality and code compliance; support commissioning and integrated systems testing (IST) of critical power systems.
- Strategic Impact & Business Development: Act as the external face of Jacobs' electrical expertise — presenting at client workshops and industry forums including AFCOM, 7x24 Exchange, Uptime Institute, and IEEE; participate in RFP responses and competitive presentations that translate complex power systems engineering into strategic narrative for owner-side decision-makers.
- Partner with business development and delivery leadership to win high-value data center programs through technical differentiation, proposal content, and articulation of Jacobs' power systems value proposition.
- Influence Jacobs' delivery strategy through identification of emerging power system technologies, evolving hyperscale client requirements, and technical differentiation opportunities.
- Mentorship, Standards & Design-Build Delivery: Mentor and coach electrical engineers and designers within the data center practice; build and sustain an internal knowledge base of reusable calculation packages, specification libraries, and reference designs that improve delivery quality and velocity.
- Represent Jacobs in IEEE Power and Energy Society, NFPA, 7x24 Exchange, and Uptime Institute; contribute to industry working groups, standards development, and external thought leadership through technical publications and conference presentations.
- Balance strategic initiatives with hands-on project execution; apply technical authority within Design-Build delivery structures — advocating for design intent under contractor challenge and ensuring compliance with NEC (NFPA 70), NFPA 110, NFPA 72, IEEE 3000-series, NESC, IEC, and Uptime Institute Tier classification criteria.
- Work Environment: Primarily office-based with up to 10% - 15% travel to project sites and client locations; on-call availability for active commissioning programs and critical electrical system support. Collaborative, multi-discipline EPC environment with close coordination across mechanical, structural, civil, and program management teams and regular engagement with GID delivery teammates across global time zones. We value collaboration and believe that in-person interactions are crucial for both our culture and client delivery. We empower employees with our hybrid working policy, allowing them to split their work week between Jacobs offices/projects and remote locations enabling them to deliver their best work.
Requirements
- Education: Bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from an ABET-accredited program; Master's degree preferred.
- PE License (Required): Active Electrical PE licensure in at least one U.S. state; NCEES record maintained for reciprocal licensure. PE is a condition of employment — candidates without active licensure will not be advanced.
- Experience: 20+ years of professional electrical engineering; 15+ years focused on mission-critical data center or advanced technology facility design.
- Power Systems: Proven expertise in MV/LV distribution design, UPS topology selection, generator plant sizing and paralleling, transfer switching, and electrical redundancy architecture for Tier III and Tier IV facilities.
- Power Analysis Tools: Proficiency with ETAP, SKM PowerTools, or EasyPower — short-circuit studies, protective device coordination, arc flash analysis per IEEE 1584, and load flow modeling.
- Codes & Standards: NEC (NFPA 70), NFPA 110, NFPA 72, IEEE 3000-series, NESC, IEC standards, and Uptime Institute Tier classification requirements.
- Tools & Delivery: AutoCAD Electrical, Revit MEP, Bluebeam, BIM 360 or Autodesk Construction Cloud; demonstrated ability to manage design intent within Design-Build and EPCM contract structures.
Qualifications
- Ideally, You'll Also Have: Delivered electrical infrastructure for hyperscale, colocation, or enterprise DC programs with Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon, or Equinix.
- AI/GPU and energy: High-density power distribution at 20–60+ kW per rack; 400V busway, overhead PDU; BESS, on-site renewables, demand response, and PUE/WUE/ERE optimization.
- Commissioning: FAT/SAT and IST experience for large generator plants, UPS systems, and critical power systems on hyperscale programs.
- Industry presence: Active participation in IEEE PES, 7x24 Exchange, AFCOM, or Uptime Institute; published technical papers or conference presentations in mission-critical power engineering.
Benefits
- Medical, dental, vision, and basic life insurance.