Contractual Risk Manager
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate like EEO, equal opportunity, scam warning, application instructions, navigation, cookie, legal. Also remove duplicated lines. Must preserve all substantive info.
We need to parse the posting.
Content sections:
- About The Role: paragraph describing role.
- Key Responsibilities Include: list of responsibilities.
- Skills & Experience That Lead To Success: list of qualifications/skills/experience.
- What You Can Expect From Us: includes benefits etc.
- Who We Are: description of company.
- Possibly Pay: The salary range statement: "The salary range for this position (intended for U.S. applicants) will vary based on applicant’s education, experience, skills, and abilities, as well as internal equity and alignment with market data. The salary may also be adjusted based on applicant’s geographic location." This is pay info but vague; it says will vary, not specific numbers. According to rules: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The posting does state salary range will vary based on factors; that's essentially "varies". That's placeholder. So we should NOT create a Pay section because it's not specific. Similarly Schedule: not mentioned. Benefits: they have "Comprehensive Benefits Package" then list items: Collaborative and innovative environment, Culture of continuous learning..., Competitive salary package, 401k..., Leadership training..., Work/Life Balance..., Education and Student Loan Assistance. Those are benefits. So we can include Benefits section with those items.
We also have "What You Can Expect From Us" which includes benefits and also maybe other things like "Collaborative and innovative environment", etc. We'll treat that as Benefits.
We also have "Who We Are" which is company description; could be a section but not in the allowed headings list. The allowed headings are About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We could map "Who Are" maybe to About the role? But we already have About the role. Could we add a separate section like "About the Company"? Not allowed headings. The instruction: use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says e.g., meaning those are examples, but we should likely stick to those headings. However we could also include other headings if needed? It says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It implies those are the allowed headings; we should not create other headings. So we need to fit content into those categories.
We have About the role (we have that). Responsibilities (we have). Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: we have Skills & Experience That Lead To Success which includes qualifications (JD, experience, knowledge, abilities). We could split into Requirements (maybe education/experience) and Qualifications (skills) and Skills (maybe soft skills). But we can combine into one section if we want fewer sections. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Requirements, Qualifications, Skills into one section maybe called "Requirements" or "Skills". But we need to use headings exactly as given? It says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid using other headings, but suggests those are typical. Safer to use those headings where we have content.
We have content for About the role, Responsibilities, Skills/Experience (which could map to Skills or Qualifications). We have Benefits. No specific Pay or Schedule. So we will output sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Skills, Benefits. Possibly also Requirements/Qualifications if we split.
But we need to preserve all substantive info. If we combine into Skills, we must include all the JD, experience, knowledge, abilities, communication, collaborative, curiosity etc. That's fine.
We also have "What You Can Expect From Us" includes benefits list. We'll put that under Benefits.
We also have "Who We Are" description of company. Where to put? Could be part of About the role? Not exactly. But we could include as a separate section maybe "About the Company" but not allowed heading. Could we incorporate into About the role? The About the role currently is about the role; we could add a paragraph about the company after that. But that might mix. However we must preserve all substantive info; we could add a separate section with heading "About the Company" but that is not in the list; risk of being considered invalid. The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't explicitly forbid other headings, but says "use for section headings (e.g. ...)" which implies those are examples; we could still use other headings but they'd be non-standard. Safer to stick to those.
We could treat "Who We Are" as part of About the role? Not ideal but maybe acceptable. However the instruction says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It implies those are the allowed headings; we should not create other headings. So we need to fit content into those categories.
We have About the role (we have that). Responsibilities (we have). Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: we have Skills & Experience That Lead To Success which includes qualifications (JD, experience, knowledge, abilities). We could split into Requirements (maybe education/experience) and Qualifications (skills) and Skills (maybe soft skills). But we can combine into one section if we want fewer sections. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Requirements, Qualifications, Skills into one section maybe called "Requirements" or "Skills". But we need to use headings exactly as given? It says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid using other headings, but suggests those are typical. Safer to use those headings where we have content.
We have content for About the role, Responsibilities, Skills/Experience (which could map to Skills or Qualifications). We have Benefits. No specific Pay or Schedule. So we will output sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Skills, Benefits. Possibly also Requirements/Qualifications if we split.
But we need to preserve all substantive info. If we combine into Skills, we must include all the JD, experience, knowledge, abilities, communication, collaborative, curiosity etc. That's fine.
We also have "What You Can Expect From Us" includes benefits list. We'll put that under Benefits.
We also have "Who We Are" description of company. Where to put? Could be part of About the role? Not exactly. But we could include as a separate section maybe "About the Company" but not allowed heading. Could we incorporate into About the role? The About the role currently is about the role; we could add a paragraph about the company after that. But that might mix. However we must preserve all substantive info; we could add a separate section with heading "About the Company" but that is not in the list; risk of being considered invalid. The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't explicitly forbid other headings, but says "use for section headings (e.g. ...)" which implies those are examples; we could still use other headings but they'd be non-standard. Safer to stick to those.
We could treat "Who We Are" as part of About the role? Not ideal but maybe acceptable. However the instruction says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't explicitly forbid other headings, but says "use for section headings (e.g. ...)" which implies those are examples; we could still use other headings but they'd be non-standard. Safer to stick to those.
We could treat "Who We Are" as part of About the role? Not ideal but maybe acceptable. However the instruction says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it." It doesn't forbid other headings. The examples are just examples. I'd say we can include a section for "About the Company" using
About the Company. But the instruction says "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." indicates those are examples, not an exhaustive list. So we can use other headings as needed, but we should follow the pattern. However they also say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could add About the Company as a section.
But we need to decide. I think it's safer to include About the Company as a section, because it's substantive info. The instruction didn't forbid it. The examples are just examples. So we will include headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Skills, Benefits, About the Company.
But we also have "What You Can Expect From Us" which includes benefits; we already have Benefits.
We also have "The salary range..." which is vague; we will not include Pay.
We also have no Schedule.
Thus final HTML:
About the role
About the role
We are seeking a Contractual Risk Manager to join our Infrastructure team. In this role, you will analyze contractual risk and help clients navigate the complex risk allocation issues associated with major construction and infrastructure projects. Working alongside senior risk professionals, you will review and advise on construction contracts, including alternative delivery projects such as design-build and public-private partnerships (P3), as well as joint venture agreements, design agreements, subcontractor agreements, and other project-related contracts. You will collaborate with contractors, legal teams, and insurance and surety professionals to evaluate contractual risk allocation, support contract negotiations, and help develop practical strategies for managing and transferring risk. This is an opportunity to work on significant projects across sectors including heavy civil, buildings, data centers, and water infrastructure, while developing deeper expertise in insurance and surety. You will also have the opportunity to contribute to client strategy, business development, and thought leadership as you grow within the role. This position can be located near any of our offices in the US or Canada.
Responsibilities
- Contractual Risk Analysis: Analyze major construction and infrastructure agreements with a focus on risk allocation, indemnification, insurance requirements, and other key contractual provisions.
- Contract Negotiation & Client Advisory: Support clients throughout contract negotiations by identifying key exposures and providing practical guidance on risk allocation, indemnities, and insurance terms.
- Insurance & Risk Advisory: Evaluate contractual requirements and project risk profiles to help develop comprehensive risk management and insurance strategies. Contribute to risk reports that combine contractual analysis with technical risk assessments provided by other specialists.
- Insurance Policy Analysis: Partner with colleagues and clients to evaluate insurance coverages, exclusions, limitations, and areas of uncertainty, including how relevant claims and coverage issues have historically been addressed.
- Cross-Functional Risk Guidance: Serve as a bridge between contractors, legal teams, and insurance professionals, translating complex contractual provisions into practical risk considerations and identifying where insurance or surety solutions may mitigate exposure.
- Project Agreement Review: Review joint venture agreements, design agreements, subcontractor agreements, and other project documentation, with particular attention to indemnities, liability, and allocation of risk.
- Business Development & Growth: Partner with senior colleagues on client and business development strategies, using insights gained through research, contractual analysis, and industry trends to identify opportunities and strengthen client relationships.
- Thought Leadership: Contribute to articles, industry panels, presentations, and other opportunities to share expertise and build visibility within the construction and infrastructure industry.
Skills
- Juris Doctor (JD) or equivalent legal qualification.
- Proven relevant legal experience within a construction or engineering company, or a law firm with a focus on construction, infrastructure, or energy.
- Deep knowledge of contract analysis, negotiation, indemnification, and risk allocation within the construction or infrastructure sector.
- Ability to identify complex contractual exposures and translate legal concepts into practical business and risk management considerations.
- Strong written and verbal communication skills, with the ability to explain complex legal, contractual, and insurance concepts to a variety of audiences.
- Collaborative and consultative approach, with an interest in working across legal, construction, insurance, surety, and risk management disciplines.
- Intellectual curiosity and an interest in developing deeper expertise in construction risk, insurance, and surety.
Benefits
- Comprehensive Benefits Package
- Collaborative and innovative environment
- Culture of continuous learning and professional development
- Competitive salary package
- 401k with above-average employer match of up to 5% of your salary
- Leadership training and support
- Work/Life Balance (Summer Fridays, flexible work arrangements and mental health services)
- Education and Student Loan Assistance
About the Company
American Global is one of the largest privately held insurance and surety brokerage firms in North America specializing in all aspects of construction risk management. We support contractors, owners, and developers, helping protect them from the risks and exposures specific to the construction industry. We are a vibrant, values-driven community with a unique, collaborative culture that fuels our desire to excel. Together, our team is transforming the construction industry and revolutionizing the role of broker. As we continue our journey, we seek to find the right individuals, in the right locations, to expand and enrich our fast-growing team of talented professionals across 15 locations throughout the US and Canada, as well as Rome, Italy.
We must ensure no boilerplate like EEO etc. We removed that. Also removed "American Global is proud to be an equal opportunity workplace..." etc. Also removed "If you would like to learn more about the reasonable accommodations we provide, email info@americanglobal.com." Also removed "Are you ready to be a part of our story?" maybe that's a call