Certified Recovery Support Specialist
for section headings. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose.
We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. At end there is CLASSIFICATION, DISCLAIMER, STATEMENT about equal opportunity. Those are boilerplate; we should remove them. Also "Nonexempt" maybe classification but it's not required heading; we can drop.
We need to include all substantive info: Position Overview, Essential Functions (list), Skills And Abilities (list), Qualifications (list), Benefits (list), Schedule (sentence about evenings and weekends). Also maybe Physical Demands could be part of Qualifications? But we have no heading for Physical Demands; we could incorporate into Qualifications as a list item? But Qualifications heading is for qualifications; physical demands are not qualifications but could be part of Requirements? There's no Requirements heading in the list but we have Requirements as allowed heading. The posting didn't have a separate "Requirements" section; qualifications are there. We could treat Qualifications as both qualifications and requirements. But we have both Requirements and Qualifications allowed headings. We could put qualifications under Qualifications, and maybe put physical demands under Requirements? However the instruction: "Use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we can choose which to include. We have content for About the role (Position Overview), Responsibilities (Essential Functions), Skills (Skills And Abilities), Qualifications (Qualifications), Benefits (Benefits), Schedule (evenings/weekends). We could also include Requirements if we have any content like "Required: Lived experience..." etc. Those are qualifications actually. But we could split: Requirements could be the list of required items (lived experience, HS diploma, CRSS certification, WRAP cert, driver's license, background check). Qualifications could be the "plus" items (additional education, experience with developmental disabilities, teaching experience). But the posting lumps them together under Qualifications. However we can still separate: Requirements = required items; Qualifications = preferred/pluses. That would preserve all info without inventing. Let's do that.
Thus sections:
- About the role: Position Overview paragraph.
- Responsibilities: Essential Functions list (each bullet as
- ).
- Requirements: list of required items: Lived experience as a consumer of mental health and/or substance use disorder services; High school diploma or GED; Certified Recovery Support Specialist (CRSS) certification; Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) certification or willingness to complete WRAP training; Valid driver's license and current automobile liability insurance, including uninsured motorist coverage; Ability to successfully complete all required pre-employment background checks.
- Qualifications: list of preferred/additional: Additional education is a plus; Prior experience working with individuals with developmental disabilities, including adults and/or children, is a plus; Teaching experience and/or experience facilitating peer support groups is highly desirable.
- Skills: Skills And Abilities list (each bullet as
- ).
- Benefits: Benefits list (each bullet as
- ).
- Schedule: sentence about works evenings and some weekends to ensure Living Room is accessible seven days a week. Could be a
.
We need to ensure we don't include headings with empty content. All sections have content.
We must not repeat job title as heading. Not include Job ID etc.
We must output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown.
Let's craft.
We need to use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. For Skills also list. For Benefits list. For Requirements list. For Qualifications list.
For About the role:
Position Overview ...
maybe combine two sentences.
Position Overview: "Under the direction and immediate supervision of the Living Room Program Coordinator, the Recovery Support Specialist delivers supportive services to guests of the Living Room. The Recovery Support Specialist creates a positive, non-clinical environment that supports guests in managing crises in a comfortable, welcoming environment."
We'll put that in a .
Responsibilities: list each essential function.
Essential Functions list items:
- Supports guests who are experiencing mental health crises
- Connects guests with community resources to help prevent future crises
- Reviews with guests triggers to the current crisis, to help problem solve how to manage similar triggers in the future
- Collaborates with clinicians to ensure guests complete necessary assessments
- Completes all trainings necessary to become a Certified Recovery Support Specialist within a year of employment.
- Works evenings and some weekends to ensure Living Room is accessible seven days a week
- Participates in staff meetings
- Communicates with staff, guests, community agencies, and other internal or external entities in a professional and timely manner
- Works with other Trinity staff members in developing and suggesting events and system improvements, anticipates potential problem areas, and communicates any identified problem areas or concerns to the Living Room Director
- Reports any injuries or specific needs of guests to Living Room Director
- Advises the Living Room Director of any immediate or non-immediate medical problems regarding any guests.
Note: The "Works evenings and some weekends..." is also schedule; but we already have schedule section. To avoid duplication, we could move that to Schedule section and not duplicate in Responsibilities. However the instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; we can include it in both places? That would be duplication. Better to not duplicate; we can put schedule info only in Schedule section, and remove from Responsibilities list. But the Essential Functions list includes that line; we need to preserve it. If we remove it from Responsibilities, we lose it unless we put it elsewhere. We could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section referencing same? That would be duplication. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." It doesn't forbid duplication, but better to avoid redundancy. However we could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section that maybe just references that they work evenings and weekends; but that would be repeating same info. Might be okay but could be considered redundant. I'd rather keep it in Responsibilities and not have a separate Schedule section, because the schedule info is already there. However the instruction says include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. It doesn't forbid having a Schedule section if we have content. But we have schedule content; we could put it in Schedule section and remove from Responsibilities to avoid duplication. But then we would lose that bullet from Essential Functions unless we keep it elsewhere. We could keep the bullet in Responsibilities but rephrase to not include schedule? That would be summarizing away detail (removing the schedule detail). Not allowed. So we need to keep that detail somewhere. We could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section that just says "Works evenings and some weekends to ensure Living Room is accessible seven days a week." That would duplicate the same sentence. Is that allowed? It's not inventing or summarizing away detail; it's repeating detail. The instruction didn't forbid duplication. It said "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." Duplication preserves detail, not summarizing away. It might be acceptable. However they also said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Duplication creates thin sections maybe. But we can keep schedule as a separate section with that sentence, and keep the Responsibilities list without that sentence (thus we removed detail from Responsibilities). That would be summarizing away detail from Responsibilities (we removed the schedule bullet). That's not allowed. So we need to keep the schedule bullet somewhere; we could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section that just says the same thing; that's not summarizing away detail, it's preserving it (twice). That's okay but maybe not ideal. However we could instead keep schedule bullet in Responsibilities and not have a Schedule section. Then we would not have a Schedule heading, which is fine because we don't have to include all possible headings; we only include sections when posting has real specific content for it. The schedule content is present in Responsibilities, so we don't need a separate Schedule heading. The instruction: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". It doesn't say we must create a Schedule section if schedule info appears elsewhere. So we can omit Schedule section. That seems reasonable.
Thus we will not include Schedule section.
Now we need to ensure we don't include Pay section.
Now we need to strip boilerplate: CLASSIFICATION, DISCLAIMER, STATEMENT, etc.
Also remove "Nonexempt" maybe part of classification but we can drop.
Now produce HTML.
Let's craft:
About the role
Under the direction and immediate supervision of the Living Room Program Coordinator, the Recovery Support Specialist delivers supportive services to guests of the Living Room. The Recovery Support Specialist creates a positive, non-clinical environment that supports guests in managing crises in a comfortable, welcoming environment.
Responsibilities
- Supports guests who are experiencing mental health crises
- Connects guests with community resources to help prevent future crises
- Reviews with guests triggers to the current crisis, to help problem solve how to manage similar triggers in the future
- Collaborates with clinicians to ensure guests complete necessary assessments
- Completes all trainings necessary to become a Certified Recovery Support Specialist within a year of employment
- Participates in staff meetings
- Communicates with staff, guests, community agencies, and other internal or external entities in a professional and timely manner
- Works with other Trinity staff members in developing and suggesting events and system improvements, anticipates potential problem areas, and communicates any identified problem areas or concerns to the Living Room Director
- Reports any injuries or specific needs of guests to Living Room Director
- Advises the Living Room Director of any immediate or non-immediate medical problems regarding any guests
Requirements
- Lived experience as a consumer of mental health and/or substance use disorder services
- High school diploma or GED
- Certified Recovery Support Specialist (CRSS) certification
- Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) certification or willingness to complete WRAP training
- Valid driver's license and current automobile liability insurance, including uninsured motorist coverage
- Ability to successfully complete all required pre-employment background checks
Qualifications
- Additional education is a plus
- Prior experience working with individuals with developmental disabilities, including adults and/or children, is a plus
- Teaching experience and/or experience facilitating peer support groups is highly desirable
Skills
- Knowledge of the Living
for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. At end there is CLASSIFICATION, DISCLAIMER, STATEMENT about equal opportunity. Those are boilerplate; we should remove them. Also "Nonexempt" maybe classification but it's not required heading; we can drop. We need to include all substantive info: Position Overview, Essential Functions (list), Skills And Abilities (list), Qualifications (list), Benefits (list), Schedule (sentence about evenings and weekends). Also maybe Physical Demands could be part of Qualifications? But we have no heading for Physical Demands; we could incorporate into Qualifications as a list item? But Qualifications heading is for qualifications; physical demands are not qualifications but could be part of Requirements? There's no Requirements heading in the list but we have Requirements as allowed heading. The posting didn't have a separate "Requirements" section; qualifications are there. We could treat Qualifications as both qualifications and requirements. But we have both Requirements and Qualifications allowed headings. We could put qualifications under Qualifications, and maybe put physical demands under Requirements? However the instruction: "Use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we can choose which to include. We have content for About the role (Position Overview), Responsibilities (Essential Functions), Skills (Skills And Abilities), Qualifications (Qualifications), Benefits (Benefits), Schedule (evenings/weekends). We could also include Requirements if we have any content like "Required: Lived experience..." etc. Those are qualifications actually. But we could split: Requirements could be the list of required items (lived experience, HS diploma, CRSS certification, WRAP cert, driver's license, background check). Qualifications could be the "plus" items (additional education, experience with developmental disabilities, teaching experience). But the posting lumps them together under Qualifications. However we can still separate: Requirements = required items; Qualifications = preferred/pluses. That would preserve all info without inventing. Let's do that. Thus sections: - About the role: Position Overview paragraph. - Responsibilities: Essential Functions list (each bullet as
. We need to ensure we don't include headings with empty content. All sections have content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Not include Job ID etc. We must output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. Let's craft. We need to use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. For Skills also list. For Benefits list. For Requirements list. For Qualifications list.
For About the role:
Position Overview ...
maybe combine two sentences. Position Overview: "Under the direction and immediate supervision of the Living Room Program Coordinator, the Recovery Support Specialist delivers supportive services to guests of the Living Room. The Recovery Support Specialist creates a positive, non-clinical environment that supports guests in managing crises in a comfortable, welcoming environment." We'll put that in a. Responsibilities: list each essential function. Essential Functions list items: - Supports guests who are experiencing mental health crises - Connects guests with community resources to help prevent future crises - Reviews with guests triggers to the current crisis, to help problem solve how to manage similar triggers in the future - Collaborates with clinicians to ensure guests complete necessary assessments - Completes all trainings necessary to become a Certified Recovery Support Specialist within a year of employment. - Works evenings and some weekends to ensure Living Room is accessible seven days a week - Participates in staff meetings - Communicates with staff, guests, community agencies, and other internal or external entities in a professional and timely manner - Works with other Trinity staff members in developing and suggesting events and system improvements, anticipates potential problem areas, and communicates any identified problem areas or concerns to the Living Room Director - Reports any injuries or specific needs of guests to Living Room Director - Advises the Living Room Director of any immediate or non-immediate medical problems regarding any guests. Note: The "Works evenings and some weekends..." is also schedule; but we already have schedule section. To avoid duplication, we could move that to Schedule section and not duplicate in Responsibilities. However the instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; we can include it in both places? That would be duplication. Better to not duplicate; we can put schedule info only in Schedule section, and remove from Responsibilities list. But the Essential Functions list includes that line; we need to preserve it. If we remove it from Responsibilities, we lose it unless we put it elsewhere. We could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section referencing same? That would be duplication. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." It doesn't forbid duplication, but better to avoid redundancy. However we could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section that maybe just references that they work evenings and weekends; but that would be repeating same info. Might be okay but could be considered redundant. I'd rather keep it in Responsibilities and not have a separate Schedule section, because the schedule info is already there. However the instruction says include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. It doesn't forbid having a Schedule section if we have content. But we have schedule content; we could put it in Schedule section and remove from Responsibilities to avoid duplication. But then we would lose that bullet from Essential Functions unless we keep it elsewhere. We could keep the bullet in Responsibilities but rephrase to not include schedule? That would be summarizing away detail (removing the schedule detail). Not allowed. So we need to keep that detail somewhere. We could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section that just says "Works evenings and some weekends to ensure Living Room is accessible seven days a week." That would duplicate the same sentence. Is that allowed? It's not inventing or summarizing away detail; it's repeating detail. The instruction didn't forbid duplication. It said "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." Duplication preserves detail, not summarizing away. It might be acceptable. However they also said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Duplication creates thin sections maybe. But we can keep schedule as a separate section with that sentence, and keep the Responsibilities list without that sentence (thus we removed detail from Responsibilities). That would be summarizing away detail from Responsibilities (we removed the schedule bullet). That's not allowed. So we need to keep the schedule bullet somewhere; we could keep it in Responsibilities and also have Schedule section that just says the same thing; that's not summarizing away detail, it's preserving it (twice). That's okay but maybe not ideal. However we could instead keep schedule bullet in Responsibilities and not have a Schedule section. Then we would not have a Schedule heading, which is fine because we don't have to include all possible headings; we only include sections when posting has real specific content for it. The schedule content is present in Responsibilities, so we don't need a separate Schedule heading. The instruction: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". It doesn't say we must create a Schedule section if schedule info appears elsewhere. So we can omit Schedule section. That seems reasonable. Thus we will not include Schedule section. Now we need to ensure we don't include Pay section. Now we need to strip boilerplate: CLASSIFICATION, DISCLAIMER, STATEMENT, etc. Also remove "Nonexempt" maybe part of classification but we can drop. Now produce HTML. Let's craft:
About the role
Under the direction and immediate supervision of the Living Room Program Coordinator, the Recovery Support Specialist delivers supportive services to guests of the Living Room. The Recovery Support Specialist creates a positive, non-clinical environment that supports guests in managing crises in a comfortable, welcoming environment.
Responsibilities
- Supports guests who are experiencing mental health crises
- Connects guests with community resources to help prevent future crises
- Reviews with guests triggers to the current crisis, to help problem solve how to manage similar triggers in the future
- Collaborates with clinicians to ensure guests complete necessary assessments
- Completes all trainings necessary to become a Certified Recovery Support Specialist within a year of employment
- Participates in staff meetings
- Communicates with staff, guests, community agencies, and other internal or external entities in a professional and timely manner
- Works with other Trinity staff members in developing and suggesting events and system improvements, anticipates potential problem areas, and communicates any identified problem areas or concerns to the Living Room Director
- Reports any injuries or specific needs of guests to Living Room Director
- Advises the Living Room Director of any immediate or non-immediate medical problems regarding any guests
Requirements
- Lived experience as a consumer of mental health and/or substance use disorder services
- High school diploma or GED
- Certified Recovery Support Specialist (CRSS) certification
- Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) certification or willingness to complete WRAP training
- Valid driver's license and current automobile liability insurance, including uninsured motorist coverage
- Ability to successfully complete all required pre-employment background checks
Qualifications
- Additional education is a plus
- Prior experience working with individuals with developmental disabilities, including adults and/or children, is a plus
- Teaching experience and/or experience facilitating peer support groups is highly desirable
Skills
- Knowledge of the Living