Chef de l'Exploitation - Aéroports - EWR

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting is in French. We need to preserve all substantive info. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. The posting includes: introductory paragraph about belonging to Air Canada, then description of role, then "Responsabilités" list, then "Qualifications" list, then "Nota" about non-citizens, then "Conditions D’emploi", then "Exigences Linguistiques", then "Diversité et inclusion", then thank you note. We need to map these to sections: About the role (intro), Responsibilities, Qualifications (maybe includes education, experience, licences, etc.), Skills (maybe leadership, communication, problem solving, etc.), Benefits? Not mentioned. Pay? Not mentioned. Schedule? Not mentioned explicitly but there is mention of shift work, weekends, holidays, 24/7 operation. That could be considered Schedule. The posting says: "Le poste exige de travailler à l’intérieur et à l’extérieur pour répondre aux besoins opérationnels, quelles que soient les conditions météorologiques.L’exploitation aéroportuaire en activité 24 heures sur 24 exigera le travail par postes, y compris la fin de semaine et les jours fériés." That's schedule info. So we can include a Schedule section. Benefits: not mentioned. Pay: not mentioned. So we omit those. We need to use

for section headings. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

  for prose. We must not repeat the job title as a heading. The job title is "Chef de l’Exploitation – Aéroports". Not to be used as heading. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings (none present). We must preserve all substantive info; do not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The posting includes "Nota : Les non-citoyens..." that's substantive (eligibility). Also "Conditions D’emploi" about eligibility to work, proof before start date. That's substantive. "Exigences Linguistiques" about bilingual preference. "Diversité et inclusion" statement. Also thank you line: "Air Canada remercie tous les candidats de leur intérêt, mais seules les personnes sélectionnées pour une entrevue seront contactées." That's boilerplate? It's a standard closing statement; might be considered application instruction? It's not exactly instruction but it's a generic statement. The instruction says remove application instructions. This line is about contacting only selected candidates; could be considered boilerplate. Safer to remove it? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." The thank you line is not exactly application instruction but it's a standard closing. Might be considered boilerplate. I'd remove it to be safe. Also "Nota" about non-citizens: that's substantive eligibility info, keep. We need to structure sections: - About the role: introductory paragraphs up to before "Responsabilités". That includes first paragraph(s) describing belonging to Air Canada, role description, etc. We'll put that in

  . - Responsibilities: list after "Responsabilités". We'll output

  Responsabilités

  then
  • each item. - Qualifications: after "Qualifications". We'll output

    Qualifications

    then
    • each item. - Skills: maybe we can extract leadership, communication, problem solving, interpersonal, adaptability, etc. But those are already in Qualifications list? Actually Qualifications list includes many items: "Solides compétences en leadership...", "Courage managérial...", "Excellentes compétences en communication...", "Capacité à résoudre des problèmes...", "Excellentes relations interpersonnelles...", "Esprit d’entreprise...", "Capacité à établir une relation de confiance...", "Attitude énergique...", "Capacité à s’adapter aux nouvelles technologies...", "Ponctualité et fiabilité avérées...". Those are skills/competencies. Could be placed under Skills section. But the instruction says use sections only when posting has real specific content. The posting already has those under Qualifications. We could keep them under Qualifications. Or we could split: Qualifications for education/experience/licences, Skills for competencies. But we must not invent sections; we can decide to keep all under Qualifications. However the instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe better to have About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications (which includes education, experience, licences, skills, etc.), Schedule. That's four sections. We need to include Schedule section with info about shift work, weekends, holidays, indoor/outdoor, weather, 24/7. We also need to include maybe a section for "Conditions d'emploi" (eligibility to work, proof before start). That's substantive. Could be under Qualifications? Or separate section "Conditions d'emploi". The instruction says use headings for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It doesn't list Conditions d'emploi. But we can still use

      for any section heading? The instruction says use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It gives examples but not exclusive list. It says "Use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we can use other headings as long as they are

      . Probably okay to add Conditions d'emploi and Exigences Linguistiques and Diversité et inclusion as sections. But we should prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Those are thin but still substantive. Could combine Conditions d'emploi and Exigences Linguistiques and Diversité et inclusion into a "Requirements" section? The instruction includes Requirements as a possible heading. So we could make a Requirements section that includes eligibility to work, language requirements, diversity statement? Diversity statement is more about company policy, not a requirement for candidate. Might be better to keep as separate section? But we want few sections. Perhaps we can have About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications (including education, experience, licences, skills), Requirements (including eligibility to work, language, ability to obtain badges, schedule). But schedule is separate. Let's think: The posting includes many bullet items under Qualifications that are actually skills/competencies. If we put all under Qualifications, it's a long list but okay. We also have "Nota" about non-citizens and customs seal eligibility. That's a requirement/condition. Could be under Qualifications as well. We have "Conditions D’emploi" about eligibility to work in the country, obtaining work permits, proof before start. That's also a requirement. We have "Exigences Linguistiques" about bilingual preference. We have "Diversité et inclusion" statement about company policy. We could combine all these into a section "Exigences et conditions" (Requirements and conditions). But the instruction says we can use Requirements heading. So we can have a Requirements section that includes: eligibility to work, language preference, ability to obtain badges, customs seal, etc. Also maybe include the note about non-citizens. Schedule section separate. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications (maybe we rename Qualifications to "Compétences" but we already used Requirements for eligibility; Qualifications could be education/experience/licences). But we have overlapping. Better: Use sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications (education/experience/licences), Skills (leadership, communication, problem solving, etc.), Requirements (eligibility, language, schedule). But that's many sections. Given instruction to prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones, maybe we combine Qualifications and Skills into one Qualifications section (includes education, experience, licences, skills). Then Requirements section includes eligibility, language, schedule, etc. That's two sections plus About and Responsibilities = four sections. Let's do: - About the role (intro paragraphs) - Responsibilities (list) - Qualifications (education, experience, licences, skills/competencies, note about non-citizens, customs seal, etc.) - Requirements (eligibility to work, language preference, schedule/shift work, availability, physical demands? Actually physical demands are in Qualifications? They are physical ability to walk, stand, lift 23 kg. That's a qualification/requirement. Could be in Qualifications. We'll keep physical demands in Qualifications.) But schedule is about shift work, weekends, holidays, 24/7, indoor/outdoor, weather. That could be in Requirements. We'll keep Requirements: eligibility to work (Conditions d'emploi), language (Exigences Linguistiques), schedule (shift work, weekends, holidays, 24/7, indoor/outdoor, weather). Also maybe note about obtaining SIDA badge, customs seal, etc. But those are more qualifications. Let's extract the content. First, intro paragraphs: "Appartenir à Air Canada, c’est appartenir à un symbole canadien, Air Canada récemment élue meilleur transporteur aérien en Amérique du Nord. Faites décoller votre carrière en vous joignant à notre équipe novatrice et diversifiée à l’avant-garde du transport aérien de passagers. En tant que chef de l’Exploitation – Aéroports, vous jouerez un important rôle de leader pour concrétiser notre ambition d’être reconnus dans tout ce que nous faisons comme l’un des 10 meilleurs transporteurs aériens du monde. Votre priorité sera de faire en sorte que notre société aérienne remplisse ou dépasse les attentes des clients à l’égard de leur expérience avec nous. En vous consacrant à l’excellence du service clientèle et en vous efforçant d’accueillir chaleureusement nos clients, vous contribuerez à créer un environnement sécuritaire, positif et solidaire et pourrez anticiper et satisfaire les besoins de nos clients, tout en encadrant de manière proactive et empathique notre équipe. Le poste de chef de l’Exploitation – Aéroports offrira l’occasion de travailler dans divers domaines, dont ceux de l’exploitation des escales, les opérations côté piste et sur l’aire de trafic, les services de bagages et l’exploitation en aérogare, ainsi que d’interagir avec des fournisseurs de services tiers et d’assurer la supervision de ces derniers. Dans tous ces domaines, vous serez responsable de gérer l’expérience client et d’assurer le leadership de notre équipe d’employés de première ligne." That's the intro. Now Responsibilities list (after "Responsabilités"): - Diriger et superviser au quotidien des activités complexes d’exploitation aéroportuaire avec soin et avec classe. - Représenter la marque Air Canada et incarner la vision de la Société en matière d’excellence du service clientèle. - Apprendre à connaître nos clients internes et externes pour être en mesure d’anticiper leurs besoins et de respecter notre promesse. - Prendre en charge les clients dans les situations difficiles. - Établir et entretenir des relations de confiance. - Favoriser le perfectionnement et la capacité d’action des employés en encadrant et en soutenant l’équipe pour l’amener à donner le meilleur d’elle-même. - Collaborer à la direction et à la supervision d’un personnel syndiqué et de fournisseurs de services tiers, et encourager les employés à être responsables de leurs actes tout en respectant les conventions collectives et les normes de l’entreprise. - Surveiller et assurer la ponctualité en supervisant les processus