Commercial Casualty Underwriting Leader (Director)

The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. I need to follow the rules carefully: 1. Use

for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule) 2. Use

• for lists of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose 3. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) 4. Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it 5. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail 6. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions 7. Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text 8. Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them 9. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones 10. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences Let me analyze the job posting content: The posting has: - Company description ("What We Do", "Our Investors") - Job title: "Commercial Casualty Underwriting Leader (Director)" - "About You" section with requirements/qualifications - "About the Role" section with responsibilities - "Compensation" section with salary range - "How We Work" section with values (appears twice, duplicated) - "Benefits" section (appears twice, duplicated) - Location info: "This is a position based in our New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Los Angeles, or Dallas–Fort Worth offices." I need to structure this into appropriate sections. The rules say to use specific heading names: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Looking at the content: - "About the Role" maps to "About the role" heading - The bullet points under "In this role, you will:" are responsibilities - "About You" contains qualifications/requirements - "Compensation" maps to "Pay" - "Benefits" maps to "Benefits" - "How We Work" could be part of "About the role" or separate, but it's company values - Location info could go in a short

  or under Schedule? But Schedule is for work schedule info, not location. The rules say only include Schedule if posting states it. The posting doesn't mention schedule details (like hours, remote, etc.), just location. So maybe include location in a short

  at the top or under About the role. Also note: The "How We Work" and "Benefits" sections appear duplicated in the text. I should only include them once. I should not include "What We Do" and "Our Investors" as separate sections unless they fit the allowed headings. The allowed headings are: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. "What We Do" is company description, not one of those. I could fold it into a short

  at the beginning or omit? The rules say "Preserve ALL substantive information". But also "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". The company description is substantive. However, the allowed headings are limited. I could include a brief company overview as a

  before the sections, but the output should be only the HTML fragment with sections. The rules say "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It says "e.g.", so maybe other headings are allowed? But then it says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". The company description is real content. But the example headings are those. I think I should stick to those headings. The company description could be a

  under "About the role" or before. But the rules say "Output ONLY the HTML fragment". I'll include a brief company overview as a

  at the start, then the sections. But the rules: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". So I should not have an

  for the job title. The job title is "Commercial Casualty Underwriting Leader (Director)". I'll omit that heading. Now, structure: 1. Brief company overview (from "What We Do" and "Our Investors") as a

  . 2.

  About the role

  with prose from "About the Role" intro paragraph. 3.

  Responsibilities

  with
  • for each bullet under "In this role, you will:". 4.

    Qualifications

    (or Requirements) with
    • for each bullet under "About You". The heading "Qualifications" is in the example list. "Requirements" also. I'll use "Qualifications" as it's more common for "About You". But the example includes both. I'll use "Qualifications". 5.

      Pay

      with compensation details. 6.

      Benefits

      with benefits list. 7. Location info: maybe a

      under "About the role" or separate? The posting says "This is a position based in our New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Los Angeles, or Dallas–Fort Worth offices." That's location, not schedule. Could be a

      at the end or under "About the role". I'll include it as a

      after the sections or within "About the role". Also, "How We Work" values: duplicated. Could be included as part of company culture, but not a required heading. The rules say prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. I could include a "How We Work" section? But not in the example headings. The example headings are: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. "How We Work" is not listed. I could fold it into "About the role" as prose. But it's quite detailed. However, the rules say "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". The posting has real content for "How We Work". But the allowed headings are limited. I think I should not create a custom heading. I'll incorporate the values into "About the role" as a subsection or just include as prose. But the rules say use

      for section headings (e.g. ...). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says "e.g.". However, the instruction: "use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." This suggests those are the expected headings. I'll stick to those. Thus, I'll create sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Pay, Benefits. Possibly Schedule if there's schedule info, but there isn't. Location is not schedule. Now, let's extract content. Company overview: Combine "What We Do" and "Our Investors" into a paragraph. About the role: The paragraph starting "Shepherd's underwriting approach is client-centric..." and the location sentence. Responsibilities: The bullet points under "In this role, you will:". Qualifications: The bullet points under "About You" (the list with numbers). Also note "A bachelor's degree or equivalent experience." is part of that list. Pay: The compensation paragraph. Benefits: The benefits list (from the first Benefits section, ignore duplicate). Now, write HTML. I'll start with a

      for company overview. Then

      About the role

      with

      for the intro paragraph and location. Then

      Responsibilities

      with
      • ... Then

        Qualifications

        with
        • ... Then

          Pay

          with

          for compensation details. Then

          Benefits

          with
          • ... Make sure to remove duplicates: "How We Work" appears twice, "Benefits" appears twice. Use first occurrence. Also, the "How We Work" values are duplicated with slight differences. I'll ignore them as they are not in the required headings. But they are substantive. However, the rules say "Preserve ALL substantive information". But also "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." I could include a "How We Work" section with

            but not in the example. The example says "e.g." so maybe it's okay. But the instruction: "use

            for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It might be interpreted as only those headings. I'll err on side of caution and not include extra headings. I'll fold the values into "About the role" as a paragraph or list? But the values are four with descriptions. Could be a list under "About the role". But the heading "About the role" is for the role description. The values are company values. Might be better to include as a separate section "How We Work" but not in the example. I think I'll include it as a subsection under "About the role" using

            ? But the rules say use

            for section headings. Not

            . So maybe not. Given the duplication, I'll omit "How We Work" entirely? But that loses information. The rules: "Preserve ALL substantive information". So I must include it. I'll include a

            How We Work

            even though not in example, because it's substantive. But the instruction says "use

            for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not exhaustive. I think it's okay to add a heading for "How We Work". However, the rules also say "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". It does. So I'll add it. But then the example list includes "Skills" which is not in the posting. So I'll only include sections that have content. Let's decide: I'll include "How We Work" as a section with the four values as a list. But note: The "How We Work" section appears twice with slightly different text. I'll merge them, taking the first version (with emojis) or the second? The first has emojis, the second doesn't. I'll use the first version (with emojis) as it's more detailed. Actually the first version has emojis and the second is plain. I'll combine unique points. But the posting has two "How We Work" sections: one after "Compensation" and one after "Benefits". They are similar but not identical. The first has four values with descriptions. The second also has four values but descriptions differ slightly. I'll use the first one. Now, Benefits: There are two Benefits sections, one with emojis, one without. I'll use the first one. Now, write HTML. I'll structure:

            Company overview...

            About the role

            Shepherd's underwriting approach...

            This is a position based in our New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Los Angeles, or Dallas–Fort Worth offices.

            Responsibilities

            • Define the strategy for retail commercial casualty...