Cyber Review Manager
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences.
We need to extract substantive content: The posting includes:
- Intro paragraph: "At Epiq, your work contributes to complex, global legal outcomes. You’ll join a values‑driven community where integrity guides decisions, relentless service sets the bar, and we thrive on big challenges together. We invest in your growth with enterprise‑wide learning and mobility. We celebrate who you are, and we respect life beyond work with flexibility that’s recognized externally. Enabled by modern platforms and AI, you’ll do the most meaningful work of your career and see your impact at scale."
- Job Description: Position Summary: "Epiq’s Cyber Incident Response group is responsible for managing and overseeing review of data exfiltrated in cyber incidents to identify, extract, and report on the individuals whose personal identifying information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) were compromised. The Review Manager must have a general understanding of data entry, document review, and project management. The Review Manager must be consultative and able to interface with clients and partners, including, corporations, law firms, forensics vendors, and insurers. The Review Manager must be able to effectively maintain a caseload including multiple active matters. Cyber specific review management experience is not necessary."
- Primary Responsibilities: list of bullet points (the text after "Primary Responsibilities" includes many sentences each starting with a verb). We need to turn them into
- .
- Qualifications: list of bullet points after "Qualifications". Also includes "Minimum 2 years of project or review management experience." etc.
- The Compensation range: "The Compensation range for this role is $105,000 -$120,000 USD annually and may be eligible for an annual bonus. Your specific salary will be determined based on several factors: Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities in relation to the job specificationPerformance during screening and interviewPay parity with the wider team in the considered location Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call with the Talent Acquisition Team."
Thus we have Pay info. Should we create a Pay section? The instruction says: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The posting states compensation range, so we can include a Pay section. Benefits: there is a line "Click Here To Learn About Epiq's Benefits." That's a link to benefits but not actual benefits description. The instruction says we should not create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It only mentions a link, not actual benefits details. So we should not create a Benefits section. Schedule: not mentioned, so no Schedule.
We also have a lot of leadership compass text after "Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call with the Talent Acquisition Team." Then there is a block about "Epiq Leadership Compass Builds Talented Teams ..." That seems like generic corporate values, maybe boilerplate? It's not directly about the job. It might be considered boilerplate? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The leadership compass might be considered generic marketing fluff, but it's not explicitly listed as boilerplate to remove. However, it's not specific to the role; it's generic company values. The instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." It might be okay to include as part of "About the role" or maybe we can omit as it's not directly about the role. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The leadership compass is substantive? It's about company values but not specific to the role. Might be considered boilerplate? Not sure. Safer to include it as part of "About the role" or maybe as a separate section "About Epiq". But the allowed headings list includes "About the role". We could put the intro paragraph and leadership compass under About the role. However, the leadership compass is quite long and includes many bullet-like sentences but not formatted as list. Could be turned into
. It's not a list.
We also have EEO statement at the end: "It is Epiq’s policy to comply with all applicable equal employment opportunity laws..." That's boilerplate to remove per instruction. So we must remove that.
Also there is a line about accommodation request etc. That's also EEO/legal boilerplate, remove.
Thus final HTML should have sections: About the role (intro + position summary?), Responsibilities (list), Qualifications (list), Pay (compensation). Possibly also "Requirements" vs "Qualifications"? The posting uses "Qualifications". We'll use that heading.
We need to ensure we don't repeat job title as heading. No job title given explicitly but we can ignore.
We need to use
for each section heading.
We need to use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So for Responsibilities and Qualifications we need lists.
We need to preserve all substantive information: we must not lose any detail from responsibilities and qualifications.
Let's extract responsibilities list exactly as sentences:
From "Primary Responsibilities" paragraph:
- Serve as primary point of contact for clients during cyber incident response review projects.
- Conduct project design meetings and consult with clients on the development and implementation of efficient and effective workflows for data mining and capture related to data exfiltration.
- Determine and manage client expectations regarding deliverables and timeframes.
- Draft workflow protocols and substantive training guidelines in partnership with the client and counsel, including the review and data capture related to large documents unable to be captured within standard review tools.
- Implement review workflows, including the creation of assignments, fields, choices, rules, and access security.
- Leverage the appropriate technology to improve productivity and accuracy.
- Execute quality control and quality assurance best practices, including the use of statistical sampling, advanced searching techniques, and application of custom scripts.
- Communicate and document substantive issues to client and counsel through the creation and maintenance of a query log.
- Monitor and report daily on overall progress, productivity, and accuracy of the project and individual team members, including performance to budget.
- Lead and motivate review teams comprised of both attorneys and non-attorneys.
- Train reviewers on the use of review platforms, including the identification and mentoring of team leaders.
- Work with both US and Global review teams and clients.
We need to ensure we keep each as separate
- .
Qualifications list:
From "Qualifications" paragraph:
- Minimum 2 years of project or review management experience.
- Extensive experience with the administration of review databases, including Relativity.
- Proficient with Microsoft Office, particularly Excel and the use of formulas, pivot tables, and basic formatting.
- Exceptional verbal and written communication skills, including experience leading conference calls and meetings with colleagues and clients.
- Excellent issue spotting and problem-solving skills.
- Ability to manage multiple projects simultaneously.
- Experience with delivering difficult projects on time and within budget.
- Strong organizational skills and attention to detail.
- Willingness to go above and beyond client expectations.
We need to keep each as
- .
Pay section: we need to include the compensation range and details about salary determination. The text: "The Compensation range for this role is $105,000 -$120,000 USD annually and may be eligible for an annual bonus. Your specific salary will be determined based on several factors: Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities in relation to the job specificationPerformance during screening and interviewPay parity with the wider team in the considered location Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call with the Talent Acquisition Team."
Note there are missing spaces after colons: "Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities..." Should we preserve exactly? Probably we should keep as is but maybe add a space for readability? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Adding a space could be considered inventing? It's a minor formatting fix but not changing meaning. Safer to keep exactly as given, but it's hard to read. However, we can keep the text as is; it's still substantive. We'll wrap in
.
About the role section: combine the introductory paragraph and the Position Summary. The Position Summary is part of job description. We'll include both as prose under About the role.
Thus:
About the role
At Epiq, your work contributes to complex, global legal outcomes. You’ll join a values‑driven community where integrity guides decisions, relentless service sets the bar, and we thrive on big challenges together. We invest in your growth with enterprise‑wide learning and mobility. We celebrate who you are, and we respect life beyond work with flexibility that’s recognized externally. Enabled by modern platforms and AI, you’ll do the most meaningful work of your career and see your impact at scale.
Epiq’s Cyber Incident Response group is responsible for managing and overseeing review of data exfiltrated in cyber incidents to identify, extract, and report on the individuals whose personal identifying information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) were compromised. The Review Manager must have a general understanding of data entry, document review, and project management. The Review Manager must be consultative and able to interface with clients and partners, including, corporations, law firms, forensics vendors, and insurers. The Review Manager must be able to effectively maintain a caseload including multiple active matters. Cyber specific review management experience is not necessary.
Then Responsibilities:
Responsibilities
- Serve as primary point of contact for clients during cyber incident response review projects.
- Conduct project design meetings and consult with clients on the development and implementation of efficient and effective workflows for data mining and capture related to data exfiltration.
- Determine and manage client expectations regarding deliverables and timeframes.
- Draft workflow protocols and substantive training guidelines in partnership with the client and counsel, including the review and data capture related to large documents unable to be captured within standard review tools.
- Implement review workflows, including the creation of assignments, fields, choices, rules, and access security.
- Leverage the appropriate technology to improve productivity and accuracy.
- Execute quality control and quality assurance best practices, including the use of statistical sampling, advanced searching techniques, and application of custom scripts.
- Communicate and document substantive issues to client and counsel through the creation and maintenance of a query log.
- Monitor and report daily on overall progress, productivity, and accuracy of the project and individual team members, including performance to budget.
- Lead and motivate review teams comprised of both attorneys and non-attorneys.
- Train reviewers on the use of review platforms, including the identification and mentoring of team leaders.
- Work with both
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. We need to extract substantive content: The posting includes: - Intro paragraph: "At Epiq, your work contributes to complex, global legal outcomes. You’ll join a values‑driven community where integrity guides decisions, relentless service sets the bar, and we thrive on big challenges together. We invest in your growth with enterprise‑wide learning and mobility. We celebrate who you are, and we respect life beyond work with flexibility that’s recognized externally. Enabled by modern platforms and AI, you’ll do the most meaningful work of your career and see your impact at scale." - Job Description: Position Summary: "Epiq’s Cyber Incident Response group is responsible for managing and overseeing review of data exfiltrated in cyber incidents to identify, extract, and report on the individuals whose personal identifying information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) were compromised. The Review Manager must have a general understanding of data entry, document review, and project management. The Review Manager must be consultative and able to interface with clients and partners, including, corporations, law firms, forensics vendors, and insurers. The Review Manager must be able to effectively maintain a caseload including multiple active matters. Cyber specific review management experience is not necessary." - Primary Responsibilities: list of bullet points (the text after "Primary Responsibilities" includes many sentences each starting with a verb). We need to turn them into
- .
- Qualifications: list of bullet points after "Qualifications". Also includes "Minimum 2 years of project or review management experience." etc.
- The Compensation range: "The Compensation range for this role is $105,000 -$120,000 USD annually and may be eligible for an annual bonus. Your specific salary will be determined based on several factors: Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities in relation to the job specificationPerformance during screening and interviewPay parity with the wider team in the considered location Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call with the Talent Acquisition Team."
Thus we have Pay info. Should we create a Pay section? The instruction says: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The posting states compensation range, so we can include a Pay section. Benefits: there is a line "Click Here To Learn About Epiq's Benefits." That's a link to benefits but not actual benefits description. The instruction says we should not create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It only mentions a link, not actual benefits details. So we should not create a Benefits section. Schedule: not mentioned, so no Schedule.
We also have a lot of leadership compass text after "Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call with the Talent Acquisition Team." Then there is a block about "Epiq Leadership Compass Builds Talented Teams ..." That seems like generic corporate values, maybe boilerplate? It's not directly about the job. It might be considered boilerplate? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The leadership compass might be considered generic marketing fluff, but it's not explicitly listed as boilerplate to remove. However, it's not specific to the role; it's generic company values. The instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." It might be okay to include as part of "About the role" or maybe we can omit as it's not directly about the role. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The leadership compass is substantive? It's about company values but not specific to the role. Might be considered boilerplate? Not sure. Safer to include it as part of "About the role" or maybe as a separate section "About Epiq". But the allowed headings list includes "About the role". We could put the intro paragraph and leadership compass under About the role. However, the leadership compass is quite long and includes many bullet-like sentences but not formatted as list. Could be turned into
. It's not a list. We also have EEO statement at the end: "It is Epiq’s policy to comply with all applicable equal employment opportunity laws..." That's boilerplate to remove per instruction. So we must remove that. Also there is a line about accommodation request etc. That's also EEO/legal boilerplate, remove. Thus final HTML should have sections: About the role (intro + position summary?), Responsibilities (list), Qualifications (list), Pay (compensation). Possibly also "Requirements" vs "Qualifications"? The posting uses "Qualifications". We'll use that heading. We need to ensure we don't repeat job title as heading. No job title given explicitly but we can ignore. We need to use
for each section heading. We need to use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So for Responsibilities and Qualifications we need lists. We need to preserve all substantive information: we must not lose any detail from responsibilities and qualifications. Let's extract responsibilities list exactly as sentences: From "Primary Responsibilities" paragraph: - Serve as primary point of contact for clients during cyber incident response review projects. - Conduct project design meetings and consult with clients on the development and implementation of efficient and effective workflows for data mining and capture related to data exfiltration. - Determine and manage client expectations regarding deliverables and timeframes. - Draft workflow protocols and substantive training guidelines in partnership with the client and counsel, including the review and data capture related to large documents unable to be captured within standard review tools. - Implement review workflows, including the creation of assignments, fields, choices, rules, and access security. - Leverage the appropriate technology to improve productivity and accuracy. - Execute quality control and quality assurance best practices, including the use of statistical sampling, advanced searching techniques, and application of custom scripts. - Communicate and document substantive issues to client and counsel through the creation and maintenance of a query log. - Monitor and report daily on overall progress, productivity, and accuracy of the project and individual team members, including performance to budget. - Lead and motivate review teams comprised of both attorneys and non-attorneys. - Train reviewers on the use of review platforms, including the identification and mentoring of team leaders. - Work with both US and Global review teams and clients. We need to ensure we keep each as separate
- . Qualifications list: From "Qualifications" paragraph: - Minimum 2 years of project or review management experience. - Extensive experience with the administration of review databases, including Relativity. - Proficient with Microsoft Office, particularly Excel and the use of formulas, pivot tables, and basic formatting. - Exceptional verbal and written communication skills, including experience leading conference calls and meetings with colleagues and clients. - Excellent issue spotting and problem-solving skills. - Ability to manage multiple projects simultaneously. - Experience with delivering difficult projects on time and within budget. - Strong organizational skills and attention to detail. - Willingness to go above and beyond client expectations. We need to keep each as
- .
Pay section: we need to include the compensation range and details about salary determination. The text: "The Compensation range for this role is $105,000 -$120,000 USD annually and may be eligible for an annual bonus. Your specific salary will be determined based on several factors: Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities in relation to the job specificationPerformance during screening and interviewPay parity with the wider team in the considered location Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call with the Talent Acquisition Team."
Note there are missing spaces after colons: "Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities..." Should we preserve exactly? Probably we should keep as is but maybe add a space for readability? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Adding a space could be considered inventing? It's a minor formatting fix but not changing meaning. Safer to keep exactly as given, but it's hard to read. However, we can keep the text as is; it's still substantive. We'll wrap in
. About the role section: combine the introductory paragraph and the Position Summary. The Position Summary is part of job description. We'll include both as prose under About the role. Thus:
About the role
At Epiq, your work contributes to complex, global legal outcomes. You’ll join a values‑driven community where integrity guides decisions, relentless service sets the bar, and we thrive on big challenges together. We invest in your growth with enterprise‑wide learning and mobility. We celebrate who you are, and we respect life beyond work with flexibility that’s recognized externally. Enabled by modern platforms and AI, you’ll do the most meaningful work of your career and see your impact at scale.
Epiq’s Cyber Incident Response group is responsible for managing and overseeing review of data exfiltrated in cyber incidents to identify, extract, and report on the individuals whose personal identifying information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) were compromised. The Review Manager must have a general understanding of data entry, document review, and project management. The Review Manager must be consultative and able to interface with clients and partners, including, corporations, law firms, forensics vendors, and insurers. The Review Manager must be able to effectively maintain a caseload including multiple active matters. Cyber specific review management experience is not necessary.
Then Responsibilities:Responsibilities
- Serve as primary point of contact for clients during cyber incident response review projects.
- Conduct project design meetings and consult with clients on the development and implementation of efficient and effective workflows for data mining and capture related to data exfiltration.
- Determine and manage client expectations regarding deliverables and timeframes.
- Draft workflow protocols and substantive training guidelines in partnership with the client and counsel, including the review and data capture related to large documents unable to be captured within standard review tools.
- Implement review workflows, including the creation of assignments, fields, choices, rules, and access security.
- Leverage the appropriate technology to improve productivity and accuracy.
- Execute quality control and quality assurance best practices, including the use of statistical sampling, advanced searching techniques, and application of custom scripts.
- Communicate and document substantive issues to client and counsel through the creation and maintenance of a query log.
- Monitor and report daily on overall progress, productivity, and accuracy of the project and individual team members, including performance to budget.
- Lead and motivate review teams comprised of both attorneys and non-attorneys.
- Train reviewers on the use of review platforms, including the identification and mentoring of team leaders.
- Work with both