Balance Sheet and Macro Research, Senior Associate
- for each.
- Required Qualifications, Skills, And Capabilities: list: Strong communication skills (both verbal and written); Self-starter with flexibility to pivot between topics; Excellent critical reasoning and intellectual curiosity; 2 years of experience related to economics and/or the financial system; Attention to detail and strong analytical skills; Strong academic background.
We could separate into Requirements and Qualifications and Skills sections. The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have separate sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. But we need to decide what content goes where.
The posting lumps "Required Qualifications, Skills, And Capabilities" and "Preferred Qualifications, Skills, And Capabilities". We can treat Required as Requirements (maybe also Qualifications). Preferred as Qualifications? Or we could combine.
We need to preserve all substantive info. So we need to include both required and preferred.
We could have:
Requirements: list of required items.
Qualifications: list of preferred items (degree in economics, experience using AI, familiarity with tools).
Skills: maybe we could separate communication, analytical, etc. But we already have them in required. Might be redundant.
Better: Use Requirements for required items, Qualifications for preferred items, and maybe Skills for the skill items (communication, self-starter, critical reasoning, attention to detail, analytical). But that splits.
Given instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we might combine required and preferred into Qualifications section, and maybe have Skills separate for communication etc. But we need to avoid thin sections.
Let's think: We have About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (maybe combine required and preferred), Benefits (we have benefits info in ABOUT US section: competitive total rewards package, base salary determined..., commission-based pay, discretionary incentive compensation, benefits list). Pay: we have mention of base salary determined based on role, experience, skill set and location; commission-based pay and/or discretionary incentive compensation. That's pay info. So we can include Pay section with that.
Benefits: list of benefits: comprehensive health care coverage, on-site health and wellness centers, retirement savings plan, backup childcare, tuition reimbursement, mental health support, financial coaching and more.
Schedule: Not mentioned. So we should not include Schedule.
We also have "About Us" and "About The Team" sections. Those could be considered "About the role"? Already have About the role. The "About Us" and "About The Team" are generic company info; could be omitted as boilerplate? The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "About Us" and "About The Team" might be considered boilerplate but they contain substantive info about JPMorgan. However they are generic; but they are not EEO. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep that info? It's about the company, not the role. Might be considered relevant but could be considered boilerplate. The instruction says remove duplicated lines, cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. "About Us" is not explicitly listed, but could be considered generic marketing. However it's substantive about the firm. I'd keep it maybe as a section "About the company" but not in allowed headings list. The allowed headings are limited to those listed; we should not add other headings. So we likely should omit About Us and About The Team because they are not in allowed headings and could be considered boilerplate. The instruction: "Use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It says e.g., implying those are examples, not exclusive? It says "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." Likely they expect only those headings. So we should only use those headings. So we need to map content to those headings. Thus we need sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay. Possibly Schedule omitted. We need to decide what goes where. About the role: we have the introductory paragraph. Responsibilities: list of duties. Requirements: maybe the required qualifications (2 years experience, strong communication, self-starter, critical reasoning, attention to detail, strong academic background). Could also include "Strong communication skills" etc. Qualifications: preferred qualifications (degree in economics, experience using AI, familiarity with tools). Skills: maybe we could list specific skills like communication, analytical, etc. But we already have them in required. Could split: Required -> Requirements, Preferred -> Qualifications, and Skills -> maybe communication, analytical, etc. But that would duplicate. Better: Use Requirements for required items, Qualifications for preferred items, and Skills for the skill-based items (communication, analytical, attention to detail, critical reasoning, self-starter). But then we lose some required items like experience and academic background. Could put those in Requirements as well. Let's define: - About the role: intro paragraph. - Responsibilities: bullet list. - Requirements: mandatory items: 2 years of experience related to economics and/or the financial system; Strong academic background; Attention to detail and strong analytical skills. - Qualifications: preferred items: Degree in economics or related field preferred; Experience using AI to speed up analysis and coding; Familiarity with tools such as Excel, Python, Bloomberg, Haver, or similar data platforms. - Skills: communication skills (both verbal and written); Self-starter with flexibility to pivot between topics; Excellent critical reasoning and intellectual curiosity. That covers all. Benefits: list from ABOUT US: comprehensive health care coverage, on-site health and wellness centers, a retirement savings plan, backup childcare, tuition reimbursement, mental health support, financial coaching and more. Pay: mention: competitive total rewards package including base salary determined based on the role, experience, skill set and location. Those in eligible roles may receive commission-based pay and/or discretionary incentive compensation, paid in the form of cash and/or forfeitable equity, awarded in recognition of individual achievements and contributions. We should not include "Additional details about total compensation and benefits will be provided during the hiring process." That's somewhat generic but still substantive? Might be considered boilerplate but it's about process. Could keep but it's vague. Might be okay to include as part of Pay section? It's not specific. Might be considered filler. Safer to omit. Schedule: none, omit. Now produce HTML fragment with
headings and
or
- .
We must not include /. Just fragment.
Let's craft:
About the role
Join JPMorgan's Treasury and Chief Investment Office and make a real impact. This position sits in the Balance Sheet and Macro Research (BSMR) team, which reports to the Head of Rates and Research within Treasury/Chief Investment Office. This team is responsible for providing thought leadership on system balance sheet dynamics and macro topics for senior management in JPM Treasury. As a Senior Associate in the Balance Sheet and Macro Research (BSMR) team within Treasury/Chief Investment Office, you will be responsible for performing high quality analyses, communicating them clearly and concisely to senior management, and maintaining a research library. In this role you will work closely with senior management and the investment portfolio and can help inform balance sheet management decisions. To be successful, you must be curious about economics and the financial system, self-motivated, and an excellent communicator.
Responsibilities
- Synthesize third-party research and, where appropriate, original analysis to provide senior stakeholders with concise written and verbal reports on macro topics, for example: alternative data sources, fiscal sustainability, demographics, and the labor market
- Curate a repository of high-value internal and external research
- Analyze data and maintain dashboards. Develop and maintain metrics and dashboards to track key macro themes, using AI to expedite processes
- Dig into economic data releases as needed to understand methodology and the granular details of releases, working independently to frame the nuance
- Communicate any key findings or results quickly and concisely to management
Requirements
- 2 years of experience related to economics and/or the financial system
- Strong academic background
- Attention to detail and strong analytical skills
Qualifications
- Degree in economics or related field preferred
- Experience using AI to speed up analysis and coding
- Familiarity with tools such as Excel, Python, Bloomberg, Haver, or similar data platforms
Skills
- Strong communication skills (both verbal and written)
- Self-starter with flexibility to pivot between topics
- Excellent critical reasoning and intellectual curiosity
Benefits
- Comprehensive health care coverage
- On-site health and wellness centers
- Retirement savings plan
- Backup childcare
- Tuition reimbursement
- .
We must not include /. Just fragment.
Let's craft: