Aviation Operations and Compliance Specialist
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove repeated sponsorship line? It's part of eligibility but maybe considered boilerplate? The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The sponsorship line is not exactly those categories, but it's about work eligibility. Might be considered legal? It's about work authorization. Might be considered legal boilerplate. However the instruction says remove EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. Sponsorship line is not EEO but maybe still legal. Safer to keep? The line appears twice: "At this time, GSD is not offering sponsorship and is only accepting applications from persons eligible to work in the United States;" appears in Working Conditions And Physical Requirements and later again. It's duplicated. We should keep one instance maybe in a short paragraph. But we could incorporate into a short
under Requirements or Qualifications? The instruction: "Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it." So we can fold sponsorship eligibility into a short
. Probably include a short paragraph about work eligibility. We need sections: About the role (intro paragraph), Responsibilities (Essential Functions list), Requirements (maybe Qualifications? Actually they have Qualifications section with Required Experience, Required Education, Desired Professional Licenses/Certifications). Skills (Knowledge/Skills). Benefits (they list benefits). Pay (not mentioned, so omit). Schedule (not mentioned, omit). Also maybe Working Conditions could be part of Requirements? But we have no heading for Working Conditions in list; we could include under Requirements or maybe as its own section if content exists, but not in allowed headings list. The instruction says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should stick to those headings only. So we need to map content to these.
About the role: intro paragraph describing role: "Global Support and Development (GSD) is hiring a full-time Aviation Operations and Compliance Specialist based in Charlotte, N.C. In this high-impact role, you’ll direct critical air movements, manage charter networks, and ensure strict FAA compliance to transport vital relief personnel and up to 10,000 lbs of emergency cargo directly into disaster-affected regions across the Caribbean and Central America. If you bring 5+ years of aviation operations experience, strong FAA knowledge, and a passion for rapid-response humanitarian action, apply today to pilot logistics where they matter most!"
Responsibilities: Essential Functions list (the bullet points). We'll put as - each.
Requirements: maybe combine Required Experience and Required Education? But we also have Qualifications heading separate. The list includes both Requirements and Qualifications as possible headings. We need to decide: Use Requirements for experience/education? Qualifications for licenses/certs? The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section? But they are separate headings allowed. We could have Requirements (experience + education) and Qualifications (licenses/certs + knowledge/skills?). But they also have Skills heading. So we could split: Requirements (experience + education), Qualifications (licenses/certs), Skills (knowledge/skills). Benefits separate.
Let's extract:
Required Experience: Five (5) or more years of relevant experience in aviation operations, preferably in the humanitarian sector and preferably with fixed wing aircraft; Three (3) or more years experience operating in support of aviation operations within an international context, including with small operators, preferably in connection to the humanitarian field; Understanding of documentation required for air cargo or air passenger transport; Understanding of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) related to aviation (specifically Parts 91, 133, 135 and special permits); Working knowledge of aviation safety management system and risk management; Working knowledge of ICAO regulations, aviation regulations, and the air charter market in the LAC Region; Experience working at or contracting with charter aircraft operations (FAA part 135), and aviation insurance, preferred; Experience and familiarization with aviation operations (and/or contracting) specific to maritime fields, ideally within the Caribbean and/or Central America preferred; and Experience with aerial HAZMAT transportation and inspections, aviation law, familiarization with UAS, FAA instrument ratings, and rotary and fixed wing experience, preferred.
Required Education: Bachelor’s degree in air operations, air traffic management, maritime aviation operations, aviation business administration or relevant field; or Equivalent experience and training in aviation operations.
Desired Professional Licenses/Certifications: FAA private, commercial, or airline transport pilot (ATP) desired; and FAA part 107 certification desired.
Knowledge/Skills: Proven ability to produce quality results within challenging timeframes and ongoing change; Ability to support the development of programmatic policy, procedure, and guidelines; Ability to coordinate multiple projects simultaneously under pressure; Confident and effective written and verbal communication, to include presentation ability; Cultural awareness and the ability to work collaboratively with a wide array of stakeholders to build relationships; Ability to work with external partners to coordinate with GSD mission activity; Discernment for confidentiality in relation to organizational, partner, and donor activities and communications; Proven experience supporting the development of programs preferred; Strong organizational skills and the ability to rapidly shift tasks; Experience working and/or traveling domestically and internationally; and Working knowledge of Spanish and/or French desired.
We'll put Requirements heading with experience and education combined? Could separate but we have Qualifications for licenses/certs. So Requirements: experience + education.
Qualifications: licenses/certs.
Skills: knowledge/skills.
Benefits: list benefits.
We also need to include a short paragraph about work eligibility (sponsorship). Could be placed under Requirements as a short p before list? Or maybe under About the role? Probably better as a short p under Requirements (or after About the role). We'll include a
stating: "At this time, GSD is not offering sponsorship and is only accepting applications from persons eligible to work in the United States." Ensure not duplicated.
Also need to include location: Charlotte, N.C. Already in About the role.
We must not include duplicated lines: we saw the sponsorship line appears twice; we will include once.
Also need to remove application instructions like "Want to know more? Read on to learn more about the role." and "apply today". Those are application instructions? The instruction says remove application instructions. So we should remove sentences that encourage applying: "If you bring 5+ years of aviation operations experience, strong FAA knowledge, and a passion for rapid-response humanitarian action, apply today to pilot logistics where they matter most!" and "Want to know more? Read on to learn more about the role." Also maybe "apply today" is application instruction. So we should strip those.
Thus About the role paragraph should be: "Global Support and Development (GSD) is hiring a full-time Aviation Operations and Compliance Specialist based in Charlotte, N.C. In this high-impact role, you’ll direct critical air movements, manage charter networks, and ensure strict FAA compliance to transport vital relief personnel and up to 10,000 lbs of emergency cargo directly into disaster-affected regions across the Caribbean and Central America."
We removed the motivational sentence.
Now Responsibilities: list essential functions. Need to ensure we keep all substantive info. The essential functions list is long; we need to preserve each bullet. We'll copy them as
- items.
Check for any duplicated lines within essential functions: there may be repeats? Not obvious.
Now Requirements: include experience and education. Also include the sponsorship eligibility short p.
We need to format as
Requirements
then sponsorship line
then - for experience items and education items? Could combine experience and education in same list? Might be okay. But we could separate: experience list, then education list. However we need to preserve all detail. We'll make two lists: one for Experience, one for Education. But we need headings inside? Not allowed; only
for section headings. Inside we can have
or
. So we can have a for sponsorship, then
? Not allowed. Better to just have a single with all items, but we need to differentiate experience vs education. Could keep as separate each preceded by a describing. That's fine.
Thus:
Requirements
At this time, GSD is not offering sponsorship and is only accepting applications from persons eligible to work in the United States.
Experience
? Not allowed. So we can just have a Experience:
. But Experience:
Experience:
...
Education:
...
That's acceptable.
Now Qualifications: licenses/certs. We'll do similar: Qualifications
Desired Professional Licenses/Certifications:
...
Skills: Skills
Knowledge/Skills:
...
Benefits: Benefits
list benefits.
Now ensure we don't include Pay or Schedule sections.
Now check for any leftover boilerplate: we removed EEO etc. The duplicated sponsorship line removed duplicates. Also removed lines about "GSD’s nutritional environment contains milk, eggs..." etc. That's part of Working Conditions And Physical Requirements. Should we include that? It's substantive info about working conditions, allergens, vessel etc. The instruction says we can include sections only when posting has real specific content. We have no heading for Working Conditions in allowed list, but we could fold that into Requirements or Skills? It's not exactly experience/qualifications. Could be part of Requirements? Might be better to include under Requirements as a paragraph? But we already used Requirements for experience/education. Could add another under Requirements about working conditions. However the instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could add a section "Working Conditions" but not in allowed headings list. The allowed headings list includes only those eight. So we should not create a heading outside those. So we need to embed working conditions details somewhere else, maybe under Requirements as a paragraph, or under Skills? Probably under Requirements as a paragraph about "Working Conditions and Physical Requirements". That seems appropriate as part of requirements (job requirements). So we can add a
summarizing working conditions? But we must preserve ALL substantive information; cannot summarize away detail. So we need to keep the details, not summarize. We could embed a
list of working conditions under Requirements after experience/education. That would preserve details.
Thus under Requirements we can add a Working Conditions and Physical Requirements:
then with all those bullet points.
We need to ensure we don't duplicate the sponsorship line again.
Now check for any other boilerplate: lines about "This job description reflects an assignment of essential functions..." etc. That's legal boilerplate; should remove. Also lines about "This job description is a summary rather than a detailed list..." etc. Remove. Also lines about "Global Support and Development provides reasonable accommodations..." etc. That's EEO/accommodations; remove. Also lines about "GSD is an Equal Opportunity Employer..." etc. Remove. Also lines about "GSD promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion..." duplicate; remove.
Also lines about "Work Authorization Requirements: GSD participates in E-verify..." That's legal; remove.
stating: "At this time, GSD is not offering sponsorship and is only accepting applications from persons eligible to work in the United States." Ensure not duplicated. Also need to include location: Charlotte, N.C. Already in About the role. We must not include duplicated lines: we saw the sponsorship line appears twice; we will include once. Also need to remove application instructions like "Want to know more? Read on to learn more about the role." and "apply today". Those are application instructions? The instruction says remove application instructions. So we should remove sentences that encourage applying: "If you bring 5+ years of aviation operations experience, strong FAA knowledge, and a passion for rapid-response humanitarian action, apply today to pilot logistics where they matter most!" and "Want to know more? Read on to learn more about the role." Also maybe "apply today" is application instruction. So we should strip those. Thus About the role paragraph should be: "Global Support and Development (GSD) is hiring a full-time Aviation Operations and Compliance Specialist based in Charlotte, N.C. In this high-impact role, you’ll direct critical air movements, manage charter networks, and ensure strict FAA compliance to transport vital relief personnel and up to 10,000 lbs of emergency cargo directly into disaster-affected regions across the Caribbean and Central America." We removed the motivational sentence. Now Responsibilities: list essential functions. Need to ensure we keep all substantive info. The essential functions list is long; we need to preserve each bullet. We'll copy them as
Requirements
thensponsorship line
then- for experience items and education items? Could combine experience and education in same list? Might be okay. But we could separate: experience list, then education list. However we need to preserve all detail. We'll make two lists: one for Experience, one for Education. But we need headings inside? Not allowed; only
for section headings. Inside we can have
or
- . So we can have a
for sponsorship, then
? Not allowed. Better to just have a single
- with all items, but we need to differentiate experience vs education. Could keep as separate
- each preceded by a
describing. That's fine. Thus:
Requirements
At this time, GSD is not offering sponsorship and is only accepting applications from persons eligible to work in the United States.
Experience
? Not allowed. So we can just have aExperience:
. ButExperience:
Experience:- ...
Education:
- ...
Qualifications
Desired Professional Licenses/Certifications:
- ...
Skills:
Skills
Knowledge/Skills:
- ...
Benefits:
Benefits
- list benefits.
Now ensure we don't include Pay or Schedule sections.
Now check for any leftover boilerplate: we removed EEO etc. The duplicated sponsorship line removed duplicates. Also removed lines about "GSD’s nutritional environment contains milk, eggs..." etc. That's part of Working Conditions And Physical Requirements. Should we include that? It's substantive info about working conditions, allergens, vessel etc. The instruction says we can include sections only when posting has real specific content. We have no heading for Working Conditions in allowed list, but we could fold that into Requirements or Skills? It's not exactly experience/qualifications. Could be part of Requirements? Might be better to include under Requirements as a paragraph? But we already used Requirements for experience/education. Could add another
under Requirements about working conditions. However the instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could add a section "Working Conditions" but not in allowed headings list. The allowed headings list includes only those eight. So we should not create a heading outside those. So we need to embed working conditions details somewhere else, maybe under Requirements as a paragraph, or under Skills? Probably under Requirements as a paragraph about "Working Conditions and Physical Requirements". That seems appropriate as part of requirements (job requirements). So we can add a
summarizing working conditions? But we must preserve ALL substantive information; cannot summarize away detail. So we need to keep the details, not summarize. We could embed a
- list of working conditions under Requirements after experience/education. That would preserve details.
Thus under Requirements we can add a
Working Conditions and Physical Requirements:
then- with all those bullet points.
We need to ensure we don't duplicate the sponsorship line again.
Now check for any other boilerplate: lines about "This job description reflects an assignment of essential functions..." etc. That's legal boilerplate; should remove. Also lines about "This job description is a summary rather than a detailed list..." etc. Remove. Also lines about "Global Support and Development provides reasonable accommodations..." etc. That's EEO/accommodations; remove. Also lines about "GSD is an Equal Opportunity Employer..." etc. Remove. Also lines about "GSD promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion..." duplicate; remove.
Also lines about "Work Authorization Requirements: GSD participates in E-verify..." That's legal; remove.