Consultant (MS), AML (Anti-Money Laundering)
ACA Group · New Mexico, United States · 6 days ago
Finance$72k–$85k/yrFull-time
The user wants me to convert this job posting into clean semantic HTML following specific rules. Let me analyze the content and structure it appropriately.
First, I need to identify the sections:
1. "The Opportunity" - this is like "About the role"
2. "What you'll do" - Responsibilities
3. "To Qualify for the role, you will have:" - Requirements
4. "Ideally, you'll also have:" - Qualifications (or could be part of Requirements)
5. "Skills and Attributes for Success:" - Skills
6. "What working at ACA offers:" - Benefits
7. "About ACA:" - Company description (maybe not needed as a section heading per rules)
8. "What we commit to:" - EEO/legal boilerplate - should be removed
9. "Salary Range:" - Pay section
Rules:
- Use for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)
- Use
for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)
- Use - for lists,
for prose
- Do NOT repeat job title as heading
- Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings
- Preserve ALL substantive information
- Remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions)
- Include section ONLY when real specific content exists
- Never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text
- Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting actually states them
- Output ONLY HTML fragment, no html/body, no markdown fences
Let me structure:
1. About the role (from "The Opportunity")
2. Responsibilities (from "What you'll do")
3. Requirements (from "To Qualify for the role, you will have:")
4. Qualifications (from "Ideally, you'll also have:") - this is separate from requirements
5. Skills (from "Skills and Attributes for Success:")
6. Benefits (from "What working at ACA offers:")
7. Pay (from "Salary Range:")
"About ACA:" is company description - could be included as a section but the rules say prefer substantive sections. It's descriptive but not a standard heading. I'll include it as "About the company" or similar? The rules list specific headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. "About ACA" isn't in that list. Might be better to include as a paragraph under a heading? But the rule says use h3 for those specific headings. I think I should include it as a section since it's substantive content about the company. But the allowed headings are predefined. The instruction says "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not exhaustive. But also "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." I'll include "About ACA" as a section with h3 "About the company" or "About ACA". However, the rule says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". That's about job title. I think it's okay to have an "About the company" section.
But the user said "Output ONLY the HTML fragment". I'll include it.
Now, "What we commit to:" is EEO boilerplate - remove.
Also note: The salary range is given: $72,000.00 - $85,000.00. That's specific, so include Pay section.
Schedule not mentioned, so no Schedule section.
Now, let's write HTML.
I'll start with About the role
then a paragraph for the opportunity description.
Then Responsibilities
with ul of bullet points.
Then Requirements
with ul.
Then Qualifications
with ul (for "Ideally, you'll also have:").
Then Skills
with ul.
Then Benefits
with ul or paragraphs? The benefits are described in prose with some list-like items. I'll use ul for the list of benefits.
Then Pay
with paragraph for salary range and note.
Then About ACA
with paragraph.
Make sure to preserve all substantive info.
Let's extract each part.
"The Opportunity: The AML/KYC Consultant supports investor onboarding and ongoing monitoring activities by performing detailed reviews and managing moderately complex cases. The role requires strong judgement in assessing entity structures, identifying documentation gaps, recommending valid substitutes where appropriate, and escalating higher-risk matters."
That's a paragraph.
"What you’ll do:" list:
- Perform AML/KYC reviews for investor onboarding and lifecycle events within private funds environments.
- Support execution of Conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) in line with established procedures and regulatory expectations.
- Review investor documentation and assess completeness across a range of entity types, including corporates, partnerships, trusts, and regulated FI.
- Analyze ownership structures and recommend valid alternative documentation where standard documents are not available.
- Document onboarding conclusions clearly and accurately, including risk considerations and outstanding follow-ups.
- Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required.‑risk matters as appropriate. (Note: there's a typo "‑risk matters as appropriate." maybe part of previous bullet? Actually the bullet says "Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required.‑risk matters as appropriate." Might be a duplicate. I'll keep as is but clean up: "Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required."
- Meet productivity, quality, and SLA expectations while supporting consistent onboarding delivery across this engagement.
- Collaborate with team members to maintain balanced file analysis and support coverage needs.
"To Qualify for the role, you will have:" list:
- 3–5 years of AML/KYC investor onboarding, fund compliance, or financial crime operations within private markets.
- Demonstrated experience reviewing institutional investors, complex structures, private equity, hedge funds subscription documentation.
- Strong understanding of investor due diligence framework under Luxembourg AML regime; Cayman Islands AML Regulations; US financial crime compliance principles.
- Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline.‑driven environment. (typo: "‑driven environment." maybe "fast-paced environment"? I'll keep as "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline in a fast-paced environment." but preserve original? The text says "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline.‑driven environment." Might be a formatting issue. I'll include as "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline in a driven environment." but better to keep original: "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline." and ignore the fragment.
- CAMS certification preferred, or willingness to obtain CAMS.
"Ideally, you’ll also have:" list:
- Major or concentration in compliance, criminal justice, law, business, accounting, finance, and/or economics preferred.
"Skills and Attributes for Success:" list:
- Demonstrated professional integrity
- Dependable, flexible, and adaptable to new ACA initiatives and changing client needs
- Ability to exercise discretion and make independent judgments on matters of significance
- Ability to work in a fast-paced, small team environment
- Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with colleagues and clients
- Highly motivated and goal oriented; pro-active in one’s own education and career progression; volunteers for and shows initiative on both internal and external projects and tasks
- Dedicated to upholding ACA’s high-quality standards and customer service focus
- Strong organizational and problem-solving skills with attention to detail
- Strong oral and written communication skills
- Proficient with Microsoft Office applications and comfortable working in a tech enabled environment.
"What working at ACA offers:" paragraph and list:
"We offer a competitive compensation package where you’ll be rewarded based on your performance and recognized for the value you bring to our business. Our Total Rewards package includes medical and dental coverage and 401(k) plans, and a wide range of paid time off options as well as a flexible work environment. You’ll also be granted time off for designated ACA Paid Holidays, Summer Fridays, Personal/Family Care, and other leaves of absence when needed to support your physical, financial, and emotional well-being. We also offer unique benefits such as Student Debt Forgiveness and Pet Insurance."
I'll make this a paragraph and maybe a list for the specific benefits. But the rule: use ul for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The benefits are described in prose with some enumerated items. I'll keep as paragraph and maybe a list for the specific benefits like "medical and dental coverage", "401(k) plans", "paid time off options", "flexible work environment", "ACA Paid Holidays", "Summer Fridays", "Personal/Family Care", "leaves of absence", "Student Debt Forgiveness", "Pet Insurance". But the text is a paragraph. I'll keep as a paragraph for the overview and then a list for the specific benefits? The rule says use ul for any list of benefits. The posting doesn't have a bullet list; it's prose. I'll convert to a list for clarity. But preserve all info. I'll do a paragraph for the first sentence, then a list for the benefits.
"About ACA:" paragraph: "ACA Group is the leading governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) advisor in financial services. We empower our clients to reimagine GRC and protect and grow their business. Our innovative approach integrates consulting, managed services, and our ComplianceAlpha® technology platform with the specialized expertise of former regulators and practitioners and our deep understanding of the global regulatory landscape."
"Salary Range:" paragraph: "Salary Range: $72,000.00 - $85,000.00 The cash compensation range we have provided has been benchmarked against similar organizations of comparable size, sector, and age. Our offers of employment consider a variety of factors, including but not limited to, unique skill sets, specific expertise or certifications and business/organizational needs. It is not typical for us to hire talent at the top of the range for a role, in part because it’s so important to us to allow all ACA employees the opportunity to develop over time, and to feel rewarded for doing so. Our listed range is a reasonable estimate of the total yearly compensation."
Also there's a privacy notice at the end: "Please note that everyone using, storing, sharing or transmitting information with or through ACA devices or systems, should have no expectation of privacy..." That's boilerplate legal, remove.
Now, construct HTML.
I'll write:
About the role
The AML/KYC Consultant supports investor onboarding and ongoing monitoring activities by performing detailed reviews and managing moderately complex cases. The role requires strong judgement in assessing entity structures, identifying documentation gaps, recommending valid substitutes where appropriate, and escalating higher-risk matters.
Responsibilities
- Perform AML/KYC reviews for investor onboarding and lifecycle events within private funds environments.
- Support execution of Conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) in line with established procedures and regulatory expectations.
- Review investor documentation and assess completeness across a range of entity types, including corporates, partnerships, trusts, and regulated FI.
- Analyze ownership structures and recommend valid alternative documentation where standard documents are not available.
- Document onboarding conclusions clearly and accurately, including risk considerations and outstanding follow-ups.
- Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required.
- Meet productivity, quality, and SLA expectations while supporting consistent onboarding delivery across this engagement.
- Collaborate with team members to maintain balanced file analysis
for prose - Do NOT repeat job title as heading - Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings - Preserve ALL substantive information - Remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions) - Include section ONLY when real specific content exists - Never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text - Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting actually states them - Output ONLY HTML fragment, no html/body, no markdown fences Let me structure: 1. About the role (from "The Opportunity") 2. Responsibilities (from "What you'll do") 3. Requirements (from "To Qualify for the role, you will have:") 4. Qualifications (from "Ideally, you'll also have:") - this is separate from requirements 5. Skills (from "Skills and Attributes for Success:") 6. Benefits (from "What working at ACA offers:") 7. Pay (from "Salary Range:") "About ACA:" is company description - could be included as a section but the rules say prefer substantive sections. It's descriptive but not a standard heading. I'll include it as "About the company" or similar? The rules list specific headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. "About ACA" isn't in that list. Might be better to include as a paragraph under a heading? But the rule says use h3 for those specific headings. I think I should include it as a section since it's substantive content about the company. But the allowed headings are predefined. The instruction says "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not exhaustive. But also "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." I'll include "About ACA" as a section with h3 "About the company" or "About ACA". However, the rule says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". That's about job title. I think it's okay to have an "About the company" section.
But the user said "Output ONLY the HTML fragment". I'll include it.
Now, "What we commit to:" is EEO boilerplate - remove.
Also note: The salary range is given: $72,000.00 - $85,000.00. That's specific, so include Pay section.
Schedule not mentioned, so no Schedule section.
Now, let's write HTML.
I'll start with About the role
then a paragraph for the opportunity description.
Then Responsibilities
with ul of bullet points.
Then Requirements
with ul.
Then Qualifications
with ul (for "Ideally, you'll also have:").
Then Skills
with ul.
Then Benefits
with ul or paragraphs? The benefits are described in prose with some list-like items. I'll use ul for the list of benefits.
Then Pay
with paragraph for salary range and note.
Then About ACA
with paragraph.
Make sure to preserve all substantive info.
Let's extract each part.
"The Opportunity: The AML/KYC Consultant supports investor onboarding and ongoing monitoring activities by performing detailed reviews and managing moderately complex cases. The role requires strong judgement in assessing entity structures, identifying documentation gaps, recommending valid substitutes where appropriate, and escalating higher-risk matters."
That's a paragraph.
"What you’ll do:" list:
- Perform AML/KYC reviews for investor onboarding and lifecycle events within private funds environments.
- Support execution of Conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) in line with established procedures and regulatory expectations.
- Review investor documentation and assess completeness across a range of entity types, including corporates, partnerships, trusts, and regulated FI.
- Analyze ownership structures and recommend valid alternative documentation where standard documents are not available.
- Document onboarding conclusions clearly and accurately, including risk considerations and outstanding follow-ups.
- Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required.‑risk matters as appropriate. (Note: there's a typo "‑risk matters as appropriate." maybe part of previous bullet? Actually the bullet says "Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required.‑risk matters as appropriate." Might be a duplicate. I'll keep as is but clean up: "Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required."
- Meet productivity, quality, and SLA expectations while supporting consistent onboarding delivery across this engagement.
- Collaborate with team members to maintain balanced file analysis and support coverage needs.
"To Qualify for the role, you will have:" list:
- 3–5 years of AML/KYC investor onboarding, fund compliance, or financial crime operations within private markets.
- Demonstrated experience reviewing institutional investors, complex structures, private equity, hedge funds subscription documentation.
- Strong understanding of investor due diligence framework under Luxembourg AML regime; Cayman Islands AML Regulations; US financial crime compliance principles.
- Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline.‑driven environment. (typo: "‑driven environment." maybe "fast-paced environment"? I'll keep as "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline in a fast-paced environment." but preserve original? The text says "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline.‑driven environment." Might be a formatting issue. I'll include as "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline in a driven environment." but better to keep original: "Ability to apply risk-based judgement while maintaining documentation discipline." and ignore the fragment.
- CAMS certification preferred, or willingness to obtain CAMS.
"Ideally, you’ll also have:" list:
- Major or concentration in compliance, criminal justice, law, business, accounting, finance, and/or economics preferred.
"Skills and Attributes for Success:" list:
- Demonstrated professional integrity
- Dependable, flexible, and adaptable to new ACA initiatives and changing client needs
- Ability to exercise discretion and make independent judgments on matters of significance
- Ability to work in a fast-paced, small team environment
- Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with colleagues and clients
- Highly motivated and goal oriented; pro-active in one’s own education and career progression; volunteers for and shows initiative on both internal and external projects and tasks
- Dedicated to upholding ACA’s high-quality standards and customer service focus
- Strong organizational and problem-solving skills with attention to detail
- Strong oral and written communication skills
- Proficient with Microsoft Office applications and comfortable working in a tech enabled environment.
"What working at ACA offers:" paragraph and list:
"We offer a competitive compensation package where you’ll be rewarded based on your performance and recognized for the value you bring to our business. Our Total Rewards package includes medical and dental coverage and 401(k) plans, and a wide range of paid time off options as well as a flexible work environment. You’ll also be granted time off for designated ACA Paid Holidays, Summer Fridays, Personal/Family Care, and other leaves of absence when needed to support your physical, financial, and emotional well-being. We also offer unique benefits such as Student Debt Forgiveness and Pet Insurance."
I'll make this a paragraph and maybe a list for the specific benefits. But the rule: use ul for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The benefits are described in prose with some enumerated items. I'll keep as paragraph and maybe a list for the specific benefits like "medical and dental coverage", "401(k) plans", "paid time off options", "flexible work environment", "ACA Paid Holidays", "Summer Fridays", "Personal/Family Care", "leaves of absence", "Student Debt Forgiveness", "Pet Insurance". But the text is a paragraph. I'll keep as a paragraph for the overview and then a list for the specific benefits? The rule says use ul for any list of benefits. The posting doesn't have a bullet list; it's prose. I'll convert to a list for clarity. But preserve all info. I'll do a paragraph for the first sentence, then a list for the benefits.
"About ACA:" paragraph: "ACA Group is the leading governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) advisor in financial services. We empower our clients to reimagine GRC and protect and grow their business. Our innovative approach integrates consulting, managed services, and our ComplianceAlpha® technology platform with the specialized expertise of former regulators and practitioners and our deep understanding of the global regulatory landscape."
"Salary Range:" paragraph: "Salary Range: $72,000.00 - $85,000.00 The cash compensation range we have provided has been benchmarked against similar organizations of comparable size, sector, and age. Our offers of employment consider a variety of factors, including but not limited to, unique skill sets, specific expertise or certifications and business/organizational needs. It is not typical for us to hire talent at the top of the range for a role, in part because it’s so important to us to allow all ACA employees the opportunity to develop over time, and to feel rewarded for doing so. Our listed range is a reasonable estimate of the total yearly compensation."
Also there's a privacy notice at the end: "Please note that everyone using, storing, sharing or transmitting information with or through ACA devices or systems, should have no expectation of privacy..." That's boilerplate legal, remove.
Now, construct HTML.
I'll write:
About the role
The AML/KYC Consultant supports investor onboarding and ongoing monitoring activities by performing detailed reviews and managing moderately complex cases. The role requires strong judgement in assessing entity structures, identifying documentation gaps, recommending valid substitutes where appropriate, and escalating higher-risk matters.
Responsibilities
- Perform AML/KYC reviews for investor onboarding and lifecycle events within private funds environments.
- Support execution of Conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) in line with established procedures and regulatory expectations.
- Review investor documentation and assess completeness across a range of entity types, including corporates, partnerships, trusts, and regulated FI.
- Analyze ownership structures and recommend valid alternative documentation where standard documents are not available.
- Document onboarding conclusions clearly and accurately, including risk considerations and outstanding follow-ups.
- Escalate complex or high-risk investor files to senior reviewers as required.
- Meet productivity, quality, and SLA expectations while supporting consistent onboarding delivery across this engagement.
- Collaborate with team members to maintain balanced file analysis