Director - Investor Relations
ARCHIMED · New York, NY · 1 mo ago
Marketing$11/hrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with headings for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes: About Archimed (company description) maybe not needed as heading? The instructions: use
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes: About Archimed (company description) maybe not needed as heading? The instructions: use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading. So we need sections: About the role (maybe description of role), Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to see what content exists.
From posting:
- About Archimed: description of firm. Could be considered "About the role"? Actually "About the role" is separate from company description. The posting includes "THE ROLE" description. That could be "About the role". We'll put that under About the role
with paragraphs.
- Responsibilities: The posting includes sections: FUNDRAISING LEADERSHIP, IR FUNCTION OWNERSHIP, CO-INVESTMENTS, GP-LED SECONDARIES AND STRATEGIC VEHICLES. Those are responsibilities. We'll list them as bullet points under - .
- Requirements: The posting includes "Requirements" bullet list: Senior IR professional with approx 10-15 years... etc. We'll list as bullet points.
- Qualifications: Might be overlapping with Requirements; but we can treat "Higher education degree..." as Qualifications. Also CFA or MBA a plus. We'll put under Qualifications.
- Skills: Could be "Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems..." etc. Also "Strong financial acumen...", "Exceptional communicator.", "Commercial mindset...". Those could be Skills. We'll separate.
- Benefits: The posting includes "Benefits Health, Vision and Dental premiums covered 100% by ARCHIMED Carried Interest August Summer Shutdown Winter Shutdown (Christmas - New Years) Monthly Commute Stipend more". That's a bit messy but we can extract: Health, Vision, Dental premiums covered 100%; Carried Interest; August Summer Shutdown; Winter Shutdown (Christmas - New Years); Monthly Commute Stipend. We'll list as bullet points.
- Pay: Not mentioned explicitly. No salary or pay range. So we should NOT include Pay section.
- Schedule: Not mentioned. No schedule info. So omit.
We must not include sections with placeholder text. So only include sections with real content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits.
We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not omit details. We need to include all details from the posting, but we can reorganize into headings and lists.
We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Not present.
We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences.
Let's craft.
First, About the role: combine the paragraphs under THE ROLE.
Paragraphs:
"Reporting to the Head of Investor Relations, the Director of Investor Relations will play a leadership role in the strategic direction and execution of ARCHIMED's global capital formation and LP engagement efforts. This is a senior, high-visibility position with direct exposure to the firm's Partners and leadership, significant LP-facing responsibility and ownership of material components of the IR function."
Then we have subsections: FUNDRAISING LEADERSHIP, IR FUNCTION OWNERSHIP, CO-INVESTMENTS, GP-LED SECONDARIES AND STRATEGIC VEHICLES. Those could be responsibilities.
But we could also include them under About the role as prose? Better to put responsibilities as list.
Thus About the role paragraph: just the first two sentences? Might also include overall role description. We'll keep that.
Responsibilities: list each bullet from the three sections.
Let's extract details:
FUNDRAISING LEADERSHIP:
- Partner with the Head of Investor Relations and firm leadership to shape fundraising strategy across flagship funds, co-investment vehicles and GP-led secondaries, including market positioning, investor segmentation and campaign sequencing.
- Own the end-to-end production of institutional-quality fundraising materials (PPM, DDQ, pitch decks, VDR, track record analytics) and manage the legal and structural workstreams alongside external counsel and service providers.
- Serve as a senior external voice for the firm. Represent ARCHIMED at investor conferences, industry events and LP meetings, and articulate the firm's strategy, performance and impact thesis with credibility and precision.
- Build, deepen and independently manage a portfolio of global LP relationships across sovereign wealth funds, pension plans, insurance companies, endowments, foundations, fund of funds, family offices and consultants.
- Identify and cultivate new pools of capital to support the firm's growth trajectory.
- Lead select roadshows, drive pipeline development and hold direct accountability for LP commitments and conversion metrics.
IR FUNCTION OWNERSHIP:
- Oversee the operation of the firm's IR program, including quarterly and annual fund and co-investment reporting in partnership with Finance, Impact and Investment Teams.
- Own LP servicing including capital calls, distributions, information requests, secondary transfers and bespoke LP workstreams, and establish the standards and playbooks that scale with AUM growth.
- Lead the planning and delivery of the Investor AGM and other flagship LP events in close coordination with the Communications team.
- Mentor and develop junior IR team members and contribute to the build-out of the function as the platform grows.
CO-INVESTMENTS, GP-LED SECONDARIES AND STRATEGIC VEHICLES:
- Drive the firm's co-investment program with existing LPs and the broader institutional community, working alongside deal teams to syndicate opportunities efficiently and on favorable terms.
- Contribute to the strategic evolution of ARCHIMED's fund platform by structuring and leading GP-led secondaries, continuation vehicles and other bespoke capital solutions where appropriate.
Now Requirements: list bullet points.
From "Requirements" paragraph:
- Senior IR professional with approximately 10 to 15 years of relevant experience in investor relations, fundraising or LP coverage within private equity or alternative asset management.
- Prior experience raising institutional capital at scale is essential.
- Established network of institutional LP relationships across multiple geographies, with a demonstrated ability to manage complex relationships independently and convert dialogue into commitments.
- Strong financial acumen. Fluency with fund structuring, LPA terms, performance metrics (gross and net IRR, TVPI, DPI, PME), portfolio analytics and the quantitative diligence expected by sophisticated LPs.
- Deep knowledge of market practice, fund terms, fee structures and the competitive landscape in healthcare and broader PE.
- Exceptional communicator. Able to translate complex investment theses, industry dynamics and deal structures into clear, factual narratives for the most sophisticated audiences.
- Commercial mindset and entrepreneurial orientation. Capable of identifying new market opportunities, new channels and new product formats to expand AUM.
- Proven ability to operate in a fast-paced environment, manage competing priorities and deliver under pressure without sacrificing quality.
- Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems (Dynamo, Backstop, Altvia or similar) preferred.
- Higher education degree in finance, economics or business administration.
- CFA or MBA a plus.
- Embodies ARCHIMED's cultural values of inclusion, meritocracy, partnership, accountability, client focus and trust.
Now Qualifications: maybe we separate education and certifications? But we already have those in Requirements. However we need to follow instruction: use headings for Qualifications if there is real specific content. The posting includes "Higher education degree..." and "CFA or MBA a plus." That's qualifications. We could keep them under Qualifications. But we already have them in Requirements; we risk duplication. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. It doesn't forbid duplication across sections, but better to avoid redundancy. However we need to decide where to put each piece. We could treat Requirements as experience and skills, Qualifications as education/certifications. Let's split:
Requirements: experience items (years, fundraising experience, LP network, financial acumen, market knowledge, communicator, commercial mindset, ability to operate fast-paced, values). Qualifications: education degree, CFA/MBA plus. Skills: Advanced Excel/PowerPoint, fluency with IR CRM systems, maybe also strong financial acumen? But financial acumen is more a requirement. We'll keep skills separate: Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems (Dynamo, Backstop, Altvia or similar) preferred.
But we also have "Exceptional communicator." etc. That could be Skills as well. However we already used communicator under Requirements. Might be okay to have overlapping but we need to avoid duplication? The instruction didn't forbid duplication but said preserve ALL substantive information; not summarizing away detail. Duplication preserves detail but repeats. Might be okay but better to avoid.
Let's design:
- About the role: paragraph.
- Responsibilities: list as above.
- Requirements: list experience-based items (years, fundraising experience, LP network, financial acumen, market knowledge, commercial mindset, ability to operate fast-paced, values). Also maybe "Strong financial acumen" etc.
- Qualifications: list education degree, CFA/MBA a plus.
- Skills: list Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills, Fluency with IR CRM systems.
- Benefits: list benefits.
Check that we haven't missed any detail: The "Exceptional communicator" and "Able to translate complex investment theses..." is a skill/competency; we could put under Skills as well. But we already have financial acumen under Requirements. Might be better to put all competency items under Skills, and keep Requirements strictly about experience and network. Let's re-evaluate.
The posting's "Requirements" section includes all those bullet-like sentences. It might be intended as a combined list of requirements (including skills, qualifications). But the instruction wants us to use headings for Qualifications, Skills etc if content exists. So we need to parse the content into those categories.
Let's extract all sentences from the "Requirements" paragraph and categorize:
1. Senior IR professional with approximately 10 to 15 years of relevant experience in investor relations, fundraising or LP coverage within private equity or alternative asset management. -> Experience (years, field).
2. Prior experience raising institutional capital at scale is essential. -> Experience.
3. Established network of institutional LP relationships across multiple geographies, with a demonstrated ability to manage complex relationships independently and convert dialogue into commitments. -> Experience (network).
4. Strong financial acumen. Fluency with fund structuring, LPA terms, performance metrics (gross and net IRR, TVPI, DPI, PME), portfolio analytics and the quantitative diligence expected by sophisticated LPs. -> Skill/Knowledge.
5. Deep knowledge of market practice, fund terms, fee structures and the competitive landscape in healthcare and broader PE. -> Knowledge.
6. Exceptional communicator. Able to translate complex investment theses, industry dynamics and deal structures into clear, factual narratives for the most sophisticated audiences. -> Skill.
7. Commercial mindset and entrepreneurial orientation. Capable of identifying new market opportunities, new channels and new product formats to expand AUM. -> Skill/Mindset.
8. Proven ability to operate in a fast-paced environment, manage competing priorities and deliver under pressure without sacrificing quality. -> Skill.
9. Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems (Dynamo, Backstop, Altvia or similar) preferred. -> Skill.
10. Higher education degree in finance, economics or business administration. -> Qualification.
11. CFA or MBA a plus. -> Qualification.
12. Embodies ARCHIMED's cultural values of inclusion, meritocracy, partnership, accountability, client focus and trust. -> Cultural fit (could be Requirement or Skill). We'll put under Requirements maybe as "Cultural fit".
About the role
with paragraphs. - Responsibilities: The posting includes sections: FUNDRAISING LEADERSHIP, IR FUNCTION OWNERSHIP, CO-INVESTMENTS, GP-LED SECONDARIES AND STRATEGIC VEHICLES. Those are responsibilities. We'll list them as bullet points under- . - Requirements: The posting includes "Requirements" bullet list: Senior IR professional with approx 10-15 years... etc. We'll list as bullet points. - Qualifications: Might be overlapping with Requirements; but we can treat "Higher education degree..." as Qualifications. Also CFA or MBA a plus. We'll put under Qualifications. - Skills: Could be "Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems..." etc. Also "Strong financial acumen...", "Exceptional communicator.", "Commercial mindset...". Those could be Skills. We'll separate. - Benefits: The posting includes "Benefits Health, Vision and Dental premiums covered 100% by ARCHIMED Carried Interest August Summer Shutdown Winter Shutdown (Christmas - New Years) Monthly Commute Stipend more". That's a bit messy but we can extract: Health, Vision, Dental premiums covered 100%; Carried Interest; August Summer Shutdown; Winter Shutdown (Christmas - New Years); Monthly Commute Stipend. We'll list as bullet points. - Pay: Not mentioned explicitly. No salary or pay range. So we should NOT include Pay section. - Schedule: Not mentioned. No schedule info. So omit. We must not include sections with placeholder text. So only include sections with real content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not omit details. We need to include all details from the posting, but we can reorganize into headings and lists. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Not present. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences. Let's craft. First, About the role: combine the paragraphs under THE ROLE. Paragraphs: "Reporting to the Head of Investor Relations, the Director of Investor Relations will play a leadership role in the strategic direction and execution of ARCHIMED's global capital formation and LP engagement efforts. This is a senior, high-visibility position with direct exposure to the firm's Partners and leadership, significant LP-facing responsibility and ownership of material components of the IR function." Then we have subsections: FUNDRAISING LEADERSHIP, IR FUNCTION OWNERSHIP, CO-INVESTMENTS, GP-LED SECONDARIES AND STRATEGIC VEHICLES. Those could be responsibilities. But we could also include them under About the role as prose? Better to put responsibilities as list. Thus About the role paragraph: just the first two sentences? Might also include overall role description. We'll keep that. Responsibilities: list each bullet from the three sections. Let's extract details: FUNDRAISING LEADERSHIP: - Partner with the Head of Investor Relations and firm leadership to shape fundraising strategy across flagship funds, co-investment vehicles and GP-led secondaries, including market positioning, investor segmentation and campaign sequencing. - Own the end-to-end production of institutional-quality fundraising materials (PPM, DDQ, pitch decks, VDR, track record analytics) and manage the legal and structural workstreams alongside external counsel and service providers. - Serve as a senior external voice for the firm. Represent ARCHIMED at investor conferences, industry events and LP meetings, and articulate the firm's strategy, performance and impact thesis with credibility and precision. - Build, deepen and independently manage a portfolio of global LP relationships across sovereign wealth funds, pension plans, insurance companies, endowments, foundations, fund of funds, family offices and consultants. - Identify and cultivate new pools of capital to support the firm's growth trajectory. - Lead select roadshows, drive pipeline development and hold direct accountability for LP commitments and conversion metrics. IR FUNCTION OWNERSHIP: - Oversee the operation of the firm's IR program, including quarterly and annual fund and co-investment reporting in partnership with Finance, Impact and Investment Teams. - Own LP servicing including capital calls, distributions, information requests, secondary transfers and bespoke LP workstreams, and establish the standards and playbooks that scale with AUM growth. - Lead the planning and delivery of the Investor AGM and other flagship LP events in close coordination with the Communications team. - Mentor and develop junior IR team members and contribute to the build-out of the function as the platform grows. CO-INVESTMENTS, GP-LED SECONDARIES AND STRATEGIC VEHICLES: - Drive the firm's co-investment program with existing LPs and the broader institutional community, working alongside deal teams to syndicate opportunities efficiently and on favorable terms. - Contribute to the strategic evolution of ARCHIMED's fund platform by structuring and leading GP-led secondaries, continuation vehicles and other bespoke capital solutions where appropriate. Now Requirements: list bullet points. From "Requirements" paragraph: - Senior IR professional with approximately 10 to 15 years of relevant experience in investor relations, fundraising or LP coverage within private equity or alternative asset management. - Prior experience raising institutional capital at scale is essential. - Established network of institutional LP relationships across multiple geographies, with a demonstrated ability to manage complex relationships independently and convert dialogue into commitments. - Strong financial acumen. Fluency with fund structuring, LPA terms, performance metrics (gross and net IRR, TVPI, DPI, PME), portfolio analytics and the quantitative diligence expected by sophisticated LPs. - Deep knowledge of market practice, fund terms, fee structures and the competitive landscape in healthcare and broader PE. - Exceptional communicator. Able to translate complex investment theses, industry dynamics and deal structures into clear, factual narratives for the most sophisticated audiences. - Commercial mindset and entrepreneurial orientation. Capable of identifying new market opportunities, new channels and new product formats to expand AUM. - Proven ability to operate in a fast-paced environment, manage competing priorities and deliver under pressure without sacrificing quality. - Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems (Dynamo, Backstop, Altvia or similar) preferred. - Higher education degree in finance, economics or business administration. - CFA or MBA a plus. - Embodies ARCHIMED's cultural values of inclusion, meritocracy, partnership, accountability, client focus and trust. Now Qualifications: maybe we separate education and certifications? But we already have those in Requirements. However we need to follow instruction: use headings for Qualifications if there is real specific content. The posting includes "Higher education degree..." and "CFA or MBA a plus." That's qualifications. We could keep them under Qualifications. But we already have them in Requirements; we risk duplication. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. It doesn't forbid duplication across sections, but better to avoid redundancy. However we need to decide where to put each piece. We could treat Requirements as experience and skills, Qualifications as education/certifications. Let's split: Requirements: experience items (years, fundraising experience, LP network, financial acumen, market knowledge, communicator, commercial mindset, ability to operate fast-paced, values). Qualifications: education degree, CFA/MBA plus. Skills: Advanced Excel/PowerPoint, fluency with IR CRM systems, maybe also strong financial acumen? But financial acumen is more a requirement. We'll keep skills separate: Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems (Dynamo, Backstop, Altvia or similar) preferred. But we also have "Exceptional communicator." etc. That could be Skills as well. However we already used communicator under Requirements. Might be okay to have overlapping but we need to avoid duplication? The instruction didn't forbid duplication but said preserve ALL substantive information; not summarizing away detail. Duplication preserves detail but repeats. Might be okay but better to avoid. Let's design: - About the role: paragraph. - Responsibilities: list as above. - Requirements: list experience-based items (years, fundraising experience, LP network, financial acumen, market knowledge, commercial mindset, ability to operate fast-paced, values). Also maybe "Strong financial acumen" etc. - Qualifications: list education degree, CFA/MBA a plus. - Skills: list Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills, Fluency with IR CRM systems. - Benefits: list benefits. Check that we haven't missed any detail: The "Exceptional communicator" and "Able to translate complex investment theses..." is a skill/competency; we could put under Skills as well. But we already have financial acumen under Requirements. Might be better to put all competency items under Skills, and keep Requirements strictly about experience and network. Let's re-evaluate. The posting's "Requirements" section includes all those bullet-like sentences. It might be intended as a combined list of requirements (including skills, qualifications). But the instruction wants us to use headings for Qualifications, Skills etc if content exists. So we need to parse the content into those categories. Let's extract all sentences from the "Requirements" paragraph and categorize: 1. Senior IR professional with approximately 10 to 15 years of relevant experience in investor relations, fundraising or LP coverage within private equity or alternative asset management. -> Experience (years, field). 2. Prior experience raising institutional capital at scale is essential. -> Experience. 3. Established network of institutional LP relationships across multiple geographies, with a demonstrated ability to manage complex relationships independently and convert dialogue into commitments. -> Experience (network). 4. Strong financial acumen. Fluency with fund structuring, LPA terms, performance metrics (gross and net IRR, TVPI, DPI, PME), portfolio analytics and the quantitative diligence expected by sophisticated LPs. -> Skill/Knowledge. 5. Deep knowledge of market practice, fund terms, fee structures and the competitive landscape in healthcare and broader PE. -> Knowledge. 6. Exceptional communicator. Able to translate complex investment theses, industry dynamics and deal structures into clear, factual narratives for the most sophisticated audiences. -> Skill. 7. Commercial mindset and entrepreneurial orientation. Capable of identifying new market opportunities, new channels and new product formats to expand AUM. -> Skill/Mindset. 8. Proven ability to operate in a fast-paced environment, manage competing priorities and deliver under pressure without sacrificing quality. -> Skill. 9. Advanced Excel and PowerPoint skills. Fluency with IR CRM systems (Dynamo, Backstop, Altvia or similar) preferred. -> Skill. 10. Higher education degree in finance, economics or business administration. -> Qualification. 11. CFA or MBA a plus. -> Qualification. 12. Embodies ARCHIMED's cultural values of inclusion, meritocracy, partnership, accountability, client focus and trust. -> Cultural fit (could be Requirement or Skill). We'll put under Requirements maybe as "Cultural fit".