Community Engagement Lead, East
- .
- Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: The posting has "About You:" with experience etc. Also "Background:" list. We need to decide how to split into sections. The instruction: prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But we have to use headings exactly as given: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide which content goes where.
We have experience requirements: 8+ years experience navigating local or state political environments, public affairs, government relations, campaigns, or community engagement. Deep understanding of how civic decisions are made... Proven ability to build coalitions... Strong relationships and working familiarity with community organizations, elected officials, government leaders, or other civic stakeholders. Exceptional verbal and written communication skills... High-agency, entrepreneurial operator... Strong judgment and credibility when operating in politically sensitive or high-visibility environments. Experience working with public safety, government technology, or other complex civic issues is highly valuable. Located in NY and willing to work in the office 4 days/week (schedule). Also Background list: possible backgrounds (Chief of Staff, campaign manager, public affairs leader, policy director, community engagement lead). That could be considered as "Qualifications" or "Requirements". We could put the experience and skills under Requirements, and the background examples under Qualifications? Or we could put all under Requirements and leave Qualifications empty (but we must not emit empty heading). So we need to allocate content to both Requirements and Qualifications such that each has substantive content.
We could treat "About You:" as Requirements (experience, skills). And "Background:" as Qualifications (typical backgrounds). Or we could treat "About You:" as Qualifications and "Background:" as Requirements. Either is fine as long as we have content.
We also need Skills section: maybe we can extract specific skills: stakeholder mapping, community listening, coalition building, public meeting preparation, responding to emerging concerns, translating technology, monitoring public discourse, media coverage, stakeholder sentiment, developing communications, building trusted relationships, supporting government partners, cross-functional partnership. Those are more like responsibilities though. But we could pull out skills: exceptional verbal and written communication, ability to translate complex technical concepts, coalition building, stakeholder mapping, community listening, public meeting preparation, crisis communication, relationship building, etc. However we already used many in responsibilities. To avoid duplication, we could keep Skills minimal: maybe list "Exceptional verbal and written communication; ability to translate complex technical concepts into clear narratives; coalition building; stakeholder mapping; community listening; public meeting preparation; relationship building; cross-functional collaboration." But we need to ensure we don't invent content not in posting. The posting does mention those skills implicitly. We can extract from "About You:" and "What You’ll Do:" but we must not invent. We can list skills that are explicitly mentioned: "Exceptional verbal and written communication skills", "Ability to translate complex or technical concepts into clear, compelling narratives", "Strong judgment and credibility when operating in politically sensitive or high-visibility environments", "High-agency, entrepreneurial operator", "Experience working with public safety, government technology, or other complex civic issues". Those are skills/qualities. We can put those under Skills.
Now Requirements: maybe the years of experience and deep understanding etc. Qualifications: the background examples.
Let's map:
About the role: introductory paragraphs (including North Star).
Responsibilities: bullet list from "What You’ll Do:".
Requirements: "8+ years of experience navigating local or state political environments, public affairs, government relations, campaigns, or community engagement. Deep understanding of how civic decisions are made and how initiatives move through city halls, public hearings, and local government processes. Proven ability to build coalitions, navigate high-stakes public conversations, and move complex initiatives toward successful outcomes. Strong relationships and working familiarity with community organizations, elected officials, government leaders, or other civic stakeholders. High-agency, entrepreneurial operator who is comfortable building from scratch and working across functions in a fast-paced, mission-driven environment. Strong judgment and credibility when operating in politically sensitive or high-visibility environments. Experience working with public safety, government technology, or other complex civic issues is highly valuable."
Qualifications: "Background: You may have served as a: Chief of Staff to a mayor, council member, or elected official; Political campaign manager or senior campaign operative; Public affairs or government relations leader; Policy director or senior advisor in local or state government; Community engagement lead on high-visibility civic initiatives."
Skills: "Exceptional verbal and written communication skills, with the ability to translate complex or technical concepts into clear, compelling narratives." Also maybe "Ability to build coalitions, stakeholder mapping, community listening, public meeting preparation, responding to emerging concerns, developing clear fact-based communications, building trusted relationships, cross-functional partnership." But many of those are in responsibilities. To avoid duplication, we can keep Skills limited to communication and translation ability, plus maybe "High-agency, entrepreneurial operator". But that is more a trait. Let's include: "Exceptional verbal and written communication skills; ability to translate complex technical concepts into clear, compelling narratives; high-agency, entrepreneurial operator; strong judgment and credibility in politically sensitive environments." That seems derived from About You.
Pay: "$165,000—$195,000 USD base salary, with potential bonus and equity as applicable."
Schedule: "Located in NY; expected to work in the office 4 days per week."
We should not include Benefits section because no specific benefits listed.
Now ensure we don't repeat job title as heading. We'll not.
We need to output only HTML fragment, no markdown.
We'll use
for each section heading. We'll wrap lists in
- .
We'll use
for prose. Let's craft. Section About the role: combine paragraphs. We'll have:
About the role
Peregrine is seeking a Community Engagement Lead to build and lead the function responsible for how we engage the communities we serve and drive success in the civic arena. As Peregrine’s technology is adopted by state and local governments, decisions about deployment can play out through public hearings, council votes, community conversations, and high-visibility civic debates. This role ensures Peregrine and our government partners are prepared to navigate those moments with credibility, transparency, and trust. This is a founding role with national scope and significant ownership, sitting at the intersection of government affairs, communications, public relations, and go-to-market strategy.
Your North Star: Build the strategy, relationships, and playbooks that help communities understand Peregrine’s work, surface and address legitimate concerns, and build durable public support for successful deployments.
Responsibilities:Responsibilities
- Lead community engagement strategies for Peregrine deployments by mapping civic and political landscapes, identifying key stakeholders and influencers, conducting community listening, and preparing Peregrine and government partners for public meetings and high-visibility moments.
- Build Peregrine’s community engagement playbook by creating scalable approaches for stakeholder mapping, community listening, coalition building, public meeting preparation, and responding to emerging concerns.
- Translate Peregrine’s technology into community value by partnering with Sales, Product, Marketing, and Implementation teams to explain complex technology in clear, accessible language grounded in local priorities and civic values.
- Shape the public narrative around Peregrine’s work by monitoring public discourse, media coverage, and stakeholder sentiment; identifying emerging concerns or misinformation; and developing clear, fact-based communications.
- Build trusted relationships across the civic ecosystem, including community organizations, civil rights advocates, faith leaders, business and economic development groups, public safety leaders, policy influencers, and local media.
- Support government partners through high-stakes civic moments, including public hearings, council votes, community meetings, and other processes that can influence the success of a deployment.
- Partner cross-functionally across Peregrine to ensure community perspectives are incorporated into how we communicate, position, and deploy our technology.
Requirements
- 8+ years of experience navigating local or state political environments, public affairs, government relations, campaigns, or community engagement.
- Deep understanding of how civic decisions are made and how initiatives move through city halls, public hearings, and local government processes.
- Proven ability to build coalitions, navigate high-stakes public conversations, and move complex initiatives toward successful outcomes.
- Strong relationships and working familiarity with community organizations, elected officials, government leaders, or other civic stakeholders.
- High-agency, entrepreneurial operator who is comfortable building from scratch and working across functions in a fast-paced, mission-driven environment.
- Strong judgment and credibility when operating in politically sensitive or high-visibility environments.
- Experience working with public safety, government technology, or other complex civic issues is highly valuable.
Qualifications
- Background: You may have served as a:
- Chief of Staff to a mayor, council member, or elected official
- Political campaign manager or senior campaign operative
- Public affairs or government relations leader
- .
We'll use