Data and Process Engineer

We need to produce HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions). Also remove "Work Environment", "Physical Demands", "Work Eligibility", "Inclusion & Diversity", "Accommodations"? Those might be considered boilerplate? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The sections like Work Environment, Physical Demands, Work Eligibility, Inclusion & Diversity, Accommodations might be considered part of the posting but not boilerplate? They are not explicitly prohibited, but they might be considered part of the posting. However we need to decide whether to include them. The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we can keep other sections like Work Environment etc. But we must only include sections when posting has real specific content for it. The posting includes Work Environment, Physical Demands, Work Eligibility, Inclusion & Diversity, Accommodations. Those are specific content. Should we include them as sections? The allowed headings list includes only certain ones: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It says "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The e.g. suggests these are examples, but we should likely only use those headings. It says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So we need to map content to these headings. Likely we should produce sections: About the role (mission, description), Responsibilities (what you will be doing), Requirements (education, experience), Qualifications (maybe same as Requirements?), Skills (specific technical skills), Benefits (list of benefits), Pay (if mentioned), Schedule (if mentioned). The posting mentions "Competitive, market-based compensation package depending on your experience and knowledge." That's not a specific number, but it's mention of compensation. It says "Competitive, market-based compensation package depending on your experience and knowledge." That's somewhat vague but it's still content about pay. Should we include Pay section? The instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state compensation package, albeit not specific numbers. So we can include Pay with that sentence. Benefits: they list many benefits: Medical/Dental/Vision Insurance, 401(k) Incentive Savings Plan, Paid Time Off and Vacations, plus 9 fixed holidays and 2 floating holidays, Basic and Supplemental Life/AD&D Insurance, Short Term and Long-Term Disability Insurance, Tuition Reimbursement, Great atmosphere etc. So we can include Benefits. Schedule: not mentioned. No mention of work schedule (full-time, hours). So we should not include Schedule. Now About the role: we have introductory paragraphs about Vopak, mission, role description. Could be placed under About the role. Responsibilities: the bullet list under "What will you be doing?" includes many items. We'll put those as

• . Requirements: education and experience: Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Engineering or Data Science required; MBA preferred. Minimum 4 years relevant work experience, including 3+ years in Python software development and data science libraries. Extensive experience and mandatory proficiency in Snowflake and Power BI. Previous experience facilitating and managing process improvement projects using Lean and Six Sigma methodologies. Experience with CI/CD processes and tooling, as well as database systems management. Ability to read and interpret technical specifications, drawings, and regulatory documents. Excellent English communication skills (oral and written); Spanish language skills are helpful. Also "Don’t meet all our criteria? No problem! If this role energizes you and our culture feels like a good fit, we warmly invite you to apply anyway." That's more encouragement, maybe not a requirement. We'll keep as part of Requirements or maybe a note. Qualifications: Could be similar to Requirements; but we might combine. However we need to avoid duplication. Perhaps we treat Requirements as education/experience, Qualifications as specific technical proficiencies? But the instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine education/experience and technical skills into Requirements, and maybe Skills for specific tools/languages. But we already have Skills section for specific technical skills. Let's decide: - About the role: introductory narrative. - Responsibilities: list of duties. - Requirements: education, years experience, maybe language. - Skills: specific technical proficiencies (Python, Snowflake, Power BI, Lean/Six Sigma, CI/CD, database systems, ability to read specs, etc.) - Benefits: list. - Pay: statement about competitive market-based compensation. We must not repeat content. Ensure we capture all substantive info. Let's extract: About the role: "Process and Data Engineer Vopak helps the world flow forward. We store the energy of today and tomorrow. But behind our impressive terminals and tanks, it is our people who make the difference. Guided by our culture of Trust, Collaboration, and Courage, we focus on creating an impact that brings the opportunity to grow and to make a real difference. As Process and Data Engineer, you will play a key role in realizing our ambitions while building both the future of Vopak and your own. Your Mission Reporting to the Site Director in Deer Park, TX, the Process and Data Engineer is a newly created, high-visibility role in the Operations / Analytics department designed to bridge operational efficiency with advanced analytics. Your primary purpose is to design, develop, and deploy decision support systems that contribute to the organization becoming a more data-driven company." We can keep that as prose under About the role. Responsibilities (What will you be doing?): - Abide by and promote all safety procedures, champion safety, and participate in required safety training. - Design and develop automated data science pipelines, predictive models, and retraining systems within multi-disciplinary agile teams. - Manage a portfolio of process improvement initiatives and efficiency projects across all terminal departments. - Apply Six Sigma techniques (DMAIC) and Lean tools (Value Stream Mapping, Kaizen events, 5S) to optimize workflows, eliminate waste, and reduce process variation. - Establish, trend, and monitor Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure improvement effectiveness and review progress during operational meetings. - Spearhead Data Stewardship Management, establishing frameworks for data integrity, standardization, and governance for all operational metrics. - Execute CI/CD activities and manage the localization and implementation of data models. - Integrate data-driven insights into the Management of Change process and actively participate in the commissioning of new projects. - Collaborate with the Terminal Senior Leadership Team on strategy building workstreams to align advanced analytics with long-term goals. - Assist in the preparation of annual budgets for technical projects, encompassing both expenses and capital allocations. We'll put each as
• . Requirements: - Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Engineering or Data Science are required; an MBA is preferred. - Minimum of 4 years of relevant work experience, including 3+ years in Python software development and data science libraries. - Excellent English communication skills (oral and written); Spanish language skills are helpful. Maybe also "Ability to read and interpret technical specifications, drawings, and regulatory documents." That could be skill. But we can keep Requirements as education/experience and language. Skills: - Extensive experience and mandatory proficiency in Snowflake and Power BI. - Previous experience facilitating and managing process improvement projects using Lean and Six Sigma methodologies. - Experience with CI/CD processes and tooling, as well as database systems management. - Ability to read and interpret technical specifications, drawings, and regulatory documents. - (Maybe also Python etc but that's in requirements.) We need to avoid duplication: Python experience is in Requirements; we could also list under Skills but maybe not needed. We'll keep Python under Requirements. Benefits: - Competitive, market-based compensation package depending on your experience and knowledge. (Actually that's Pay) But we will separate Pay and Benefits. Pay: - Competitive, market-based compensation package depending on your experience and knowledge. Benefits: - Medical / Dental / Vision Insurance. - 401(k) Incentive Savings Plan. - Paid Time Off and Vacations, plus 9 fixed holidays and 2 floating holidays. - Basic and Supplemental Life/AD&D Insurance. - Short Term and Long-Term Disability Insurance. - Tuition Reimbursement. - Great atmosphere! Plenty of freedom, room for initiative, and an engaging environment. - Want to know more about our great work culture? Follow us on Instagram or check out our stories on LinkedIn. (That's more like a call to action; maybe we should exclude as it's like application instruction? It's not exactly instruction but it's promotional. Might be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO etc. But it's a call to follow social media. Might be considered not essential. The instruction says remove application instructions. This is not exactly application instruction but it's a call to follow social media. Could be considered boilerplate? I'd lean to exclude it as it's not substantive job content. Also "Don’t meet all our criteria? No problem! If this role energizes you and our culture feels like a good fit, we warmly invite you to apply anyway." That's also encouragement to apply; maybe we should exclude as it's application encouragement. The instruction says remove application instructions. That line is encouraging to apply; could be considered application instruction. Safer to exclude. Thus Benefits list excludes the social media and encouragement lines. We also have "Work Environment", "Physical Demands", "Work Eligibility", "Inclusion & Diversity", "Accommodations". Those are not in the allowed heading list; we could either omit them or include them under a generic heading? The instruction says use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says "use

  for section headings (e.g ...)". It implies we should use those headings for sections. It doesn't say we cannot add other headings, but to follow the pattern we likely should stick to those. The content like Work Environment etc might be considered boilerplate? Not exactly EEO but still maybe considered standard sections. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. Work Environment etc are not those. However they are not in the list of suggested headings; but we could still include them as

  if we want to preserve all substantive information. The instruction says "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we should keep that info. But we need to decide how to format them. The instruction says use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't say we cannot use other headings, but the examples are those. It might be expected to only use those headings. However the instruction also says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So we could create sections for Work Environment etc using

  if they have specific content. But the examples list didn't include them, but they said e.g., meaning examples, not exhaustive. So we could add headings like Work Environment, Physical Demands, etc. However the instruction also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we might want to avoid many thin sections. Work Environment, Physical Demands, Work Eligibility,