Associate Director, Technology Disputes

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually the posting includes "About The Firm", "ABOUT Our Investigations Team", "Responsibilities", "Qualifications", maybe "Preferred" etc. Also "A rewarding career above all" is fluff but maybe not needed. We need to include sections only when posting has real specific content. Use

for section headings: e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. However we must not repeat job title as heading. We need to map content to appropriate headings. We have sections: About The Firm (maybe "About the role"? Actually "About The Firm" is about the firm, not role. Could be "About the role"? The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to decide which headings to use based on content. We have content: About The Firm (description of firm). Could map to "About the role"? Not exactly. But maybe we treat as "About the role" (description of role and firm). The instruction: "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It says e.g., meaning those are examples; we can use those headings if appropriate. We should not invent headings not in list? It says use those for section headings. Likely we should only use those headings when we have content. So we need to map content to those headings. We have: About The Firm -> could be "About the role". Responsibilities -> we have responsibilities section. Qualifications -> we have qualifications (required and preferred). Skills -> maybe we could extract skills from qualifications? But we already have qualifications; maybe we can combine. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could combine qualifications and skills into one "Qualifications" section. Or we could have separate "Qualifications" and "Skills". But we have qualifications list (required and preferred). Could treat as "Qualifications". Skills maybe not needed separately. We have no explicit Pay, Schedule, Benefits. So we should not include those sections. We also have "A rewarding career above all" which is fluff; maybe we can omit as it's not specific. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all bullet points from responsibilities, qualifications, etc. We need to format lists with

• . Use

  for prose. We need to remove boilerplate like cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. The posting ends with privacy policy line; we should drop that. We need to not repeat job title as heading. The job title is "Director of Technology Disputes". Not to be used as heading. We need to not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; none present. We need to output only HTML fragment. Let's extract content: About The Firm paragraph: "Secretariat professionals are trusted in the highest-stakes legal, risk, and regulatory matters around the world. When you join Secretariat, you become part of a rapidly growing elite team of bright minds and passionate problem-solvers. Your skills and expertise will be utilized on day one – working with the world’s most renowned law firms, leading corporations, and influential institutions to answer complex questions that shape critical financial, economic, and strategic business decisions. Our globally integrated teams are united by the ambition, energy, and commitment they bring to every challenge. We inspire and empower an open, collaborative culture that embraces ongoing professional development, recognition, diversity, and – most importantly – you. Make your impact at Secretariat." ABOUT Our Investigations Team: "As part of our expanding Global Investigations and Disputes team, you will work at the forefront of today’s most complex business challenges. We are looking for a Director of Technology Disputes to join our team (hybrid preferred or remote). Our expert team includes forensic accountants, certified fraud examiners, digital forensic specialists, technologists, big data experts, and former regulators – all working in concert to provide investigative, business intelligence, and regulatory compliance solutions." Responsibilities: list items (some duplicated). Let's extract unique bullet points: - Engagement Leadership: Manage matters end‑to‑end, including scoping, workplans, staffing, budgets, and quality control. - Lead analyses related to software implementation performance, vendor delivery, licensing, source code/architecture, software lifecycle development, and other technology related creation. - Direct the preparation of expert reports, rebuttals, and demonstratives; coordinate with counsel on case strategy. - Draft and direct the preparation of expert reports, rebuttals, and demonstratives; coordinate with counsel on case strategy. (duplicate of previous? Actually same as above but with "Draft and direct". Might be duplicate; we should keep both? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. Duplicated lines: we should remove duplicated lines. So we need to deduplicate. The two lines are similar but not identical: first says "Direct the preparation..." second says "Draft and direct the preparation...". They are similar but not exact duplicate. Might be considered duplicate content? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove duplicated lines. If they are substantially same, we can keep one. I'd keep the more detailed: "Draft and direct the preparation of expert reports, rebuttals, and demonstratives; coordinate with counsel on case strategy." That includes drafting. So we can keep that. - Client Service & Development: Support Managing Directors as part of the client-facing team on engagements. - Support business development through relationship building, proposals, and participation in industry events. - Contribute to thought leadership through articles, webinars, and speaking opportunities. - Risk & Quality: Identify and manage engagement risks; ensure adherence to firm policies and documentation standards. - People Leadership: Coach and develop junior team members, provide constructive feedback, and help build practice capabilities. - Own internal training documentation and templates - Mentor and develop junior staff by providing constructive feedback, and help build practice capabilities. (duplicate of first? similar). We'll deduplicate: keep one. - Typical Matter Types: list of matter types: - Disputes involving ERP/CRM/SCM/HCM implementations (SAP, Oracle, Microsoft). - SaaS/cloud contract and performance issues. - Software licensing and entitlement disputes. - Vendor governance, SDLC/Agile delivery issues, and technology program failures. - Intellectual property theft of software. Qualifications Required: - 8+ years in expert consulting services or industry specific experience related to technology implementations, complex IT advisory, investigations or expert services. - Experience with project management principles and industry standards. - Strong analytical and expert report writing skills. - Proven engagement management experience. - Excellent communication and presentation skills. - Proficiency in Microsoft Excel and PowerPoint. - Ability to travel. Preferred: - Legal background as a paralegal or similar position, or JD with 1-3 years of outside counsel experience - Prior involvement with expert reports/testimony support. - PMP Certification or other similar certification. - Exposure to source code review or collaboration with engineers. - Prior experience in large-scale investigations and client relations. We also have "A rewarding career above all" paragraph which is fluff; we can omit as not specific. Now we need to map to headings. We have "About the role": could combine About The Firm and ABOUT Our Investigations Team into a description of role/firm. We'll put that under

  About the role

  with paragraphs. Then

  Responsibilities

  with
  • for each responsibility bullet. Then

    Qualifications

    with
    • for required and preferred? Could separate required and preferred as subheadings? But we only allowed headings from list; we could still include

      ? Not allowed. Better to keep one Qualifications section and list all items, maybe marking required vs preferred within text? But we must preserve all detail; we can keep separate

      for required and preferred but still under same heading? Could use

      Qualifications

      then

      Required:

      then
      etc. That's okay. We must not invent headings like "Required" as heading; but we can use

      with bold text. Similarly for Skills: we could embed skills within qualifications; but we already have qualifications includes skills like Excel, PowerPoint, analytical, report writing, communication, presentation. So we can keep Qualifications only. We should not create Benefits, Pay, Schedule sections. Now produce HTML. Check for any duplicated lines: we removed duplicates. Let's craft. HTML:

      About the role

      Secretariat professionals are trusted in the highest-stakes legal, risk, and regulatory matters around the world. When you join Secretariat, you become part of a rapidly growing elite team of bright minds and passionate problem-solvers. Your skills and expertise will be utilized on day one – working with the world’s most renowned law firms, leading corporations, and influential institutions to answer complex questions that shape critical financial, economic, and strategic business decisions. Our globally integrated teams are united by the ambition, energy, and commitment they bring to every challenge. We inspire and empower an open, collaborative culture that embraces ongoing professional development, recognition, diversity, and – most importantly – you. Make your impact at Secretariat.

      As part of our expanding Global Investigations and Disputes team, you will work at the forefront of today’s most complex business challenges. We are looking for a Director of Technology Disputes to join our team (hybrid preferred or remote). Our expert team includes forensic accountants, certified fraud examiners, digital forensic specialists, technologists, big data experts, and former regulators – all working in concert to provide investigative, business intelligence, and regulatory compliance solutions.

      Responsibilities

      • Manage matters end‑to‑end, including scoping, workplans, staffing, budgets, and quality control.
      • Lead analyses related to software implementation performance, vendor delivery, licensing, source code/architecture, software lifecycle development, and other technology related creation.
      • Draft and direct the preparation of expert reports, rebuttals, and demonstratives; coordinate with counsel on case strategy.
      • Support Managing Directors as part of the client-facing team on engagements.
      • Support business development through relationship building, proposals, and participation in industry events.
      • Contribute to thought leadership through articles, webinars, and speaking opportunities.
      • Identify and manage engagement risks; ensure adherence to firm policies and documentation standards.
      • Coach and develop junior team members, provide constructive feedback, and help build practice capabilities.
      • Own internal training documentation and templates.
      • Mentor and develop junior staff by providing constructive feedback, and help build practice capabilities.
      • Typical matter types include disputes involving ERP/CRM/SCM/HCM implementations (SAP, Oracle, Microsoft); SaaS/cloud contract and performance issues; software licensing and entitlement disputes; vendor governance, SDLC/Agile delivery issues, and technology program failures; intellectual property theft of software.
      But note: "Typical matter types" is a heading inside responsibilities? It's a bullet; we could keep as bullet. Now Qualifications:

      Qualifications

      Required:

      • 8+ years in expert consulting services or industry specific experience related to technology implementations, complex IT advisory, investigations or expert services.
      • Experience with project management principles and industry standards.
      • Strong analytical and expert report writing skills.
      • Proven engagement management experience.
      • Excellent communication and presentation skills.
      • Proficiency in Microsoft Excel and PowerPoint.